Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Punjab and Sind Bank v. Harish Bhasin

30 Apr 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:3822-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the DRAT's setting aside of an unreasoned DRT recovery order, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of reasoned judicial orders in debt recovery proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant reasoned order Debt Recovery Tribunal Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal recovery certificate

M/S. CHEMESTER FOOD INDUSTRY PVT. LTD. v. CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTRE AND ORS.

30 Apr 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3378-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful adjustment of an income tax refund against the full outstanding disputed demand due to the assessee's failure to deposit the prescribed 20% pre-condition amount for stay of demand.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 refund adjustment disputed demand stay of demand

Baby v. Office of Deputy Director Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

30 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3625

The High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to reject a judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC where admissions were not clear and substantive defenses existed, dismissing the revision petition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admission discretionary power Section 115 CPC

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. Lata Goel

30 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3098-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing capital gains deduction under Section 54F, holding that multiple floors in one building constitute a single residential house and that reassessment was barred by limitation due to no failure in disclosure.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 54F Income Tax Act capital gains deduction residential house definition reassessment limitation

Anupam Gian Vikas Pari Shad v. Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption Delhi & Anr.

30 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3103-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to expeditiously decide the petitioner's pending application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10BB under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without adjudicating the merits.

tax other Procedural condonation of delay Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act, 1961 Form 10BB

Surjeet Singh v. National Ins Co Ltd

30 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · AIR 2003 SC 1292
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court allowed the delayed appeal and remanded the matter to determine the vehicle owner's liability, holding that an owner who reasonably verifies a driver's license is not liable if the license is later found fake, with the insurer initially liable to compensate the victim.

motor_accident_claims / civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claims insurance liability fake driving license owner's liability

Conner Institute of Health Care and Research Center Pvt. Ltd v. DCIT, Circle- 73(1), Delhi

30 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3298-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside a Section 201(1) notice issued for alleged TDS default where the petitioner had validly deducted tax at a lower rate under a certificate from the Assessing Officer.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 201 Income Tax Act Tax Deducted at Source Assessee in default Lower deduction certificate

Oshin Suresh Upadhyay v. Kumar Gaurav Dubey

30 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · MAT.APP.(F.C.) 161/2025

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Family Court's order allowing withdrawal of a divorce petition due to inordinate delay and insufficient explanation for condonation of delay.

family appeal_dismissed Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(a) Section 24 condonation of delay

Om Gulati v. Rajiv Gulati HUF & Ors.

30 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3128-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging vacation of an interim injunction over disputed properties, holding that vague pleadings unsupported by documents do not establish a prima facie case for injunction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction prima facie case Hindu Undivided Family property ownership

Union of India v. Ramesh Kumar

30 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3116-DB

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a review DPC to consider the respondent's promotion post disciplinary penalty, clarifying that sealed cover recommendations are not acted upon after major penalty imposition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee Junior Administrative Grade disciplinary proceedings major penalty

Bank of Baroda & Ors. v. Ranjeet Kumar

30 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3195-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of disciplinary removal for failure to provide a hearing after tentative disagreement with inquiry findings, granting notional reinstatement for retiral benefits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice disagreement note opportunity of hearing

Ajit Sarin v. Citicorp Finance (India) Limited & Ors.

30 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3166-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the order directing the judgment debtor to file an affidavit of assets in execution proceedings despite procedural technicalities and prior filings by the decree holder.

civil appeal_dismissed Execution Petition Affidavit of Assets Order XXI Rule 41(2) Settlement Agreement

Prabha Devi v. State

30 Apr 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:3281

The Delhi High Court dismissed the belated application for expert examination of a Will's signatures in a probate appeal, holding that additional evidence cannot be admitted without satisfying conditions under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC.

civil other Indian Succession Act, 1925 Probate Will Additional evidence

Prakash Freight Movers Limited v. GSTO Ward-61 Department of Trade and Taxes & Anr.

30 Apr 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:3246-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST adjudication orders passed without valid service of Show Cause Notices uploaded under a less visible portal tab, directing fresh opportunity to be heard pending Supreme Court's decision on related notifications.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices tab Section 168A GST Act

Bed Prakash and Ors. v. Union of India and Others

30 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3121-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing publication of answer keys and inspection of OMR sheets before finalizing recruitment results and deferred training until representations were decided, emphasizing fairness in administrative recruitment processes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant answer key publication OMR sheet inspection recruitment fairness Central Administrative Tribunal

CDS Infra Projects Limited v. Reinforced Earth India Private Limited

30 Apr 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3127-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the commercial appeal for delay, holding that the appellant failed to provide sufficient cause to condone a 172-day delay in filing beyond the limitation period.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay sufficient cause commercial appeal limitation period

M/S SAI WATCHES PVT. CO. LTD. & ORS. v. M/S TITAN COMPANY LTD. & ORS.

30 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3232

The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory orders directing summons and court fee payment are not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC as they do not finally dispose of the suit.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interlocutory order court fee

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jayram Das

30 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3193
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

Appeal against an interim award of Rs. 50,000 under the Motor Vehicles Act is barred and dismissed as the amount in dispute is below Rs. 1 lakh threshold under Section 173(2).

civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140 Section 173(2) Claims Tribunal

Union of India and Ors. v. AIR CMDE BS Sabherwal, VSM (Retd)

30 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service-attributability and limiting its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

M/S SUN MOBILITY PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

30 Apr 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3191

The Delhi High Court directed the return of Lithium-ion batteries leased to unregistered e-rickshaws upon verification of ownership and compliance with registration norms, balancing proprietary rights with regulatory and environmental concerns.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Lithium-ion batteries battery leasing e-rickshaws unregistered vehicles