Delhi High Court
93,453 judgments
Indian Farmers Fertilizer Co Ltd v. IFFCO
The Delhi High Court accepted the parties' out-of-court settlement and decreed the civil suit accordingly, disposing of the matter by a compromise decree.
Jagpreet Kaur Gandhi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a contractual employee’s termination on undefined "business grounds" for non-compliance with contractual terms and held that concealment of material facts bars relief for regularization.
Rajwati v. M/S Updater Services (P) Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Industrial Tribunal’s finding that the petitioner was transferred and not terminated, holding that Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act does not apply to transfers and the petitioner’s claim was not maintainable.
National Front of Indian Trade Unions (DHN) v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed fresh verification of the petitioner trade union's membership for recognition as a central trade union, holding that procedural lapses cannot deny verification if eligibility criteria are met.
Mohd Sohail & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving non-heinous offences based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles laid down in Gian Singh and Narinder Singh cases under Section 482 CrPC.
Mohd Sohail & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs under non-heinous IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Om Prakash and Ors. v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 356, 332, 506, 186, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Arvind Kaushik & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 419, 385, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles governing the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Usha Rani v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a false FIR under Section 380 IPC lodged in a landlord-tenant dispute to prevent abuse of the criminal process.
Pushp Lata Kapoor & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement, holding that Family Courts lack jurisdiction to stay criminal proceedings.
Satyawan Singh v. UOI
The Delhi High Court quashed the dismissal of a BSF constable for refusal to take food during detention, holding the punishment disproportionate given his loss of appetite due to domestic distress.
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Amarjeet Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal, upholding the conviction under Section 308 IPC for firing without intent to kill and affirming the trial court's decision to release the accused on probation.
IDBI BANK LIMITED v. ESSLON SYNTHETICS LTD. AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the Debt Recovery Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to implead a third party not liable for the debt, setting aside orders adding Lohia Machines Limited as a party in a bank's recovery proceeding.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S Oceanic Solvent Industries Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award for non-maintainability due to failure to condone delay in re-filing and non-compliance with procedural requirements under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rajinder Singh Lamba & Ors. v. Monu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the motor accident claim compensation award, affirming the calculation of loss of dependency including future prospects and the interest rate granted.
Anita Negi v. Integrated District Health Society
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking regularization and equal pay for contractual employees of an autonomous health society, holding that regularization requires sanctioned posts with vacancies and adherence to the regular recruitment process as per the Umadevi judgment.
Santosh & Ors. v. Sea Hawk Tour & Travels Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal awarding compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act for the death of an insured employee, including medical expenses and interest, overruling the prior dismissal under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Preeti & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that no addition for future prospects is permissible without evidence, adjusted deductions for dependents, and upheld compensation with enhancements for loss of love and affection and consortium.
Uday Kumar Sinha v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of armed robbery charges due to unexplained discrepancies in prosecution evidence, particularly regarding timing and arrest, granting him the benefit of doubt.
Keashav Singh v. Director General, BSF
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Summary Security Force Court trial and disciplinary action against a BSF personnel despite delay and attachment to a different Battalion, clarifying procedural requirements under the BSF Act and Rules.