Delhi High Court

28,294 judgments

Year:

BLS International Services Limited v. Union of India

18 Dec 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:11534
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a two-year debarment order against BLS International for procedural lapses and lack of particularized notice, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice and proportionality in debarment actions under the General Financial Rules, 2017.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant debarment blacklisting General Financial Rules 2017 show cause notice

Pankaj Gupta v. Land Acquisition Collector (North) Ali Pur Narela & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:11536-DB

The Delhi High Court held that possession of land acquired for Rohini Residential Scheme is deemed vested in DDA, acquisition has not lapsed despite non-physical possession and compensation deposit, and directed payment of compensation with interest to the petitioner.

property petition_partly_allowed Significant land acquisition deemed possession compensation payment Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013

Rajesh Gupta v. Asha & Anr.

18 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11571

The High Court held that execution of an eviction order cannot be deferred without an explicit stay, even if a review application is pending before the same Rent Controller.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction order execution proceedings review application stay of execution

Naresh Kumar Jain & Ors. v. Rishab Sharma

18 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11560
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Execution court rightly dismissed stay application under Order XXI Rule 29 CPC as declaratory suit filed after execution proceedings does not warrant stay and transferees pendente lite have no locus to object.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 29 CPC execution proceedings stay of execution transferee pendente lite

RINAL INVESTMENT PVT. LTD v. M/S OMSONS MARKETING PVT. LTD

18 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11550

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to allow late-stage explanatory amendments and related documents in a commercial suit, emphasizing the need for expeditious trial under the Commercial Courts Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC Commercial Courts Act

Bank of Baroda v. Sahil Chugh & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:11497-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of Look Out Circulars issued against wilful defaulters without pending criminal proceedings, affirming that only the Ministry of Home Affairs has authority to issue LOCs and that fundamental rights under Article 21 protect the right to travel absent valid grounds.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Look Out Circular LOC wilful defaulter fundamental right to travel

M/S TRINET SOLUTIONS PVT LTD. v. M/S GARG AUTOMATIONS AND CONTROLS

18 Dec 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:11508-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging arbitral awards, affirming the narrow scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and upholding the awards despite disputed debit notes alleged to be fabricated.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Arbitral award

IE ONLINE MEDIA SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NITIN BHATNAGAR & ORS.

18 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11501

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining continued online availability of defamatory articles after the plaintiff's exoneration, recognizing the right to be forgotten as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21, balancing it against freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a).

civil appeal_dismissed Significant right to be forgotten right to privacy Article 21 Article 19(1)(a)

M/S G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Shyam Kumar Sharma

18 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:11514

The Delhi High Court held that a workman is entitled to full wages under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act during the pendency of a reinstatement award challenge, despite small agricultural income and conditional offers of reinstatement.

labor petition_allowed Significant Section 17-B Industrial Disputes Act payment of wages during pendency reinstatement agricultural income

Rubina Sultan v. Mohd Shafi & Anr

18 Dec 2025 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2025:DHC:11537

The Delhi High Court held that an eviction petition filed by a person not validly appointed as next friend of a disabled landlord is not properly instituted, and dismissal of tenant's leave-to-defend application as time-barred mandates eviction, but the petition must be rejected suo-motu for defective representation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction petition next friend Order XXXII CPC

Dakshinii Delhi Dharmik Ramlila Samiti v. Sports Authority of India

18 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:11535-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Single Judge's ruling that the Sports Authority of India's grant of concession to one Ramlila Samiti was unfair and non-transparent, dismissing all appeals and affirming the recovery of full tariff charges.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant booking of public venue Sports Authority of India Ramlila Samiti concession and discount

Arya Orphanage v. Mukti Dutta & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:11519-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that complex succession and title disputes cannot be decided at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and that civil suits involving Letters of Administration may proceed to full trial.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order XII Rule 1A CPC Letter of Administration Indian Succession Act 1925

Narinder Kumar Jain v. Simmi Jain

18 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11556

The High Court granted the petitioners one conditional opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff in a loan recovery suit upon payment of costs, emphasizing fairness and expeditious disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Order IX Rule 7 CPC cross-examination loan recovery suit legal representatives

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. v. Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

17 Dec 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:10459

The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a party's name in its judgment under Section 152 CPC by directing an amended memo of parties and issuing a corrigendum.

civil other Section 152 CPC correction of judgment clerical mistake amended memo of parties

M/S RR FASHION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

17 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:11551-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging seizure memos for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the proper forum is where the goods were seized and stored, not merely where the testing laboratory or DRI office is located.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction cause of action forum conveniens seizure memo

Hitachi Systems India (P) Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:11554-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of opportunity to be heard caused by non-notification of Show Cause Notices on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST Act Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Santosh Kumar Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:11541-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST demand orders and notifications, directing the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit, while awaiting the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of the impugned notifications.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST Act Section 168A Show Cause Notice Writ Petition

Navneet Bansal v. Additional Commissioner CGST Delhi North

17 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:11539-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penalty for fraudulent CENVAT Credit, holding that writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercisable in such complex GST cases and directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant CENVAT Credit fraudulent invoices Input Tax Credit Article 226

State (Govt NCT of Delhi) v. Vasim

17 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:12044

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a robbery case due to investigation lapses and inconsistencies, emphasizing the appellate court's limited scope to interfere with acquittals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Acquittal Robbery Section 392 IPC Section 411 IPC

Naveen Kumar & Ors. v. State Through SHO PS Sultanpuri & Ors.

17 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:12010
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR arising from a family dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, subject to payment of costs.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence Section 528 BNSS Section 482 CrPC