Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Yash Malviya v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11830-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination for defective colour vision strictly following prescribed guidelines, setting aside the prior disqualification.

administrative petition_allowed Review Medical Board colour vision test Ishihara test anomaloscope

Tej Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11828-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, holding that interim relief cannot be granted at the interim stage absent lasting prejudice.

administrative petition_dismissed Armed Forces Tribunal interim order Medical Review Board Article 226

Union of India & Ors. v. 23900 GP CAPT B N SHARMA -RETD

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11611-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming entitlement where service connection is established despite RMB findings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Naimuddin v. Union of India

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11605-DB

The Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s candidature for Sub-Inspector appointment after acknowledging incomplete consideration of his qualification documents, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition merit list ex-servicemen category recruitment

WG CDR RS Manoj Kumar (Retd) v. Union of India and Ors

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11604-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Primary Hypertension is not attributable to obesity without evidence, allowing the petitioner’s claim for disability pension previously denied solely on the ground of obesity.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Primary Hypertension Obesity Disability Pension Causal Link

SI Deepika, PS Vikas Puri v. Sanjay Mandal

18 Dec 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:11820-DB

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case due to hostile testimony of the prosecutrix and lack of corroborative medical and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed hostile witness sexual assault POCSO Act medical evidence

Virender v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

18 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:11780

The Delhi High Court upheld the Municipal Corporation’s authority to remove unauthorized constructions and encroachments, directing compliance with interim orders and allowing action against non-compoundable deviations.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized construction encroachment removal Municipal Corporation of Delhi status quo order

Union of India v. Narendra Lal Meena

18 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:11635-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the stigmatic termination of a temporary government servant for impersonation allegations, emphasizing the necessity of a proper inquiry and fair hearing before punitive termination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant termination of temporary service Rule 5(1) CCS (Temporary Services) Rules, 1965 stigmatic termination natural justice

ASI Punit, Delhi Police v. Bhanwar Singh

18 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:11714-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal’s order and upheld the disciplinary punishment of censure imposed on a police officer for failing to detect illegal gambling, affirming the limited scope of judicial review in departmental proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed disciplinary proceedings judicial review dereliction of duty punishment of censure

Mukesh Kumar v. The Commissioner & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:11710-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid for the entire period of delay on the full amount due, modifying the Tribunal’s order which had restricted interest only to the unpaid balance.

administrative petition_allowed Significant retiral benefits interest on delayed payment vested right Central Administrative Tribunal

Primemover Mobility Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanmarg Infra Tech Private Limited

18 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:11713-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a section 34 application for non-deposit of 75% of the awarded amount under the MSME Act, holding such dismissal appealable under section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act and directing the appellant to deposit the amount within a stipulated time.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 application Section 37 appeal MSME Act Section 19

Ankit Kumar v. Sonam

18 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11685
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim maintenance order directing the petitioner to pay ₹12,000 per month, holding that the income assessment based on bank statements and salary was justified and not liable to interference.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC income assessment bank statements

Rakesh v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

18 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11684

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving serious offences under Sections 354 and 354B IPC, holding that such offences cannot be quashed merely on the basis of a settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC offences against women Section 354 IPC

Sanjay Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

18 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:11734
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 308 IPC but modified the sentence to release him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his social background and conduct.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Section 308 IPC Probation of Offenders Act conviction sentence modification

Rahul Khurana v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

18 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11647

Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail in a financial fraud case where the accused cooperated with investigation and custodial interrogation was deemed unnecessary, imposing stringent bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant pre-arrest bail financial fraud custodial interrogation Indian Penal Code Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34

Saregama India Limited v. Global Music Junction Private Limited & Anr

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11608-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to re-approach the court later, disposing of the appeal as withdrawn.

civil appeal_allowed appeal withdrawal Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC leave to withdraw appeal liberty to re-approach

Rakesh Kumar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11629-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the petition accordingly.

other other writ petition withdrawal disposal High Court of Delhi

Major Anish Muralidhar Army v. Col Jaspal Singh Anand Retd

18 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11606-DB

The High Court allowed the Union of India to withdraw its writ petition, which was disposed of accordingly, with the petitioners intending to seek review before the Armed Forces Tribunal.

administrative other Procedural writ petition withdrawal Armed Forces Tribunal review

Ashish Kumar v. Kamini Kumar & Ors.

18 Dec 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:11618-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on disputed factual grounds or merits, and restored the suit seeking declaration and injunction over roof/terrace rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint cause of action Specific Relief Act Section 34

Ravi Kumar Gupta v. Union of India

18 Dec 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:11600-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging land acquisition after possession was taken and compensation deposited, directing the petitioner to seek statutory remedies for compensation claims.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition possession compensation Land Acquisition Act 1894