Delhi High Court
76,343 judgments
Tara Batra v. Punam A Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's dismissal of applications for interrogatories and discovery, holding that such procedural tools must be liberally allowed if relevant and expedient to fairly adjudicate the suit.
Seema Seth v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 39(4), Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Section 148 notice and assessment order, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies under the Income Tax Act.
MS Shoes East Limited v. Harvest Financial Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a decree enforcement petition to enable the decree holder to raise the claim before the Official Liquidator during liquidation proceedings.
Arindam Chaudhuri v. Zest Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that interlocutory orders not specifically appealable under Order XLIII CPC are not maintainable as appeals under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
Hamilton Heights Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Krishna Build Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting the petitioner's challenge based on alleged overbilling and patent illegality, emphasizing limited judicial interference with arbitration awards.
Tara Batra v. Punam A Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside trial court orders dismissing applications for interrogatories and discovery in a suit concerning alleged tampering of fixed deposits, emphasizing liberal allowance of procedural tools under Order XI CPC to shorten litigation.
Bhupinder Singh Bullar v. Directorate of Gurdwara Elections & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed exclusion of the appellant's withdrawn vote and ordered continuation of the co-option election process under the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1971 with fixed timelines for related proceedings.
Sterlite Grid 20 Limited v. PFC Consulting Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of Sterlite Grid 20 Limited's bid on conflict of interest grounds due to common directorship with another bidder, affirming the reasonableness of the tender authority's decision under Clause 2.1.[5] of the RfQ.
TO THE NEW PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOLDEN TOWER INFRATECH LTD
The Delhi High Court referred the disputes over specified waiver amounts between the parties to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Satpal Singh v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL alleging illegal construction for lack of prima facie evidence and held that vague, unsubstantiated allegations without prior verification do not warrant judicial intervention.
Arindam Chaudhuri v. Zest Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that appeals under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act lie only against orders specifically enumerated under Order XLIII CPC, dismissing appeals against interlocutory orders not so enumerated as not maintainable.
Eaton Power Quality Pvt Ltd v. Competition Commission of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CCI's power to review and recall its order excluding Eaton from White Labelling remedies in a Combination approval, dismissing Eaton's writ petition for lack of procedural compliance and arbitrariness.
Adarsh Subhash Tayal College of Education v. Sh Vineet Josm & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple contempt petitions by directing respondents to pay costs for delayed compliance with judicial directions, with costs to be used for a social welfare fund.
M/S. UPS INVERTER.COM & ANR. v. Union of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court held that exporters inadvertently claiming duty drawback under the wrong column during GST transitional period are entitled to IGST refund, directing verification and refund without undue denial.
Vivaan Solar Pvt. Ltd. v. Northern Central Railways & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, rejecting the respondent Railways' claim to appoint the arbitrator, emphasizing impartiality in arbitration appointments.
Satender Jain v. Satya Narain Sanjiv Gupta HUF
The Delhi High Court held that eviction proceedings against unauthorized occupants do not require permission under Section 19 of the Slum Areas Act, and upheld the decree for possession and damages while waiving interest on mesne profits.
Jhabua Power Limited v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate by 18 months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
Amit Talwar and Ors. v. Vivek Talwar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a family settlement allowing limited use of 'PARKOVIC' and permitted withdrawal against other defendants.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Diamond Product Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award assessing fire insurance stock loss based on manufacturing and trading accounts, rejecting the insurer's challenge of patent illegality.
CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT. LTD. v. M/S SARITA MULTIPLEX PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's order directing the lessee to continue depositing rent pending arbitration, holding that occupation without surrender does not excuse rent payment despite alleged breaches and Force Majeure claims.