Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

Pranidhi Commerce Pvt Ltd v. Religare Finvest Ltd

20 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:591

The Delhi High Court held that once an arbitrator is validly appointed under an arbitration agreement, a Section 11 petition for appointment of an arbitrator is not maintainable, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the respondent's unilateral appointment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 16 appointment of arbitrator

Acura Glass Tiles Enterprises v. S.S. Ray

20 Jan 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:597

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, convicting the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonour of cheques issued in discharge of an admitted debt, and held that the trial court erred in acquitting the accused and permitting re-examination to resile from admissions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Dishonour of cheque Admission of debt

All Grow & Investment P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax

20 Jan 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:598-DB

The Delhi High Court held that notional interest additions without actual accrual of income are unjustified and upheld the deletion of such addition based on credible evidence and proper accounting principles.

tax appeal_allowed Significant income tax notional interest mercantile accounting additional evidence

Dr. Rohit Chopra v. The Chairman, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences

20 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:599

An ad hoc employee regularized later cannot claim retrospective benefits of regular employment prior to regularization under the scheme of transfer of a government department.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant ad hoc employment regularization General Provident Fund pension scheme

Enjayes Spices & Chemical Oil Ltd. v. National Research Development Corporation

20 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:596

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award holding a non-party liable and refusing to hold the claim barred by limitation, emphasizing that unpleaded fraud cannot revive a time-barred claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 17

Greenpeace India Society v. Union of India

20 Jan 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:572

The Delhi High Court held that denial of access to foreign contribution funds without notice or material evidence violates natural justice and fundamental rights, directing the government to allow Greenpeace India access to its funds pending enquiry.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 Article 14 Article 226 natural justice

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kripa Shankar Sharma & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · G. P. Mittal · 2015:DHC:601
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal granting recovery rights against the insured for compensation paid due to the insured's failure to disprove breach of policy terms involving a fake driving license.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance policy breach recovery rights fake driving license onus of proof

M/s. Dolphin Holdings Private Limited v. M/s. Dolphin International Private Limited

20 Jan 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:606

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and no unsecured creditors existed.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013 dispensing with meetings

M/s. Priapus Real Estate Private Limited v. M/s. Priapus Developers Private Limited

20 Jan 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:607

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation involving wholly owned subsidiaries, permitting the scheme to proceed without formal meetings.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act, 1956 dispensing with meetings shareholders consent

Om Jee Snacks Private Limited v. Om Sweets Private Limited

20 Jan 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:608

The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies upon obtaining unanimous written consents.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act, 1956 dispensing with meetings shareholders consent

Spectrum Realty Private Limited v. Arvind Estates Private Limited

20 Jan 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:610

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all stakeholders had given written consent.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Section 391(1) Section 394

M/s. Sino Credits and Leasing Limited v. M/s. Sino International Securities Limited

20 Jan 2015 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2015:DHC:609

The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening shareholder and creditor meetings for approval of a Scheme of Demerger where all shareholders consented and no creditors existed.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Demerger Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 and 394 dispensing meetings

Punjab National Bank v. Arti Sharma & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J · 2015:DHC:571-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a bank cannot freeze accounts of third parties without privity or legal claim, dismissing the bank's appeal against the order directing defreezing of respondents' accounts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bank account freezing privity Cash Credit Limit Non-Performing Asset

Monalisa Joshi v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:574

The Delhi High Court upheld the employer’s valid and non-arbitrary decision to not renew the petitioner’s contractual appointment as Associate Fellow, dismissing the writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed contractual employment non-renewal of contract performance evaluation judicial interference

Pranidhi Commerce Pvt Ltd v. Religare Finvest Ltd

20 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:639

The Delhi High Court held that once an arbitrator is validly appointed under an arbitration agreement, petitions under Section 11 for appointment of arbitrator are not maintainable, dismissing challenges to unilateral appointment under the agreement.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 16 appointment of arbitrator

Monika Arora v. Kamla Arora & Ors.

20 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:567

The court allowed withdrawal of a partition suit on condition that all relevant properties and parties be included in an earlier pending suit to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

civil other partition suit family settlement withdrawal of suit impleadment

M/S PARMANAND ADVANI v. RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LTD.

20 Jan 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:595

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award, dismissing the petitioner's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing limited judicial interference with arbitral findings of fact and contract interpretation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Arbitral award Judicial interference

SKB Infracons Pvt Ltd v. OSS Air Management Pvt Ltd

19 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:11775

The Delhi High Court disposed of the arbitration appeal as settled by a compromise agreement wherein the appellant agreed to pay Rs. 20 lakhs and withdraw counter claims.

arbitration appeal_dismissed arbitration compromise agreement memorandum of compromise appeal disposal

University of Delhi v. Poonam Sota; University of Delhi v. Ramesh Chandra Jha

19 Jan 2015 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:11585-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the University of Delhi remains liable to pay gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 until exemption is granted by the appropriate Government, and directed timely disposal of the exemption application.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 exemption under Section 5(2) gratuity liability Delhi University

SHRl SHYAM INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

19 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Baioiru · 2015:DHC:11505

The Delhi High Court permitted students of vocational training institutes to appear in Board examinations despite procedural delays caused by technical issues, subject to the outcome of an official inquiry.

administrative appeal_allowed vocational training institutes examination eligibility technical malfunction interim relief