Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
M/S. EMGREEN IMPEX LIMITED v. M/S. OHM PIPES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the referral of a commercial dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, allowing the petitioner to seek appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6), while leaving all rights and contentions open.
DR DONALDS PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. INFER INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner one final opportunity to cross-examine a witness residing abroad via videoconferencing, emphasizing fair trial rights and procedural efficiency.
Surender Kumar Jain v. Deen Dayal Soni
The court directed expedited stamping of an impounded Power of Attorney to enable hearing of leave to defend arguments in an eviction petition, without allowing hearing before proper stamping.
Shimpy Sharma and Pooja Sharma v. M/S LSC Marketing India Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition challenging a commercial suit decree by recording an amicable settlement and directing payment of Rs. 14 lakhs to satisfy the decree and lift bank account attachment.
Trilok Chand & Ors. v. Bhagwat Prasad Rustagi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a formal amendment to the plaint clarifying property valuation for jurisdictional purposes at the final stage, emphasizing that delay alone is not a ground for refusal if no prejudice is caused.
Sukhbir Alias Kallu v. State of GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused involved in a daylight robbery impersonating police officials, emphasizing the accused's active role and absence of parity with co-accused granted bail.
Barkat Ali v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder and looting case due to weak circumstantial evidence, investigative deficiencies, and discrepancies in medico-legal records.
Tejinder Singh v. Beverely Singh
The Delhi High Court held that Family Courts have jurisdiction to grant interim injunctions restraining property sale in maintenance proceedings and directed the Family Court to decide the injunction application after due hearing.
SENATOR WOOD PVT. LTD. v. BABU LAL PATEL & ANR
The High Court held that a Trial Court must decide a review application before striking off a party's defence for non-compliance of the order under review, setting aside the impugned order and directing expeditious consideration of the review.
MS INOX WORLD INDUSTRIES PVT LTD v. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANE COMPANY LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that repudiation of an insurance claim does not preclude appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, limiting the court's inquiry to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and leaving arbitrability issues to the arbitral tribunal.
Virender Kumar v. Rekha Bhayana & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld summary judgment for recovery of possession and arrears of rent from 2018, holding that limitation excludes time bona fide spent in a court lacking jurisdiction and that unsubstantiated defenses cannot defeat admitted lease claims.
Uttam Kumar Daga v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Rohit Chauhan
The Delhi High Court held that a former director who resigned before issuance of dishonoured cheques cannot be held liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act without specific pleadings of control and responsibility.
Kuldip Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The High Court disposed of the writ petition after granting the petitioner special permission to remain in Delhi for one year without setting any precedent.
Facility Plus Estate Management Private Ltd. v. Innovision Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that electronic delivery of a scanned signed arbitral award to a party's counsel constitutes valid delivery under Section 31(5) of the Arbitration Act, starting the limitation period for challenging the award under Section 34.
Tarun Lata v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Central Administrative Tribunal for merits adjudication after the dismissal of a related writ petition, holding that interim orders alone cannot justify final disposal.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Tushar Deshwal
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing re-medical examination, holding that consistent medical board findings cannot be overturned merely on the basis of an external hospital report without proper factual and reasoned analysis.
Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. v. Sheela Devi
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order granting partial pension benefits without deciding the main issue of Old Pension Scheme applicability and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Union of India v. Satish Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing grant of Grade Pay Rs. 2800/- to Highly Skilled Workers Grade-I, rejecting the petitioner's seniority-based denial.
Vijay Kumar Sharma v. R.P. Sati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition concerning partial non-payment of dues by NDMC, directing payment of interest within four weeks and leaving disputed claims to execution proceedings.
Rajendra Prasad Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that it cannot direct the Central Administrative Tribunal to expedite hearing absent exceptional circumstances, dismissing the petition seeking such direction.