Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Arya Orphanage v. Mukti Dutta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that complex succession and title disputes cannot be decided at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and that civil suits involving Letters of Administration may proceed to full trial.
Narinder Kumar Jain v. Simmi Jain
The High Court granted the petitioners one conditional opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff in a loan recovery suit upon payment of costs, emphasizing fairness and expeditious disposal.
Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. v. Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a party's name in its judgment under Section 152 CPC by directing an amended memo of parties and issuing a corrigendum.
M/S RR FASHION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging seizure memos for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the proper forum is where the goods were seized and stored, not merely where the testing laboratory or DRI office is located.
Hitachi Systems India (P) Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of opportunity to be heard caused by non-notification of Show Cause Notices on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh hearing while leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Santosh Kumar Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST demand orders and notifications, directing the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit, while awaiting the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of the impugned notifications.
Navneet Bansal v. Additional Commissioner CGST Delhi North
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penalty for fraudulent CENVAT Credit, holding that writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercisable in such complex GST cases and directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal.
State (Govt NCT of Delhi) v. Vasim
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a robbery case due to investigation lapses and inconsistencies, emphasizing the appellate court's limited scope to interfere with acquittals.
Naveen Kumar & Ors. v. State Through SHO PS Sultanpuri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable offence FIR arising from a family dispute on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, subject to payment of costs.
Ram Singh & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs arising from family disputes under both compoundable and non-compoundable offences, relying on the parties' amicable settlement and inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Banwari Lal and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 528 BNSS.
Navneet Kumar Srivastava and Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.
Directorate General of GST Intelligence v. Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted in a ₹72 crore GST evasion case, emphasizing the seriousness of economic offences but refusing interference due to prosecutorial delay and absence of misuse of bail.
Food Inspector v. Maya Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of respondents in a food adulteration case due to inordinate delay in prosecution and lack of evidence on proper preservation of the perishable milk sample, which prejudiced the defense.
Greenlam Industries Limited v. Steam Equipment Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and that objections like limitation and arbitrability are for the arbitral tribunal to decide.
M/S Sita Devi Hospital v. Gist Management Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the Commercial Court's decree for recovery of payment for manpower supply based on implied contract and territorial jurisdiction under Section 20(c) CPC.
Bhupesh Kaushik & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving non-compoundable offences based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS, emphasizing the predominance of civil character and prevention of abuse of process.
Ramyash Sharma & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under SC & ST Act and IPC on compromise between parties, exercising inherent powers to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Siddharth Shankar v. SEBI
The Delhi High Court held that SEBI must disclose the Investigation Report forming the basis of prosecution to the accused at the pre-charge stage to ensure a fair trial under Article 21.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax-1) v. EXL Service.com Inc
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the US-based assessee did not have a Permanent Establishment in India under the India-USA DTAA, and thus its income was not taxable in India, affirming the arm's length principle and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.