Delhi High Court
28,294 judgments
Mukesh Kumar v. The Commissioner & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid for the entire period of delay on the full amount due, modifying the Tribunal’s order which had restricted interest only to the unpaid balance.
Primemover Mobility Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanmarg Infra Tech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a section 34 application for non-deposit of 75% of the awarded amount under the MSME Act, holding such dismissal appealable under section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act and directing the appellant to deposit the amount within a stipulated time.
Ankit Kumar v. Sonam
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim maintenance order directing the petitioner to pay ₹12,000 per month, holding that the income assessment based on bank statements and salary was justified and not liable to interference.
Rakesh v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving serious offences under Sections 354 and 354B IPC, holding that such offences cannot be quashed merely on the basis of a settlement between the parties.
Sanjay Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 308 IPC but modified the sentence to release him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, considering his social background and conduct.
Rahul Khurana v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail in a financial fraud case where the accused cooperated with investigation and custodial interrogation was deemed unnecessary, imposing stringent bail conditions.
Saregama India Limited v. Global Music Junction Private Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to re-approach the court later, disposing of the appeal as withdrawn.
Rakesh Kumar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Major Anish Muralidhar Army v. Col Jaspal Singh Anand Retd
The High Court allowed the Union of India to withdraw its writ petition, which was disposed of accordingly, with the petitioners intending to seek review before the Armed Forces Tribunal.
Ashish Kumar v. Kamini Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on disputed factual grounds or merits, and restored the suit seeking declaration and injunction over roof/terrace rights.
Ravi Kumar Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging land acquisition after possession was taken and compensation deposited, directing the petitioner to seek statutory remedies for compensation claims.
M/S Trustline Securities Limited v. Hanish Singla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the setting aside of an appellate arbitral award that wrongly validated unauthorized trades lacking margin money and proper authorization, emphasizing strict compliance with NSE regulations.
Simi Arun Pandeya v. Kumudini Mittal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the interpretation of a Will clause creating a two-stage bequest, holding that the ground floor devolves exclusively upon the son as residuary legatee upon the husband's death without alienation, dismissing the appellant's claim under intestate succession.
Sunil Kumar v. Rajeev Suri
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for inordinate and unexplained delay in filing and re-filing, rejecting condonation applications due to lack of sufficient cause despite medical and COVID-19 related claims.
Satnam Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition, holding that an adult woman voluntarily choosing not to reside with her husband is not under illegal detention and courts will not interfere in her personal liberty.
Shiv Lal Ahir v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity, emphasizing that prolonged trial delay and incarceration can override statutory bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
T.M ZHYMES v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for sexual assault of a minor under IPC and POCSO Act, upheld the core legal principles on victim testimony and statutory presumptions, but reduced the sentence to the statutory minimum.
Ram Chander v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The High Court acquitted a police officer accused of accepting bribe, holding that the prosecution failed to prove both demand and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
N Prakash v. M/S Consolidated Carpet Industries Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused condonation of a 922-day delay, holding that negligence of counsel and vague reasons do not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Manoj @ Krishna @ Eilli v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for rape under Section 376 IPC, relying on the victim's credible testimony and corroborative DNA evidence.