Mahendra Gupta and Ors v. DVB Employees Terminal Fund-2002 and Ors

Delhi High Court · 21 Jan 2015 · 2015:DHC:11475
Valmiki J. Mehta
W.P.(C) 3747/2014 and W.P.(C) 3749/2014
2015:DHC:11475
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking pension benefits post-VRS for lack of specific pleadings, allowing fresh petitions with proper reference to the VRS scheme.

Full Text
Translation output
•k)
5 and 6 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 3747/2014 and C.M. Nos.7572/2014 &1168-69/2015
MAHENDRA GUPTA AND ORS Petitioners
Through: Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Chandni Mehra, Advocate.
VERSUS
DVB EMPLOYEES TERMINAL FUND-2002 AND ORS Respondents
Through; Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
W.P.(C) 3749/2014 and C.M. Nos.7576/2014 &1170-71/2015
KULDEEP KUMAR JAIN AND ORS Petitioners
Through; Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Chandni Mehra, Advocate.
VERSUS
DVB EMPLOYEES TERMINAL FUND-2002 AND ORS .... Respondents
Through; Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Advocate for respondenfNo.l.
Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKIJ. MEHTA
ORDER o/o 21.01.2015 L After arguments, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh writpetitions provided that in the fresh writ
W.P.(C) Nos.3747/2014 &3749/2014 page1of2 2015:DHC:11475
V petitions the petitioners who have taken VRS show that in accordance with the VRS scheme in which they took VRS, the petitioners are entitled to benefit of the pension etc now claimed. The fresh writ petitions must contain the VRS scheme and also make reference to the relevant clause showing as to how VRS employees such as the petitioners who had taken
VRS can get pension etc.
JUDGMENT

2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. VALMIKIJ. MEHTA, J JANUARY 21,2015 Ne W.P.(C) Nos.3747/2014 &3749/2014 page[2] of[2] 2015:DHC:11475