Delhi High Court

93,453 judgments

Year:

Mohammad Amajad v. Sarah Amajad @ Sonia Dhir

29 Jan 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:869

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging interim maintenance of Rs. 7,000 per month granted under Section 125 Cr.P.C., holding the amount reasonable based on the petitioner's admitted income.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance order income disclosure

DTC v. Mahabir Prasad

29 Jan 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:909

The Delhi High Court held that concealment of a prior dismissal order by the respondent constituted fraud vitiating the Industrial Tribunal's order, directed refund of back wages obtained by fraud, and imposed costs for vexatious litigation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant fraud on court suppression of material facts res judicata industrial disputes act

R.P. Dhiman v. North Delhi Power Ltd.

29 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:877

The Delhi High Court set aside departmental findings against an employee charged with submitting a false inspection report for energizing a domestic electricity connection, holding the findings perverse as no commercial activity existed at the time of energization and the connection was granted per office orders allowing connections despite apprehension of misuse.

administrative petition_allowed Significant domestic electricity connection false site inspection report departmental enquiry perversity

Swati v. Arvind Mudgal

29 Jan 2015 · J. R. Midha · 2015:DHC:876

The Delhi High Court held that a spouse's conviction for murder and life imprisonment constitutes mental cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, justifying divorce, and allowed the appeal against dismissal of the divorce petition.

family appeal_allowed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act mental cruelty

Wadia Techno-Engineering Services Ltd. v. Commissioner, North Delhi Municipal Corporation

29 Jan 2015 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:878
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes over consultancy fees and compensation under a municipal contract are arbitrable and limitation for arbitration is governed by the Limitation Act, not municipal suit limitation provisions.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Limitation

M/S. Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. Suman Lata Tuteja & Ors.

29 Jan 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:870

The Delhi High Court held that the money deposited with the Court Registry pursuant to an interim order belongs to the petitioner management after the Division Bench set aside the respondent's entitlement, and directed its release to the petitioner.

labor petition_dismissed interim deposit back wages industrial tribunal reinstatement

Lalit Kumar v. Murlidhar Shyam Sunder & Anr

29 Jan 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:905

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a cheque dishonor case where a bona fide settlement and payment extinguished the liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Acquittal Settlement Dishonour of cheque

Kanwar Pal v. Shakuntala

29 Jan 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:872

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution must prove specific cruelty or harassment under Section 498A IPC before the presumption under Section 113B Evidence Act can be invoked for conviction under Section 304B IPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Section 113B Evidence Act

Mohammad Aslam v. Gulista

29 Jan 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:871

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the interim maintenance awarded to the wife, finding the petitioner’s claim of low income not credible in light of his profession and prior settlement.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance revision petition family court income assessment

Mohan Lal v. State & Anr.

29 Jan 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:907

The High Court set aside the trial court's charge framing order for lack of a reasoned order and directed the trial court to pass a speaking order considering the accused's discharge plea.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. charge framing reasoned order discharge application

Raj Kamal Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. v. Jharkhand Shiksha Priyojna

29 Jan 2015 · Najmi Waziri · 2015:DHC:908

The Delhi High Court held that a government agency is liable to pay for books supplied under purchase orders accepted by it, despite alleged unauthorized procurement, where cancellation was not effectively communicated.

civil petition_allowed Significant Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Section 42 purchase order acceptance of goods

Akshay Gupta v. Anil Jaiswal

29 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:874

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a civil suit following an out of court settlement involving transfer of property share, dismissing the suit as withdrawn with parties bearing their own costs.

civil appeal_allowed out of court settlement withdrawal of suit civil suit property dispute

M/S TRANS ACNR SOLUTIONS v. M/S KAY KAY LOGISTICS

29 Jan 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:875

The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil suit for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's repeated failure to comply with court orders and effect service on the defendant.

civil appeal_dismissed non-prosecution dismissal of suit service of summons process fees

Anita Negi and Ors. v. Integrated District Health Society and Ors.

28 Jan 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:7500

Delhi High Court held that contractual employees of an autonomous health society cannot claim regularization or equal pay with government deputationists absent sanctioned posts and vacancies, but cannot be arbitrarily replaced by other contractual employees.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contractual employment regularization sanctioned posts Article 12

Euro College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

28 Jan 2015 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2015:DHC:11534

The Delhi High Court held that educational institutions must have their applications for course recognition processed strictly as per statutory procedure with an opportunity to cure deficiencies, and directed fresh applications under new regulations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recognition of educational courses B.Ed. and D.El.Ed. courses statutory procedure opportunity of hearing

Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-I v. Vijay Kumar Arora

28 Jan 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:10893-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act are not maintainable before it if the impugned order relates to valuation or rate of duty, which fall exclusively under the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Section 35L.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 35G Central Excise Act Section 35L Central Excise Act valuation of goods rate of duty

Rupen Raj Pahwa v. Kaajal Pahwa

28 Jan 2015 · Manmohan Singh · 2015:DHC:862

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging maintenance orders under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, holding that inherent jurisdiction should be exercised sparingly and statutory remedies exhausted.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 maintenance order inherent jurisdiction

Mohd Saffique & Ors. v. State & Anr

28 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:844

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380, 411, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR settlement between parties inherent powers of High Court

M/S. CHIKTISA MULTISPECIALTY HOSPITAL v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Jan 2015 · Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:822

The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery proceedings under the EPF Act when the statutory appeal could not be heard due to the non-appointment of the Appellate Tribunal’s Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employee’s Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14B Section 7(I) statutory appeal

Pushp Lata Kapoor & Anr. v. State & Anr.

28 Jan 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:853

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile, while clarifying that Family Courts lack jurisdiction to stay criminal prosecutions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement non-compoundable offences