Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Santosh Kumari & Anr. v. Dharmendra Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order directing a husband to pay Rs.10,000 monthly maintenance to his wife and minor daughter, affirming the principles for fixing maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
S V Chauhan v. Central Bureau of Investigation; Lajpat Chandolia v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against bank officials for conspiracy and corruption, holding that a prima facie case existed and inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly.
S. P. Dhir v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a public servant for misappropriation of funds, affirming limited judicial review over disciplinary findings and punishment proportionality.
Babu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
This judgment records the decision date and refers to another judgment for detailed reasoning in a set of connected criminal appeals before the Delhi High Court.
Babu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
This document is a procedural order referencing another judgment dated 07.09.2015 in Crl.A. No.129/2015 without substantive content.
Babu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The judgment text provided is a brief order referencing another decision without substantive content or reasoning.
Babu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
This judgment records the decision date and references another judgment for detailed reasoning in a set of connected criminal appeals before the Delhi High Court.
Babu v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The judgment records the decision date and refers to another judgment for detailed reasoning in connected criminal appeals before the Delhi High Court.
Abid v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of six appellants for murder and related offences based on credible ocular and medical evidence, rejecting their plea of self-defense and challenges to investigation and witness reliability.
Kumari Selja v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Directorate of Estates can terminate licenses of government bungalows allotted by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat, limiting former Union Cabinet Ministers who are Rajya Sabha members to Type VII accommodation, and expunged unnecessary stigmatic observations from the earlier judgment.
Saheli Marbles Private Limited v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
The Delhi High Court held that directors receiving remuneration can be employees under the EPF Act, dismissing the appeal of Saheli Marbles Pvt. Ltd. and affirming the applicability of the Act.
Vijay Kumar Tiwari v. Lt. Governor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Industrial Tribunal cannot dismiss an approval application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act solely for non-examination of the enquiry officer if the enquiry report is undisputed, and set aside a removal order as disproportionate, awarding compensation instead of reinstatement.
Dr. Y.S. Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for lack of locus-standi, holding that a petitioner with personal disputes cannot espouse a public interest cause.
Ishwar Singh & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Nem Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served plus a fine, considering the settlement and mitigating factors.
Nem Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court affirmed the conviction under Section 307 IPC but modified the sentence based on settlement and mitigating factors, while dismissing the appellant's other pending appeal.
Kamruddin @ Gudda v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' convictions under Sections 325/323/341/34 IPC but modified their sentences to the period already undergone in view of compromise and mitigating factors.
Kamruddin @ Gudda v. State
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellants' convictions under Sections 325/323/341 IPC but modified their sentence to the period already served, considering the compromise and compensation paid to the victims.
Kumari Selja v. Union of India; Ambika Soni v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Directorate of Estates has authority to terminate government bungalow licenses allotted by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat and restricted former Union Cabinet Ministers' entitlement to Type VII accommodation, while expunging unnecessary stigmatic observations from the earlier judgment.
Rajat Vikas v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 482 CrPC based on an amicable settlement and compensation paid by the petitioner, emphasizing the inherent power to prevent abuse of process in cases with remote likelihood of conviction.