Delhi High Court

34,294 judgments

Year:

Central Board of Trustees, EPF v. M/S Glade Drugs & Nutraceuticals Pvt Ltd

19 May 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:4284

The Delhi High Court held that orders passed independently under Section 7Q of the EPF Act imposing interest on delayed PF payments are not appealable under Section 7I, setting aside the EPFAT's order allowing such appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7Q Section 14B Section 7I

Divyanshu Nandwani v. Kamal Kishore Nandwani

19 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4266
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition and related reliefs, holding that the plaint failed to disclose a cause of action due to lack of specific pleading on ancestral or HUF character of the properties, and rejected the plaint in entirety under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC partition suit ancestral property Hindu Undivided Family

Sonia Chhabra & Anr v. Shanta Grover & Ors

19 May 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4013

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging dismissal of a Section 6 Specific Relief Act suit, holding that the petitioners failed to prove illegal dispossession and no jurisdictional error was committed by the trial court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act dispossession possession revision jurisdiction

Aditya Jain v. Sai Motors

19 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4260

The Delhi High Court condoned delay and allowed withdrawal of petitions with liberty to raise all contentions before the trial court, directing expeditious disposal of the pending suit.

civil petition_allowed condonation of delay withdrawal of petition liberty to raise contentions expeditious disposal

Shri Gulab Singh v. M/S Bharat Timber Traders & Ors.

19 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4257
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders such as dismissal of amendment applications that do not finally dispose of the suit.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC Revision jurisdiction Interlocutory order Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Pavan Paswan v. Ranjeet Yadav & Ors

19 May 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4015

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the motor accident claim appeal, directing enhanced compensation for 70% functional disability, future prosthetic limb costs, pain and suffering, attendant charges, loss of amenities, and disfigurement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement functional disability prosthetic limb maintenance

Chander Mohan Khandelwal v. Hemant Wadhwa

19 May 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:3987

The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging a registered Sale Deed on the basis of an alleged collateral oral agreement inconsistent with the deed does not disclose a cause of action and is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Sections 91 and 92 Indian Evidence Act registered Sale Deed cause of action

Ministry of Finance through Secretary v. Shri Shahid Meezan

19 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4021-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order setting aside deemed resignation of a government employee on foreign deputation, clarifying that such resignation orders under the 2008 O.M. apply prospectively and VRS applications must be considered on merits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant deemed resignation Office Memorandum 29.02.2008 foreign deputation Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Qamar Jahan v. Union of India

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4182-DB

The Delhi High Court approved a procedural framework for Customs detention of passenger goods, ordered release of petitioner’s gold jewellery with waiver of storage charges, and directed compliance pending amendment of the Baggage Rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs detention Baggage Rules 2016 Standard Operating Procedure show cause notice waiver

M/S GAYATRI FURNITURE v. Union of India & Ors.

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4188-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to non-visibility of the show cause notice on the GST portal, directing fresh hearing while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST portal show cause notice natural justice Section 168A Central GST Act

Rasi Innovation Pvt Ltd v. Superintendent, Ward 84, Delhi GST & Anr.

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4051-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a vague show cause notice lacking specific statutory references is legally untenable and set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration, limiting cancellation to the date of the notice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation show cause notice retrospective cancellation Goods and Services Tax Act

JCO GAS PIPE LIMITED v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 91 ZONE 8

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4047-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order for lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Section 168A GST Act Notification No. 56/2023

Sri Ganpati Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST, Delhi West

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4052-DB

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration and correction of GST demand orders containing errors and duplication after affording a personal hearing to the petitioner.

administrative other Input Tax Credit Show Cause Notice GST Orders-in-Original

JCO GAS PIPE LIMITED v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 91 ZONE 8

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4050-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a GST adjudication order, declined writ interference, and left the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act open pending Supreme Court adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Principles of Natural Justice

Devi Charan v. New-Delhi Municipal Council

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4061-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under the Street Vendors Act, substitution of a vending certificate upon the vendor's death is limited to the spouse or dependent child, dismissing the petition of a non-dependent son seeking such substitution.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 certificate of vending substitution dependent child

Shaurya Suneja v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

19 May 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:4028

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under rash and negligent driving charges based on a voluntary settlement and compensation paid to the victim, affirming the court's power to end proceedings in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 528 BNS Article 226 Constitution

National Council of Educational Research and Training v. Parvesh Sharma

19 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4018-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reservation details must be clearly specified in recruitment advertisements, set aside the quashing of the entire advertisement, and directed re-advertisement of the affected post with costs awarded to the aggrieved candidate.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation recruitment advertisement PGT Commerce Central Administrative Tribunal

R H A ENTERPRISES v. Union of India & Ors.

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4049-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a GST show cause notice and related order, directing the petitioner to file an appeal and leaving the validity of impugned notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.

tax petition_dismissed Significant show cause notice GST portal Section 168A CGST Act validity of notifications

Shashi Kumar Choudhary v. Deputy Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence Delhi Zonal Unit & Anr.

19 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4045-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a communication computing tax and penalty is not an adjudication order under the CGST Act and directed issuance of a Show Cause Notice before any demand can be raised.

tax petition_dismissed CGST Act, 2017 Show Cause Notice Penalty under GST Adjudication order

Jasuja Electronics v. Empire Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4157

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to set aside an ex parte order, holding that the petitioner failed to provide a genuine explanation for delay and cannot shift responsibility to counsel despite Covid-19 disruptions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant ex parte order setting aside ex parte Covid-19 pandemic delay in appearance