Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Harash Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

30 Apr 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:3140
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a serious sexual assault and extortion case, holding that the arrest was lawful and bail would prejudice ongoing investigation and victim safety.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail grounds of arrest Article 22(1) Constitution sexual assault

Prince Khan v. Pawan Kumar

30 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3138

The Delhi High Court directed restoration of the defendant's defense and acceptance of his written statement in a possession suit after an admission decree was passed based on a written statement not formally on record in the Commercial Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant admission decree written statement Commercial Court Order XII Rule 6 CPC

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated v. Controller General of Patents, Design, Trademark and Geographical Indications

30 Apr 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:3096

The Delhi High Court held that the date of grant of a patent is the date the Controller signs the grant order, rendering any Pre-Grant Opposition filed thereafter invalid and the Controller functus officio.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Pre-Grant Opposition Patents Act, 1970 date of grant Controller of Patents

Sunita Kumari Jat v. Union of India & Ors.

30 Apr 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:4198-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as the respondents complied with the earlier order by passing a fresh transfer order in accordance with the petitioner’s preferences.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition transfer order administrative transfer representation against transfer

Pinnacle Finance Pvt. Ltd. v. Sol Ltd.

29 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3719

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve SOL Limited under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 after completion of winding up and asset distribution, while withholding payment to a security agency pending FIR investigation.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 481 winding up company dissolution

M/S K.K. Constructions v. New Delhi Municipal Council

29 Apr 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:3418
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that conciliation is optional under the contract and limited its Section 11 scrutiny to prima facie existence of arbitration agreement, appointing an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator conciliation optional judicial scrutiny arbitration

FIITJEE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAININGS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)

29 Apr 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:3039-DB

The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing Form 10B due to genuine medical hardship must be condoned under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing a liberal approach to advance substantial justice.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act condonation of delay genuine hardship Form 10B

Shamim Akhtar Tamanna v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3263-DB

The Delhi High Court held that it will not direct the Central Administrative Tribunal to prioritize or expedite hearing of suspension order challenges, emphasizing that case management is within the Tribunal's discretion and constitutional courts should intervene only in exceptional circumstances.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction Central Administrative Tribunal case management

State NCT of Delhi v. Satya Narayan

29 Apr 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:3379

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal upholding the acquittal of a police officer due to failure of prosecution to prove the essential element of demand of illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 demand of illegal gratification marked currency notes Section 20 PC Act presumption

Ashish @ Deva v. State (NCT of Delhi)

29 Apr 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3035

Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused under MCOCA after finding insufficient prima facie evidence of his involvement in organised crime and applying the reasonable satisfaction test under Section 21(4) of MCOCA.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant MCOCA bail organised crime syndicate Section 21(4) MCOCA

Rajeev Saxena v. State

29 Apr 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:3034

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings against a public servant due to inordinate delay in grant of mandatory sanction under Section 197 CrPC, upholding the right to speedy trial under Article 21.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC sanction for prosecution public servant right to speedy trial

Ram Kishan Pal Singh v. Kumud Chandra Joshi Kumar & Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3135

The Delhi High Court remanded a motor accident claim for fresh adjudication on loss of income and earning capacity, allowing additional evidence and condoning delay in filing the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of income loss of earning capacity

M/S Ram Niwas Goel v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

29 Apr 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:3144

The Delhi High Court held that removal of a contractor from the approved list without issuing a Show Cause Notice and providing an opportunity of hearing violates natural justice and set aside the impugned orders with directions for due process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice natural justice debarment contractor enlistment

Ram Raghubir Singhal v. Usha Saini & Anr.

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3154
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to not treat limitation and bar issues as preliminary issues in an eviction suit, dismissing the petition challenging this order.

civil petition_dismissed Order II Rule 2 CPC Section 11 CPC limitation preliminary issues

Rajnish Gupta v. Puneet Sarang

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3155

The Court held that summons in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC must be issued in the prescribed form and allowed the petitioner liberty to seek correction of procedural irregularity before the Trial Court.

civil other summary suit Order XXXVII CPC issuance of summons procedural irregularity

Union of India v. Bimla Devi

29 Apr 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3188-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of a deceased Temporary Status Casual Labour's family to pensionary benefits treating him as regularized from death, limiting arrears to three years prior to claim due to delay.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Temporary Status Casual Labour Regularization Pensionary Benefits Family Pension

Tabassum & Anr v. Mohd Nadeem

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3156

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants a final opportunity to file their written statement despite delay, imposing costs and directing expeditious trial disposal under its supervisory jurisdiction.

civil petition_allowed Article 227 of Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction written statement closure of right

M/S D S GLOBAL PVT LTD v. M/S IND SYNERGY LTD

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3157

The Delhi High Court held that in execution proceedings under Order XXI Rules 37 and 38 CPC, procedural protocol including issuance of show cause notice must be followed before issuing arrest warrants against company directors, but appearance through counsel and filing of reply may suffice in lieu of formal notice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Order XXI Rule 38 CPC execution proceedings warrant of arrest

Suman Sharma v. Mahender Sharma & Ors.

29 Apr 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:3158

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to waive court costs imposed on an indigent petitioner whose husband was in arrears of maintenance, directing the trial court to proceed in accordance with law.

civil petition_allowed Significant indigent litigant waiver of costs maintenance arrears legal aid counsel

M/S RUCHIR SALES v. M/S ANIL PACKAGING INDUSTRIES AND ORS

29 Apr 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:3194

The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 115 CPC challenging dismissal of impleadment application, holding revision barred by proviso to Section 115 CPC and granting liberty to pursue alternate remedies.

civil appeal_dismissed Section 115 CPC impleadment revision petition proviso to Section 115