Delhi High Court

34,828 judgments

Year:

Jasuja Electronics v. Empire Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4157

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to set aside an ex parte order, holding that the petitioner failed to provide a genuine explanation for delay and cannot shift responsibility to counsel despite Covid-19 disruptions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant ex parte order setting aside ex parte Covid-19 pandemic delay in appearance

U P State Road Transport Corporation v. Shivam Yadav & Anr.

19 May 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4014
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award against the State Road Transport Corporation, affirming negligence of the bus driver, validating disability assessment, and enhancing certain heads of compensation and interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Motor Accident Claims Negligence

Union of India & Ors. v. Major Anish Muralidhar

19 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attribution to military service and limiting writ review to legal errors only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Neeraj Kohli v. The State & Anr.

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4114

In an uncontested petition for Letters of Administration, exemption from Administration and Surety Bonds requires a specific application before the Trial Court, which must be decided after hearing both parties.

civil other Procedural Letters of Administration Administration Bond Surety Bond Probate Court

Prem Nath Sarup (Exports) Pvt Ltd v. Sumit Agarwal

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4113

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a restoration application for a commercial suit due to inordinate delay and negligence of counsel, affirming that litigants bear responsibility for tracking their cases.

civil petition_dismissed Significant restoration of suit condonation of delay negligence of counsel non-appearance

M/S MN AUTOMOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED v. GURIQBAL SINGH & ANR

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4112

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to furnish security instead of depositing rent arrears as directed, emphasizing strict compliance with court orders and rejecting vague attempts to delay proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Section 151 CPC arrears of rent security in lieu of deposit extension of time

Sudesh Chhikara v. Divisional Commissioner, Delhi & Ors.

19 May 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:4081-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against eviction under the Senior Citizens Act, holding that summary proceedings with proper findings are valid and title disputes must be decided by civil courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Senior Citizens Act, 2007 eviction summary proceedings District Magistrate

Sanjay Goel v. SAG Infrastructure Developers Pvt Ltd & Anr

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4110

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow recall of a witness for further cross-examination under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC in the interest of justice despite procedural irregularities.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Section 151 CPC recall of witness cross-examination

Harkesh Bhardwaj & Anr. v. Krishna Nand

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4109
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the order directing warrants of arrest in execution proceedings for non-compliance with statutory provisions and protocols, allowing execution to proceed with safeguards.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Execution Petition Warrant of Arrest Order XXI CPC Section 51 CPC

Amar Sen & Anr. v. Ajit Kumar Sharma

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4108

The Delhi High Court held that the timeline for filing written statements in civil suits is directory, not mandatory, and set aside the Trial Court's order striking off defence for belated filing without sufficient cause.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement condonation of delay Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Order VIII Rule 10 CPC

Tinku Gupta v. Narender Kumar Gupta

19 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4100

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging conditional leave to defend in a summary suit but waived costs and granted one month to deposit the directed amount considering the petitioner’s financial condition.

civil appeal_dismissed summary suit leave to defend deposit of amount Section 151 CPC

Lt Col Badal Chandra Roy Retd v. Union of India & Ors.

19 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:4071-DB

The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking disability pension on the ground that jurisdiction lies with the Armed Forces Tribunal and permitted the petitioner to file the claim there.

administrative appeal_dismissed disability pension armed forces tribunal jurisdiction writ petition

JAMMU & KASHMIR ECONOMIC RECONSTRUCTION AGENCY v. M/S SIMPLEX PROJECTS LIMITED

19 May 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:4076

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner's claim for liquidated damages on the ground that the clause was penal and not a genuine pre-estimate of damages, and that unilateral adjustment without arbitral adjudication was impermissible.

civil petition_dismissed Significant liquidated damages penalty clause Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge

Jitender Dixit @ Bantu v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

19 May 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:4038
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner under MCOCA, emphasizing the constitutional right to a speedy trial and diluting stringent statutory bail conditions due to prolonged pre-trial detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail MCOCA prolonged incarceration right to speedy trial

Dura-Line India Pvt Ltd v. Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd.

19 May 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:4036
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a patent for a non-metallic pipe with a co-extruded tracer cable and held that the defendant infringed the patent and registered design.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent Infringement Co-extrusion Tracer Cable Novelty

Mrs X v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

19 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4010

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to direct FIR registration where alternate efficacious remedies exist, and dismissed the petition seeking mandamus against the petitioner’s husband for circulating personal pictures.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant FIR registration writ jurisdiction mandamus alternate remedies

Mohd Saif @ Saif Qureshi & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

19 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4008

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 376(2)(n), 417, and 506 IPC after the parties married and the prosecutrix withdrew prosecution, emphasizing the welfare of their minor child.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 376(2)(n) IPC Section 417 IPC Section 506 IPC

Deepak Rawat v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4006

The Delhi High Court set aside a vague parole rejection order for lack of specific reasons and remanded the matter for a fresh reasoned decision.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant parole jail conduct vague order reasoned order

Monika Tiwari and Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors

19 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4007

The Delhi High Court allowed recording of petitioners' statements via video conferencing under Section 164 CrPC to protect their lives and directed local police protection.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 164 CrPC video conferencing protection of life inter-caste marriage

Sandeep v. State NCT of Delhi

19 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4001

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a theft case subject to conditions of cooperation with investigation and furnishing bond.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail theft Section 305 BNS personal bond