Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

M/S. BOPARAI’S MARTIAL SECURITY PVT. LTD. v. Union of India

21 Jan 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:640

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery actions against the petitioner pending hearing of a statutory appeal before the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, which was non-functional due to the absence of a Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7(I) appeal Appellate Tribunal vacancy Presiding Officer appointment

Vineeta Tejpal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:645

The Delhi High Court held that a Masters Degree from Annamalai University is valid if preceded by a proper three-year Bachelor degree, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to respondent’s promotion based on alleged invalidity of the degree.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Masters Degree validity Annamalai University judgment Departmental Promotion Committee PGT promotion eligibility

Pradeep Kumar Verma v. Aparna Mehra

21 Jan 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:643

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the accused successfully rebutted the presumption of debt by raising a probable defence supported by credible evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 139 Cheque dishonour

GLOBAL ENGINEERING SERVICES v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

21 Jan 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:646

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery under the EPF Act where the statutory appeal could not be heard due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employee’s Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7-A Section 7(I) statutory appeal

Shatruhan Lal v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. · 2015:DHC:644-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 113 of the Insurance Act, 1938, dismissing the petition challenging LIC's forfeiture of policies and IRDA's regulatory order.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Section 113 Insurance Act guaranteed surrender value insurance regulation IRDA

M/S RAMESHWAR DASS & SONS (HUF) v. M/S CARAVEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. & ANR

21 Jan 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:625

The court held that no valid arbitration agreement existed as the arbitration clause in unsigned invoices was not accepted by the plaintiffs, and dismissed the defendants' application to stay proceedings under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 8 Arbitration Act Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act consensus ad idem

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Pooja & Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · G.P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:652

The Delhi High Court reduced compensation by removing future prospects addition due to lack of evidence but enhanced non-pecuniary damages, affirming binding precedent on future prospects and judicial discipline in conflicting judgments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant future prospects compensation motor accident claim non-pecuniary damages

Naresh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India

21 Jan 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:628

The Delhi High Court held that the Youth Hostels Association of India is not a 'State' under Article 12 and thus not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for termination of service disputes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India State definition Youth Hostels Association of India

Raju v. State

21 Jan 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:660

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking transfer of investigation, holding that alternative statutory remedies under the Cr.P.C. must be exhausted before approaching the High Court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant writ petition transfer of investigation alternative remedy Section 154(3) Cr.P.C.

Mehfooz Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

21 Jan 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:659
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that police custody remand orders are interlocutory and not challengeable under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after dismissal of revision, and inherent powers cannot override statutory bars on revision petitions.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant police custody remand Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 397(3) Cr.P.C. interlocutory order

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sh Mukesh Kumar and Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2012 ACJ 721

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation for the death of a homemaker in a motor accident, ruling that her services should be valued based on minimum wages without deduction for personal expenses, rejecting the formula linking her income to the husband's earnings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident compensation homemaker services valuation gratuitous services loss of dependency

Kashvi Buildwell Pvt Ltd v. Ashok Kumar

21 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:647

The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw an earlier suit for possession and pursue a later substantive suit filed in respect of the same property, granting liberty to both parties to contest the later suit.

civil appeal_allowed Specific Reliefs Act, 1963 Section 6 possession withdrawal of suit

Bhupinder Singh Jaggi v. Punjabi Bagh Club & Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:649

The Delhi High Court disposed of the suit on the plaintiff's withdrawal, granting liberty to approach the defendant Club's Managing Committee for future grievances and directing parties to bear their own costs.

civil appeal_dismissed withdrawal of suit liberty to approach managing committee electoral rolls internal grievance redressal

Gulzar Impex Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Mediderma, S.L. & Anr

21 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:650

The Delhi High Court dismissed a suit challenging termination of a distribution agreement due to an exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on Spanish courts.

civil appeal_dismissed exclusive jurisdiction clause distribution agreement governing law contractual dispute

Babu Ram Om Prakash v. Pradhan Herbal Company

21 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:651

The Delhi High Court accepted a voluntary settlement in a trademark infringement suit, decreed the suit accordingly, and granted a refund of 50% court fees under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Trademark infringement Court-annexed mediation Section 16-A Court Fees Act

Dinesh Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Jan 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:630

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioners' delayed representations for One Time Settlement in light of exceptional circumstances and prior settlement with HSIIDC.

administrative petition_allowed One Time Settlement OTS scheme administrative discretion delay in representation

Sunny Aggarwal v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

21 Jan 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:648-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging IOCL's tender process, holding that vehicle selection based on latest model date is valid and clause 11(d) does not bar trucks registered outside specified States.

administrative petition_dismissed e-tender tank truck allocation clause 11(d) clause 4(iii)(b)

Union of India & Ors. v. Rohit Mudgal

21 Jan 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:655-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing reconsideration of an inter commissionarate transfer request despite incomplete probation, emphasizing policy provisions favoring transfer where spouses serve under different governments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant inter commissionarate transfer probation period modified instructions 27.10.2011 earlier instructions 27.3.2009

Ajay Kumar v. Staff Selection Commission

21 Jan 2015 · Kailash Gambhir; I.S. Mehta · 2015:DHC:654-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing appointment of an OBC candidate whose recruitment was annulled on hyper-technical grounds of certificate format, holding that eligibility depends on notified caste status and not certificate issuance date.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant OBC certificate reservation Staff Selection Commission document verification

Brij Lal v. Kuldeep Kaur

21 Jan 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:658

The High Court allowed the second appeal setting aside a preliminary decree of possession passed on ambiguous admissions, holding that oral payment extending tenancy requires trial and cannot be summarily dismissed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 12 Rule 6 CPC preliminary decree of possession tenancy extension oral agreement