Delhi High Court

33,852 judgments

Year:

Veetee Fine Foods Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

26 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4449

The Delhi High Court directed the Regional Director to conduct hearings and decide the petitioner's application for company conversion within a specified timeframe, ensuring a time-bound and speaking order.

corporate other Companies Act, 2013 conversion of company public listed to private limited time-bound decision

Adama India Private Limited v. S.S. Packaging Industries Pvt Ltd

26 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4441

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to allow a defendant to file additional documents after an eleven-year delay, emphasizing the need for a cogent explanation and preventing prejudice and delay in trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A CPC filing additional documents belated stage discretion of court

Vishal v. Krishan Lamba

26 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4462

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint to include a missing plot number due to typographical error, dismissing the petition challenging it.

civil petition_dismissed Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of plaint typographical error mandatory injunction

Debashish Chakravartty v. Sabyasachi Chakravartty

26 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4464

The High Court directed the Trial Court to promptly consider enforcement of a final injunction order under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC without undue delay, emphasizing procedural efficiency and compliance.

civil other injunction Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC Order XXXIX Rule 2 CPC Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC

Dr. Rita Bakshi v. Seema Bajaj

26 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4465

The High Court permitted the petitioner to personally give evidence in a civil suit, disallowed examination through an unstamped power of attorney, and imposed costs for delay.

civil petition_allowed examination of witness special power of attorney unstamped document Article 227 Constitution of India

Mohd Mubarak v. Masjid Noor Ahmed Wakf

26 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4468
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Court directed the trial court to grant the petitioner one final opportunity to lead evidence and expedite disposal of the execution petition in line with Supreme Court guidelines.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural execution petition objector leading evidence final opportunity

KRB Enterprises & Ors. v. M/S KRBL Limited

26 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4364-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining appellants from using the deceptively similar mark 'KRB' to the respondent's registered trademark 'KRBL', affirming protection under Class 35 against allied goods and emphasizing proper exercise of discretion in granting injunctions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Trademark infringement Interim injunction Trade Marks Act, 1999 Class 30 and Class 35

Arun Jain & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

26 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4734

The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the Court's power to quash proceedings to promote peace.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act amicable settlement

Ramesh Sethi & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

26 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4482

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, relying on the parties' consent and Supreme Court precedents.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Brahmbhatt v. The State NCT of Delhi

26 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4383

The Delhi High Court allowed furlough to a life-convict after 20 years of incarceration, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of furlough and the petitioner’s familial responsibilities.

criminal petition_allowed Significant furlough prolonged incarceration Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

SI/STENO DIGAMBER SINGH v. THE UOI & ANR

26 May 2025 · NAVIN CHAWLA; SHALINDER KAUR · 2025:DHC:4359-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary findings and punishment against a BSF personnel for unauthorized absence without sanctioned leave, emphasizing administrative discretion in leave matters and judicial restraint in interfering with punishment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant BSF Act 1968 absence without leave disciplinary action leave sanction

Deepak v. State of NCT of Delhi

26 May 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4412

The Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to a petitioner accused of fraud-related offences, subject to stringent conditions to ensure trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed interim bail medical grounds Hypertension Chronic Kidney Disease

Satbir Singh v. UOI & Anr

26 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4390-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the BSF disciplinary conviction for sodomy, ruling that procedural fairness was observed and absence of medical evidence did not vitiate the departmental proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Departmental disciplinary proceedings Border Security Force Act Article 226 Judicial review

SCC Infrastructure Private Limited v. RITES Limited & Anr.

26 May 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:4917
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that a contractual clause barring arbitration if the appointing authority fails to appoint an arbitrator is unenforceable, and appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while also holding the petition within limitation considering COVID extensions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator Limitation period COVID extension Arbitration clause interpretation

Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Dilip Bhagwan Bhai Patel

26 May 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:4874
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator Scope of judicial scrutiny Prima facie existence of arbitration agreement

Connect Residuary Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner, Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Anr.

26 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4615-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking GST adjudication order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Show Cause Notice Non-speaking order Natural justice

SI/STENO DIGAMBER SINGH v. THE UOI & ANR

26 May 2025 · NAVIN CHAWLA; SHALINDER KAUR · 2025:DHC:4362-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary conviction of a BSF officer for insubordination, limiting judicial interference to procedural fairness and rejecting claims of fabricated evidence and perjury raised belatedly.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings Border Security Force Act General Security Force Court principles of natural justice

Ramakrushna Sasmal v. Union of India & Ors.

23 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1125-DB

The High Court allowed a limited modification of its earlier judgment to correct the record of officers present during the hearing without affecting the substantive outcome.

other other Procedural modification of judgment clerical error correction of record appearance of officers

SQN LDR SWATI PRAKASH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

23 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3689-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions to the Armed Forces Tribunal and reliefs related to mobile phone seizure and Permanent Commission, holding that such matters are not amenable to writ jurisdiction without legal basis.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition Armed Forces Tribunal Court of Inquiry Permanent Commission

Harkirat Singh Sodhi v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4305

The Delhi High Court set aside the order directing FIR registration for a missing registered Revocation Deed, holding that criminal investigation is unwarranted when the document copy is in possession and probate proceedings are pending.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Revocation Deed Probate proceedings Registered Will