Delhi High Court

93,563 judgments

Year:

Vishal Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Jan 2015 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2015:DHC:683

The Delhi High Court upheld CBSE's normalization formula for JEE scoring, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to his rank as not arbitrary or unreasonable.

administrative petition_dismissed Joint Entrance Examination CBSE normalization percentile rank

Ravi & Anr. v. State

22 Jan 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:681-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld Ravi's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting his self-defense claim, but acquitted his mother Bimla for lack of evidence of common intention.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant murder self-defense common intention defective investigation

Bhim Singh v. State

22 Jan 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:680-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of Bhim Singh based on his disclosure statement leading to recovery of the dead body and corroborative evidence, affirming the admissibility of such statements under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant disclosure statement Section 27 Evidence Act dead body identification Section 302 IPC

Bunty @ Bharat v. State of Delhi

22 Jan 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:679

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction for attempt to rape due to lack of overt acts but upheld his conviction for molestation under Section 354 IPC based on credible child witness testimony.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant attempt to rape Section 376 IPC Section 511 IPC Section 354 IPC

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Lalit Bohra & Ors.

22 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:732

The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit in terms of a voluntary settlement agreement reached through court-annexed mediation and granted a 50% refund of court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Court-annexed mediation Section 16-A Court Fees Act Refund of court fees

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nutan Devi & Ors.

22 Jan 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:709

The Delhi High Court held that a borrower-driver is not a third party under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act and the insurer is not liable to pay compensation under the third party risk policy for the borrower's death.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act no-fault liability third party risk borrower driver

Sushila Badola v. Tushar Patni & Anr.

22 Jan 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:739

The High Court quashed a Section 138 NI Act complaint filed through an unverified Power of Attorney holder lacking personal knowledge, holding such complaint not maintainable.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Power of Attorney Personal knowledge Section 145 Negotiable Instruments Act

State of NCT of Delhi v. Damodar Singh

22 Jan 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:678-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a murder case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to unreliable confession, doubtful recovery, and insufficient corroboration of last seen evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant extra judicial confession last seen theory abscondance circumstantial evidence

Vinay Chhabra & Ors v. Vera Ruth Rego Gonsalves

22 Jan 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:664-DB

The Delhi High Court held that execution of an Agreement to Sell, receipt of sale consideration, and handing over possession violate a status quo order restraining transfer of property, dismissing the appeal against such finding.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant status quo order Agreement to Sell General Power of Attorney breach of injunction

Sabbu Shah v. State

22 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:727

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC, holding that the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy before the trial court at the stage of framing of charges.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR inherent jurisdiction alternate remedy

Sunbeam Products Inc v. ES EM International & Anr

22 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:714

The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a voluntary out-of-court settlement and granted the plaintiff a 50% refund of court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed out-of-court settlement Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Section 16-A Court Fees Act refund of court fees

Radhika Tandon Bhatia and Ors. v. Anuj Bhatia

22 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:713

The Delhi High Court decreed a family suit based on a joint settlement between spouses concerning maintenance, residence, and custody, emphasizing the best interest of minor children and voluntary agreement.

family appeal_allowed joint settlement maintenance minor children custody

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I v. Mohan Meakins Limited

22 Jan 2015 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.K. GAUBA · 2015:DHC:712-DB

This judgment records the hearing and decision dates for multiple Income Tax Appeals before the Delhi High Court without substantive reasoning or detailed findings.

tax Income Tax Appeal Commissioner of Income Tax Appellant Respondent

DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. VED PRAKASH @ PAPPI

21 Jan 2015 · VED PRAKASH VAISH · 2015:DHC:622

The High Court held that a claim for back wages during suspension is not maintainable under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act without prior adjudication of entitlement, setting aside the Labour Court's award directing payment of arrears.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act back wages during suspension pre-existing right execution proceedings

Ramashray Prasad v. Union of India

21 Jan 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:623-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the merit-based promotion process under the Flexible Complementing Scheme, rejecting reservation benefits and arrears claims by a reserved category scientist who failed to meet qualifying marks.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Flexible Complementing Scheme promotion reservation SC/ST relaxation

Balmukand & Anr. v. Anuj Kumar

21 Jan 2015 · Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:624

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction under Section 14(1)(d) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the petitioners failed to prove residential tenancy as the premises were used for commercial purposes.

property petition_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(d) eviction petition residential tenancy

Ravinder Kumar Jha v. Union of India

21 Jan 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:627-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld retrospective seniority and promotions in the UDC cadre arising from CSS cadre restructuring, rejecting the CAT’s order that had invalidated such retrospective effect.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Central Secretariat Clerical Service Upper Division Clerk Seniority Retrospective promotion

AIR LIQUIDE NORTH INDIA PVT. LTD. v. INOX AIR PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.

21 Jan 2015 · S. MURALIDHAR · 2015:DHC:642

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause contained in a document expressly incorporated into a contract concerning its subject matter forms a valid arbitration agreement under Section 7(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration agreement incorporation by reference Section 7(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act General Conditions

Unity Pratibha Consortium v. Airport Authority of India & Anr

21 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:638

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, overriding the contractually named appointing authority due to reasonable apprehension of bias.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Appointment of arbitrator Reasonable apprehension of bias

Jagesh Chandra Mishra v. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities & Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:641

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking appointment on the ground of reservation for physically challenged candidates where the advertisement did not provide such reservation and the petitioner unsuccessfully participated in the selection process.

administrative petition_dismissed physically challenged candidate reservation roster point system appointment