Delhi High Court

75,670 judgments

Year:

Dr. Hamidullah Bhat v. Central Bureau of Investigation

22 Nov 2021 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2021:DHC:3751
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that partial exoneration in departmental inquiry does not bar criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act and refused to stay the trial proceedings against Dr. Hamidullah Bhat.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry criminal prosecution disproportionate assets stay of proceedings

Rajwinder Kaur & Anr v. Central Adoption Resource Authority

22 Nov 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3756

The Delhi High Court directed CARA to implement the Adoption (Amendment) Regulations, 2021 effectively to ensure timely issuance of NOCs for inter-country adoptions under HAMA with transparency and proper coordination among all stakeholders.

family other Significant inter-country adoption No Objection Certificate Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 Adoption (Amendment) Regulations, 2021

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD v. M/S KONE ELEVATORS INDIA PVT. LTD

22 Nov 2021 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2021:DHC:3746

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for failing to adjudicate the entitlement to Input Tax Credit on excise duty under GST, affirming GST applicability and DMRC's liability to reimburse GST paid by Kone.

civil other Significant GST applicability Input Tax Credit Excise duty VAT vs GST

DR SHUBHAMKAR MISHRA & ANR. v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS.

22 Nov 2021 · D. N. Patel; Jyoti Singh · 2021:DHC:3750-DB

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining sealing of a Diagnostic Centre on residential property under MPD-2021 pending disposal of the land use conversion application and writ petition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Master Plan for Delhi 2021 mixed land use Diagnostic Centre interim relief

Sharda Gupta & Ors. v. Registrar of Co-operative Societies & Ors.

22 Nov 2021 · D. N. Patel; Jyoti Singh · 2021:DHC:3761-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition with liberty to pursue remedies under Section 70 of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003.

administrative appeal_allowed writ petition withdrawal liberty to pursue remedy Section 70

Poonam Devi & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi

22 Nov 2021 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2021:DHC:3766

The Delhi High Court set aside the absconder declaration against petitioners under Section 82 Cr.P.C. due to bona fide non-appearance caused by COVID-19 lockdown, subject to their undertaking to appear regularly before the Trial Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 82 Cr.P.C. absconder declaration non-appearance COVID-19 lockdown

Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.

18 Nov 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:3729

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from EPC Agreements for solar power projects between Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. and Lohia group companies.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 9 Section 12

Praveen Jain & Anr. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

18 Nov 2021 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2021:DHC:3724

The Delhi High Court directed the South Delhi Municipal Corporation to expeditiously decide on revocation of a sanctioned building plan and stay construction pending such decision, while preserving parties' rights to legal remedies.

administrative other sanctioned building plan revocation construction activity municipal authority

Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.

18 Nov 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:3730

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from EPC Agreements related to Solar Power Plants, following parties' consensus on arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 9 EPC Agreement

Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.

18 Nov 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:3731

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from EPC Agreements for solar power projects, facilitating arbitration as agreed by the parties.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 9 Section 12

M/S HIMGIRI AUTOMOBILES PRIVATE LIMITED v. RAM AVTAR YADAV & ORS.

18 Nov 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:3734

The Delhi High Court referred the parties' disputes to arbitration under DIAC rules, permitting respondents to file counterclaims, and disposed of the petition without commenting on merits.

civil petition_allowed arbitration counterclaims Delhi International Arbitration Centre reference to arbitration

M/s Chetak International Cargo Limited v. Official Liquidator

18 Nov 2021 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:3741

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for dissolution of a solvent company under members’ voluntary liquidation after statutory compliance and Official Liquidator’s satisfaction, despite non-receipt of Income Tax NOC.

corporate petition_allowed members’ voluntary liquidation Companies Act 1956 Official Liquidator Declaration of Solvency

Prem Lal Singh Yadav v. Delhi Development Authority

18 Nov 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:3723

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, confirming the arbitrator proposed by the respondent with the petitioner's consent despite procedural irregularities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment Section 12 disclosure Perkins Eastman Architects

Living Media India Limited v. Abhishek Agarwal & Ors.

18 Nov 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:3725

The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a valid settlement agreement and directed refund of the entire court fee following amicable settlement.

civil appeal_allowed settlement agreement permanent injunction trademark infringement court fee refund

Manoj Kumar Gope & Ors. v. Intelligence Bureau

18 Nov 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:3736-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order dismissing CAPF personnel’s plea for absorption in the Intelligence Bureau and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the Screening Committee due to procedural lapses.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Intelligence Bureau Central Armed Police Forces deputation absorption

Mayank Bhasin v. Shikha Bhasin

18 Nov 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:3738-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal by suspending the impugned order subject to the appellant’s undertaking to pay Rs. 35 lakhs by a specified date and condoned the delay in filing the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Memorandum of Settlement payment undertaking condonation of delay interim relief

Ved Prakash v. Aashi Tanwar

18 Nov 2021 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2021:DHC:3735

The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in a partition suit, holding that the petitioner’s claim required evidence and the suit could not be dismissed at the preliminary stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint partition suit cause of action

Megha Bottling and Ors. v. Bankey Behari Foods

18 Nov 2021 · Rajiv Shakdher; Talwant Singh · 2021:DHC:3737-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside orders dismissing interim applications under Order XXXIX CPC and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the existing interim order to continue pending disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural Order XXXIX CPC interim application commercial suit remand

M/S VIJAY STEELCON PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (GST) DELHI EAST & ORS.

18 Nov 2021 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:3739-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging seizure and tax recovery, holding that voluntary deposit under Section 74(5) of the CGST Act precludes claims of coercion or invalidity of proceedings.

tax petition_dismissed Significant CGST Act 2017 search and seizure voluntary deposit Section 74(5)

Rays Power Experts Pvt. Ltd. v. Lohia Gramin Vikas Pvt. Ltd.

18 Nov 2021 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2021:DHC:3732

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from EPC Agreements for solar power projects, affirming the binding nature of the arbitration clause.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 9 EPC Agreement