Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Geeta Devi and Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · G.P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:657

The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded for motor accident death by disallowing future prospects addition due to lack of permanent employment evidence and set aside the award of lawyers' fees, emphasizing adherence to binding Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation future prospects loss of dependency minimum wages

Jagat Singh & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

21 Jan 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:10629

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under various IPC sections on the basis of a bona fide settlement between the parties confirmed before the Delhi Mediation Centre.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR settlement mediation

Naveen Malhotra v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

21 Jan 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:10631

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that factual disputes raised by the petitioner must be decided by the trial court.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act quashing petition blackmail and extortion bounced cheque

Mahendra Gupta and Ors v. DVB Employees Terminal Fund-2002 and Ors

21 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:11475

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking pension benefits post-VRS for lack of specific pleadings, allowing fresh petitions with proper reference to the VRS scheme.

administrative petition_dismissed Voluntary Retirement Scheme VRS pension entitlement writ petition

Chand Devi v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

21 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11509

The Delhi High Court held that street vendors cannot be evicted without certification by the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, and directed the constitution and functioning of the Committee to adjudicate vendor claims.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Street Vendors Act 2014 Section 3(3) Town Vending Committee street vendors

VIRENDRA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR

21 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11511

The Delhi High Court held that applications for recognition of teacher education courses must be processed strictly according to statutory procedure with an opportunity to remove deficiencies before rejection, directing fresh applications under new regulations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recognition of teacher education courses National Council for Teacher Education statutory procedure opportunity of hearing

M/s. SWASTIK PLASTICS v. M/S.SIPCHEM MARKETING COMPANY (SMC)

21 Jan 2015 · JAYANT NATH · 2015:DHC:653

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for injunction restraining payment under a letter of credit, holding that mere packaging discrepancies without prima facie fraud do not justify restraining encashment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant letter of credit injunction fraud bank guarantee

Rajeev @ Raju v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

21 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:629

Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of human trafficking of minors under Section 370 IPC, holding that consent of minors is immaterial and apprehension of evidence tampering justified refusal at this stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 370 IPC human trafficking minor children

Rahul v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Jan 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2016:DHC:504

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 376 IPC of a minor prosecutrix but modified the sentence considering the subsequent marriage between the appellant and prosecutrix after she attained majority.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Section 376 IPC rape minor consent

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-VI v. Icavita Gupta

20 Jan 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:11031-DB

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the Revenue's appeal by setting aside the ITAT's deletion of certain income additions and remanding the matter for proper reconsideration, emphasizing the need for proper calculation and correlation of transactions before additions or deletions.

tax appeal_partly_allowed Significant Income Tax Act Section 147 Section 148 reopening of assessment

Pallavi Bhatt v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:583

The Delhi High Court restored a writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution and directed official respondents to fairly dispose of the petitioner's complaint regarding her husband's withheld information, ensuring procedural fairness.

civil appeal_allowed writ petition restoration non-prosecution opportunity of hearing marital dispute

Ram Niwas Jain v. Ministry of Home Affairs & Others

20 Jan 2015 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2015:DHC:559-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL alleging land allotment fraud for being a disguised private dispute, held the petitioner guilty of criminal contempt for false declarations, and imposed a suspended sentence.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Public Interest Litigation PIL misuse criminal contempt false declaration

Ram Hit @ Ram Chander v. Ram Hans & Anr.

20 Jan 2015 · V.K. Shali, J. · 2015:DHC:594

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that a suit for possession based on dispossession must be filed within six months under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, and the appellant's suit filed after delay was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed possession suit tenant dispossession limitation

Santosh Kumari v. Union of India

20 Jan 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:570-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal of a CRPF constable for habitual unauthorized absence and upheld the disciplinary process and punishment as lawful and proportionate.

administrative petition_dismissed disciplinary inquiry unauthorized absence natural justice ex-parte inquiry

State of NCT of Delhi v. Kunwar Pal @ KP

20 Jan 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:613

The High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal in a murder case, emphasizing limited appellate interference absent very substantial and compelling reasons and the prosecution's failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Acquittal Section 302 IPC Burden of proof Eyewitness testimony

Deepak Kapoor v. State & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:564

The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear on the hearing dates.

other petition_dismissed non-prosecution dismissal default petition

Devinder Kumar v. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd. & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:565

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief for electricity meter installation, holding that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case and had suppressed material facts in repeated litigation over the property.

civil petition_dismissed interim injunction electricity meter installation prima facie case balance of convenience

Ravi Prakash Gupta v. State Through: NCT of Delhi & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:579

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC cannot be exercised when an alternate remedy to challenge the charge framing order is available.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR alternate remedy charge framing

Gaurav Wadhwa & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:578

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the futility of continuing criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Pranidhi Commerce Pvt Ltd v. Religare Finvest Ltd

20 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:593

The Delhi High Court held that a party's unilateral appointment of an arbitrator under a valid arbitration clause is permissible and dismissed petitions seeking appointment under Section 11 once an arbitrator was already appointed.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 16 arbitration clause