Delhi High Court
28,294 judgments
BLS International Services Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed a two-year debarment order against BLS International for procedural lapses and lack of particularized notice, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice and proportionality in debarment actions under the General Financial Rules, 2017.
Pankaj Gupta v. Land Acquisition Collector (North) Ali Pur Narela & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that possession of land acquired for Rohini Residential Scheme is deemed vested in DDA, acquisition has not lapsed despite non-physical possession and compensation deposit, and directed payment of compensation with interest to the petitioner.
Rajesh Gupta v. Asha & Anr.
The High Court held that execution of an eviction order cannot be deferred without an explicit stay, even if a review application is pending before the same Rent Controller.
Naresh Kumar Jain & Ors. v. Rishab Sharma
Execution court rightly dismissed stay application under Order XXI Rule 29 CPC as declaratory suit filed after execution proceedings does not warrant stay and transferees pendente lite have no locus to object.
RINAL INVESTMENT PVT. LTD v. M/S OMSONS MARKETING PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to allow late-stage explanatory amendments and related documents in a commercial suit, emphasizing the need for expeditious trial under the Commercial Courts Act.
Bank of Baroda v. Sahil Chugh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of Look Out Circulars issued against wilful defaulters without pending criminal proceedings, affirming that only the Ministry of Home Affairs has authority to issue LOCs and that fundamental rights under Article 21 protect the right to travel absent valid grounds.
M/S TRINET SOLUTIONS PVT LTD. v. M/S GARG AUTOMATIONS AND CONTROLS
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging arbitral awards, affirming the narrow scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and upholding the awards despite disputed debit notes alleged to be fabricated.
IE ONLINE MEDIA SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NITIN BHATNAGAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining continued online availability of defamatory articles after the plaintiff's exoneration, recognizing the right to be forgotten as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21, balancing it against freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a).
M/S G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Sh. Shyam Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that a workman is entitled to full wages under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act during the pendency of a reinstatement award challenge, despite small agricultural income and conditional offers of reinstatement.
Rubina Sultan v. Mohd Shafi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that an eviction petition filed by a person not validly appointed as next friend of a disabled landlord is not properly instituted, and dismissal of tenant's leave-to-defend application as time-barred mandates eviction, but the petition must be rejected suo-motu for defective representation.
Dakshinii Delhi Dharmik Ramlila Samiti v. Sports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Single Judge's ruling that the Sports Authority of India's grant of concession to one Ramlila Samiti was unfair and non-transparent, dismissing all appeals and affirming the recovery of full tariff charges.
Arya Orphanage v. Mukti Dutta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that complex succession and title disputes cannot be decided at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and that civil suits involving Letters of Administration may proceed to full trial.
Narinder Kumar Jain v. Simmi Jain
The High Court granted the petitioners one conditional opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff in a loan recovery suit upon payment of costs, emphasizing fairness and expeditious disposal.
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. v. Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a party's name in its judgment under Section 152 CPC by directing an amended memo of parties and issuing a corrigendum.
M/S RR FASHION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging seizure memos for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the proper forum is where the goods were seized and stored, not merely where the testing laboratory or DRI office is located.
Hitachi Systems India (P) Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of opportunity to be heard caused by non-notification of Show Cause Notices on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Santosh Kumar Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST demand orders and notifications, directing the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit, while awaiting the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of the impugned notifications.
Navneet Bansal v. Additional Commissioner CGST Delhi North
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penalty for fraudulent CENVAT Credit, holding that writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercisable in such complex GST cases and directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal.
State (Govt NCT of Delhi) v. Vasim
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a robbery case due to investigation lapses and inconsistencies, emphasizing the appellate court's limited scope to interfere with acquittals.
Naveen Kumar & Ors. v. State Through SHO PS Sultanpuri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR arising from a family dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, subject to payment of costs.