Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Mahabir Traders v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

22 May 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:4422

The Delhi High Court directed release of an impounded vehicle upon compliance with prescribed rules and payment of charges, restraining scrapping during proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed impounded vehicle release of vehicle Delhi Maintenance and Management of Parking Places Rules, 2019 End of Life Vehicles

Deepak Kumar Chopra v. Union of India

22 May 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:4411

The Delhi High Court upheld the Government of India's discretion to empanel advocates without prescribed procedures, dismissing a petition challenging the empanelment notification for lack of cause and public interest.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant empanelment of advocates discretion of Government Article 226 judicial review

Connect Residuary Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner, Delhi Goods and Services Tax

22 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4349-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper service of show cause notice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court's decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A Central GST Act

Jagbir Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

22 May 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:4212
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The High Court discharged the accused from rape charges due to lack of prima facie evidence but upheld charges for physical assault and criminal intimidation, clarifying the test for framing charges under Sections 227 and 228 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge prima facie case Section 376 IPC rape charge

Devat and Ram Company Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1) Delhi & Ors.

22 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4208-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening of income tax assessment based solely on unsubstantiated allegations of bogus purchases, emphasizing the need for fair opportunity and proper evaluation of evidence under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A reopening of assessment

Ashok Thakur & Anr. v. Vijay Mittal

22 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4494

The High Court held that interlocutory orders not finally disposing of the suit are not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC and dismissed the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition interlocutory order final disposal

Nitish Gupta v. Shyama Gupta

22 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4405-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against a Family Court's interlocutory visitation order as non-maintainable under Section 19(2) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, directing the appellant to seek remedies before the Family Court.

family appeal_dismissed Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19(2) interlocutory order visitation rights

Pandey v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 49.1 & Ors.

22 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4377-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice issued for AY 2015-16 post 1 April 2021, holding it barred by limitation under TOLA and in light of the Revenue's Supreme Court concession.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Reassessment notice Limitation period Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment) Act 2020

Praveen Arya v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Yogdhyan Ahuja

22 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4239

The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order and chargesheet under Section 500 IPC and Section 66-A IT Act, holding that defamation being a non-cognizable offence requires a complaint by the aggrieved person and cannot be initiated by police on an FIR.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 500 IPC defamation non-cognizable offence Section 199 Cr.P.C

Raj Kumar Sharma v. State

22 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4237

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a complaint alleging false implication and illegal detention by police, holding that the complaint was premature and barred by Section 140 of the Delhi Police Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 200 Cr.P.C. Section 140 Delhi Police Act false implication

M/S MODFUL INTERIORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

22 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4350-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to non-communication of the show cause notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair opportunity to be heard, leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice natural justice GST notifications Section 168A GST Act

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central Ludhiana v. M/s. Garg Acrylics Ltd

22 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4120-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that additions on account of alleged bogus purchases and sales cannot be sustained without formal rejection of books under Section 145(3) and best judgment assessment under Section 144, as the net income was already declared, avoiding double taxation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 145(3) Section 144 bogus purchases and sales

Krishan Kumar & Ors. v. Delhi Jal Board & Ors.

22 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:4249-DB

The Delhi High Court directed coordinated efforts among agencies and utility providers to complete drainage works and ensure road construction does not exacerbate flooding in Mundka village.

administrative other flooding water logging drain construction utility service providers

Lalit Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

22 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Navin Chawla; C. Hari Shankar · 2025:DHC:4253-FB

The Delhi High Court upheld disqualification of candidates who failed to timely deposit election fees and declined to direct biometric verification for Bar Council elections outside the petition's scope.

administrative appeal_dismissed Bar Association elections Bar Council of Delhi biometric verification election fee deposit

Hands On Hands Ventures Private Limited v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others

22 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4340-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging GST show cause notice and order, permitting the petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit despite limitation, while leaving the validity of extension notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A CGST Act Show Cause Notice Validity of Notifications

Rajeev Bhardwaj v. Dipti Bhardwaj

22 May 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:4213

The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order directing the petitioner-husband to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.15,000 to the respondent-wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing his challenge to the quantum and basis of the award.

family appeal_dismissed Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance cruelty family court

Shruti Goenka v. Dhirendra Pandey & Anr.

22 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4309

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell immovable property is maintainable in Delhi if the cause of action partly arises there, despite the property being located in Uttar Pradesh.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Specific Performance Territorial Jurisdiction Agreement to Sell Section 16 CPC

State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Narender Singh

22 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4307

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused in a child sexual assault case due to material contradictions and lack of corroboration in the prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual assault Section 354 IPC POCSO Act child witness testimony

Shatrughan Prasad and Ors. v. Rupan Jain and Ors.

22 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4320

The court held that only persons claiming independent rights can resist execution of possession decrees, dismissing objections by tenants' employees lacking independent title.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 97 CPC execution proceedings independent possession judgment debtor

Nepal Siingh and Nitesh Shrivastav v. Rita Tiwari

22 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4321

The Delhi High Court reduced the cost imposed on defendants for belated filing of written statement under its supervisory jurisdiction to prevent undue hardship and ensure expeditious trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction costs in civil litigation written statement