Delhi High Court
93,453 judgments
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shyam Sunder & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for the death of a homemaker in a motor accident, clarifying the method to value homemaker services and rejecting arbitrary linkage to the spouse's income.
Inderjit Narula v. Rohit Dua
The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal in cheque dishonour cases where the complainants failed to prove the existence of debt and the accused plausibly rebutted the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Inderjit Narula v. Rohit Dua
The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal in cheque dishonour cases where the accused plausibly rebutted the presumption under Section 139 by raising a credible defense of theft and the complainants failed to prove the loan transactions.
Inderjit Narula v. Rohit Dua
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in cheque dishonour cases, holding that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was successfully rebutted and the complainants failed to prove the existence of debt beyond reasonable doubt.
Inderjit Narula v. Rohit Dua
The Delhi High Court upheld acquittal in cheque bounce cases where the accused plausibly rebutted the presumption of debt under Section 139 by raising theft and the complainants failed to prove the loan's existence.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Shahida & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld negligence of the bus driver but reduced compensation by disallowing future prospects addition due to lack of evidence, reaffirming binding precedents on future prospects in motor accident claims.
Shanshah v. Idrish
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal of leave to defend in an eviction case, holding that the landlord's bonafide requirement and lack of alternative accommodation were established and the tenant failed to raise triable issues.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Ashok Kumar Valecha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding it liable for compensation as the driver named in the claim petition was admitted to be driving at the time of the accident and unpleaded evidence regarding another driver was inadmissible.
Bhushan Kumar v. Director of Education
The Delhi High Court held that professional fitness for re-employment of retired teachers up to age 62 must be assessed by the Deputy Director of Education, not the school Managing Committee, and set aside the refusal order accordingly.
M/S MINDA NEXGENTECH LIMITED v. TUSHAR KANTI GHOSH
The Delhi High Court decreed a summary suit for recovery of money where the defendant failed to comply with procedural requirements under Order XXXVII CPC and did not seek leave to defend.
M/S GUAR CONSTRUCTION CO v. DDA
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit without adjudication as the parties referred their contract disputes to arbitration and the arbitral award was awaited.
M/s. Futuristic Sales Private Limited v. M/s. Globe Panel Industries India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, based on overwhelming written consents.
M/s. Bhartiya Finstock Private Limited v. M/s. Springdale Trading Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented and no secured creditors or investigations were pending.
M/s. C. A. Process Industries Private Limited v. M/s. Jaipuria Beverages & Food Industries Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given written consent.
Inter Alliance Consultants Private Limited v. J.A. Textiles Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approving a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given their written consent.
Integrated Waste Management and Urban Services Company (Tamil Nadu) Limited v. IL&FS Environmental Infrastructure & Services Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for amalgamation of a wholly owned subsidiary into its parent company after ensuring compliance and absence of objections.
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a private employer adopting CCS(CCA) Rules mutatis mutandis can validly initiate departmental proceedings against erstwhile government employees transferred to it, dismissing the challenge to the charge-sheet on jurisdictional grounds.
Vikram Kapur & Ors. v. Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that inter-se family MOUs do not bind the company, which retains overall control, and set aside an injunction restraining the company from restructuring its units.
Geeta Devi v. M/S Updater Services (P) Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s finding that the petitioner was transferred, not terminated, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the award under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Rakesh Beniwal v. M/S Updater Services (P) Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s finding that the petitioner’s services were not terminated but transferred, dismissing the writ petition challenging the award under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act.