Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Trilok Chand & Ors. v. Bhagwat Prasad Rustagi & Ors.

02 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3242

The Delhi High Court allowed a formal amendment to the plaint clarifying property valuation for jurisdictional purposes at the final stage, emphasizing that delay alone is not a ground for refusal if no prejudice is caused.

civil petition_allowed amendment of plaint typographical error valuation of property jurisdiction

Sukhbir Alias Kallu v. State of GNCT of Delhi

02 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3204

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused involved in a daylight robbery impersonating police officials, emphasizing the accused's active role and absence of parity with co-accused granted bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail robbery impersonation of police parity in bail

Barkat Ali v. The State NCT of Delhi

02 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:3214

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder and looting case due to weak circumstantial evidence, investigative deficiencies, and discrepancies in medico-legal records.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail circumstantial evidence telephonic connectivity medico-legal certificate

Tejinder Singh v. Beverely Singh

02 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3236

The Delhi High Court held that Family Courts have jurisdiction to grant interim injunctions restraining property sale in maintenance proceedings and directed the Family Court to decide the injunction application after due hearing.

family other Family Court maintenance Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 Section 18

SENATOR WOOD PVT. LTD. v. BABU LAL PATEL & ANR

02 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3233

The High Court held that a Trial Court must decide a review application before striking off a party's defence for non-compliance of the order under review, setting aside the impugned order and directing expeditious consideration of the review.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC Section 114 CPC Order XLVII CPC review application

MS INOX WORLD INDUSTRIES PVT LTD v. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANE COMPANY LIMITED

02 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:3202
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that repudiation of an insurance claim does not preclude appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, limiting the court's inquiry to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and leaving arbitrability issues to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Arbitrability Insurance claim repudiation

Virender Kumar v. Rekha Bhayana & Anr

02 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3190-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld summary judgment for recovery of possession and arrears of rent from 2018, holding that limitation excludes time bona fide spent in a court lacking jurisdiction and that unsubstantiated defenses cannot defeat admitted lease claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 14 Limitation Act Order XIIIA CPC

Uttam Kumar Daga v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Rohit Chauhan

02 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:3228
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court held that a former director who resigned before issuance of dishonoured cheques cannot be held liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act without specific pleadings of control and responsibility.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Director resignation Vicarious liability Dishonoured cheque

Kuldip Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

02 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5355-DB

The High Court disposed of the writ petition after granting the petitioner special permission to remain in Delhi for one year without setting any precedent.

other other special permission stay in Delhi writ petition disposal of petition

Facility Plus Estate Management Private Ltd. v. Innovision Ltd.

01 May 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 5182

The Delhi High Court held that electronic delivery of a scanned signed arbitral award to a party's counsel constitutes valid delivery under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration Act, starting the limitation period for challenging the award under Section 34.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(5) Section 34 Limitation period

Tarun Lata v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

01 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3171-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Central Administrative Tribunal for merits adjudication after the dismissal of a related writ petition, holding that interim orders alone cannot justify final disposal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal interim order status quo remand

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Tushar Deshwal

01 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3170-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing re-medical examination, holding that consistent medical board findings cannot be overturned merely on the basis of an external hospital report without proper factual and reasoned analysis.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical fitness Detailed Medical Examination Board Review Medical Examination Board re-medical examination

Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. v. Sheela Devi

01 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3169-DB

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order granting partial pension benefits without deciding the main issue of Old Pension Scheme applicability and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative other Procedural Old Pension Scheme CCS (Pension) Rules 1972 Central Administrative Tribunal pensionary benefits

Union of India v. Satish Kumar & Ors.

01 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3217-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing grant of Grade Pay Rs. 2800/- to Highly Skilled Workers Grade-I, rejecting the petitioner's seniority-based denial.

administrative appeal_dismissed Grade Pay Highly Skilled Workers Recruitment Rules Central Administrative Tribunal

Vijay Kumar Sharma v. R.P. Sati & Ors.

01 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3198-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition concerning partial non-payment of dues by NDMC, directing payment of interest within four weeks and leaving disputed claims to execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Contempt Petition Article 215 Constitution of India Execution Proceedings Interest Payment

Rajendra Prasad Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.

01 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3366-DB

The Delhi High Court held that it cannot direct the Central Administrative Tribunal to expedite hearing absent exceptional circumstances, dismissing the petition seeking such direction.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Writ of Mandamus Central Administrative Tribunal Time-bound disposal

Apeejay School v. Charu Lata Mata

01 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3241-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Apeejay School, upholding the order directing phased payment of statutory arrears under the 7th Central Pay Commission despite the school's financial constraints.

labor appeal_dismissed 7th Central Pay Commission arrears payment statutory dues financial constraints

SS Enterprises v. Office of the Commissioner Central Tax Delhi West and Anr

01 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3300-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a penalty order under the CGST Act after directing the department to provide all relied upon documents, holding that receipt of notice for at least one hearing satisfies fair opportunity requirements.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Goods and Services Tax Personal Hearing Relied Upon Documents

M/S Keshav Metals v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax

01 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3295-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of time-extension notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice GST portal Section 168A Notification No. 56/2023

Boon Rawd Brewery Co Ltd v. Yunnan Xiangkeng Trading Co. Ltd.

01 May 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:3334

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel a trademark registration obtained in bad faith that was identical to the petitioner’s well-known SINGHA mark, holding it liable to cause confusion and deception under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 bad faith trademark infringement Section 9(2)(a)