Delhi High Court
93,453 judgments
National Highways Authority of India v. Afcons Infrastructure Ltd & Afcons Pauling (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing NHAI to reimburse enhanced royalty charges incurred by the contractor during the extended contract period, clarifying that such increases post-bid submission are employer's liability under the contract.
Seema Swami v. IHHR Hospitality Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim order restraining the appellant from receiving rent from disputed property and directing deposit of rent with the Court to preserve the subject matter pending suit resolution.
CIT v. Transceivers India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed if the assessee furnishes a bona fide explanation supported by evidence, even if expenditure is disallowed on merits.
National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery against the petitioner pending disposal of the restoration application before the EPF Appellate Tribunal, which could not proceed due to absence of a Presiding Officer.
Supreme Court in Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and v. Anr., 2013(11) SCALE 329
The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding street vendors' status under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 must be decided by the Town Vending Committee, directing its constitution and functioning, and refused to grant injunctions restraining eviction before certification.
P K Gadodia v. Madan Gopal Maheshwari
The Delhi High Court allowed criminal revision petitions and acquitted the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of a full and final settlement between the parties.
M/S. Qualcomm Incorporated v. The Assistant Director of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple income tax appeals filed by Qualcomm Incorporated as withdrawn upon the appellant's request.
S Sarup Singh & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties and consent of the complainant.
Krishan Kumar & Anr. v. State of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC at the fag end of trial, directing the trial court to consider affidavits filed by respondents.
Saroj Bala Sharvja & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIR and related orders but allowed termination of proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC upon payment of costs, restoring petitioners' bail bonds.
Shweta Aggarwal & Ors. v. State (The Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash FIR No. 110/2014 and directed completion of investigation within 12 weeks, granting petitioners liberty to pursue other remedies.
M/S SAI SOFT SECURITIES LTD v. MANJU AHLUWALIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding the petitioner liable for unauthorized trading, affirmed the Arbitral Tribunal's jurisdiction under NSE bye-laws, and rejected the petitioner's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking quashing of FIR for compoundable offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, allowing parties liberty to compound the offences and end proceedings.
INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD (IRCTC) v. M/S SRINATHJI CATERERS
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing IRCTC to refund security deposits to a caterer, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and validating the arbitrator's contract interpretation and findings on operational hindrances.
SIKARIA MEGA FOOD PARK(P) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim injunction restraining termination of a Mega Food Park agreement, holding that a determinable contract with termination clauses cannot be specifically enforced before a final decision is taken.
Prof. D.K. Sengupta v. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed after nine years, holding that a retired employee not subscribed to the medical scheme post-retirement is not entitled to reimbursement and delay barred the petition.
Sunita Bajaj v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a fraud case, holding that mere inclusion in the FIR without direct involvement does not justify denial of bail.
M/S SANTOSH INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is unpaid, and the 2014 Amendment Ordinance cannot retrospectively affect vested rights.
Sattar Mohammad v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not tendered to landowners within five years, and that mere deposit in court does not constitute payment.
Union of India v. K. Narasimha
The Delhi High Court remanded a disciplinary proceedings case involving an AGMUT cadre officer to the CAT for reconsideration in light of a recent authoritative decision clarifying that vigilance and disciplinary matters are to be dealt with by the Ministry of Home Affairs under AIS (D&A) Rules.