Delhi High Court
33,852 judgments
Rajiv Dawar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the administrative order transferring all complaints and investigation from EOW to SFIO, holding that the FIR was quashed only against one accused and investigations against others must continue with EOW.
Sagar Gambhir v. The State Govt. of Not of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Malini Israni v. Ved Prakash Israni
The Delhi High Court directed that evidence in the Family Court case be recorded by the Trial Court itself to ensure expeditious disposal, rejecting the petitioner's claim of improper open recording by a Local Commissioner.
Shri Sunil Pasricha & Anr. v. Shri Shivam Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretionary order allowing the plaintiff to place additional documents on record under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC, holding that absence of stated reasonable cause at the plaint stage does not warrant interference under Article 227 if no prejudice or perversity is shown.
Vansh Taluja & Anr. v. Bhupinder Kumar Taluja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court passed a preliminary decree partitioning the estate of a deceased among natural heirs, excluding a property proven to be personal, and directed rent sharing and disclosure of movable assets.
Under Armour Inc v. Anish Agarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed Under Armour's appeal, holding that the respondents' use of 'AERO ARMOUR' marks is prima facie deceptively similar to 'UNDER ARMOUR', entitling the appellant to interim relief against trademark infringement.
Amrik Kaur v. Competent Authority New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking urgent interim relief and directed the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal for restoration and interim relief in an appeal dismissed in default under SAFEMA.
M/S J RAMAN AND COMPANY & ORS. v. M/S RKG POLYMERS
The High Court allowed the petitioners liberty to move a fresh application for expert opinion on disputed signatures after the Trial Court dismissed their earlier application despite prior liberty to refile.
Sher Singh v. The Chairman NDMC
The Delhi High Court held that failure to file a written statement does not mandate judgment for the plaintiff under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC; damages must be proved by evidence and the court has discretion to require proof and allow cross-examination.
Hands On Hands Ventures Private Limited v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of limitation-extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Puneet Goyal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking GST demand order passed without considering the petitioner’s reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving open the question of validity of limitation-extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
Hands On Hands Ventures Private Limited v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing due to procedural lapses in portal communication, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.
Sujata Chandra v. Ram Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit must be filed in the court having jurisdiction over the subordinate office where the cause of action arose, not the court of the principal office, and disposed of the petition following respondents' concession on lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Mukesh Kumar Bhardwaj v. Gauri Shankar Through Lrs & Anr
Revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, as reiterated by the Delhi High Court in dismissing the petition challenging denial of permission to file documents.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-7 v. Third Generation Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of protective additions under Section 68 against a conduit company where substantive additions were made in the hands of ultimate beneficiaries, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
Jagdeep Singh Sandhu v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that while it cannot direct amendment of the BSF Act to provide statutory appeal, it directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s statutory petition under Section 117(2) within six weeks and stayed termination proceedings pending that decision.
Sh Deepak Arora & Ors. v. Smt Kavita Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and condonation application filed after an inordinate delay, holding that the Will not pleaded or proved during the suit cannot be set up belatedly, and undertakings to vacate the property bar claims under the Will.
Vinod Kumari Bhalla v. Anil Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that legal heirs are entitled to equal shares under intestate succession, allowed abandonment of the Will, and directed partition by sale with mediation to resolve disputes.
M/S R.S. OVERSEAS v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, ICD, TKD
The Delhi High Court held that delay in issuance of a Show Cause Notice under Rule 16 of the Duty Drawback Rules does not invalidate proceedings absent prescribed limitation, and directed the petitioner to avail statutory appellate remedies rather than writ relief.
Mahabir Traders v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed release of an impounded vehicle upon compliance with prescribed rules and payment of charges, restraining scrapping during proceedings.