Delhi High Court

33,441 judgments

Year:

M/s Shri Durga Automobiles v. Ram Dev

28 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4523-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking urgent hearing of a writ petition challenging an Industrial Award due to delay and laches in prosecution.

labor appeal_dismissed Industrial Award Writ Petition Preponement Delay and Laches

Bharat Construction and Tank Cleaner v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others

28 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4811-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders and notifications, directing the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies while leaving the validity of the notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Opportunity of Hearing

Lubna Rais v. Mohsin Khan

28 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4579-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court's order striking off the appellant's defence for single non-compliance, allowing her to file a written statement subject to costs and compliance with visitation directions.

family appeal_allowed Significant Family Court striking off defence non-compliance written statement

Delhi Police & Anr. v. Paramjeet

28 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4576-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a further medical examination before cancelling a candidate's police recruitment on grounds of partial hearing loss, emphasizing proper medical evaluation and specialist opinions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical fitness Delhi Police recruitment hearing loss judicial interference

Rajesh Ranjan v. Union of India

28 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4577-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that a non-contemnor has no locus to seek impleadment in contempt proceedings and limitation under Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act cannot be extended by Doctrine of Merger after dismissal of SLP in limine.

administrative petition_dismissed locus standi contempt petition Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 21 limitation

Vinay Jain v. ACIT Circle 43(1) Delhi & Anr.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4565-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 post 1 April 2021, following the Revenue’s Supreme Court concession that such notices fall outside the limitation period under TOLA.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment) Act, 2020

The Laymens Evangelical Fellowship v. Abhishek Buildcon Pvt Ltd

28 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4807

The High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's refusal to reject a suit at the preliminary stage, emphasizing that contractual interpretation and jurisdictional issues require full trial and appropriate proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 115 CPC Indemnity Bond Specific Performance

Manoj Kumar Panchal v. Mahender Kumar Panchal

28 May 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4537

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal in a cheque bounce case where the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by raising a probable defence supported by expert evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 presumption Cheque bounce Burden of proof

Pushpanjali Devi & Ors. v. Arjun Rai & Ors.

28 May 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:4535
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against a motor accident compensation award, holding that contributory negligence was not established and directing full compensation to be paid to the claimants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contributory negligence motor accident claim compensation deduction rash and negligent driving

Union of India v. M/S Rajiv Aggarwal (Engineers and Contractors)

28 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4684-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal challenging an arbitral award due to a 613-day delay in filing the appeal, holding that such delay is not condonable without sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 37 appeal condonation of delay limitation period

Vivek Malhotra v. Registrar Cooperative Societies, Delhi

28 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4761-DB

The Delhi High Court directed allotment and possession of a cooperative society flat to a member after dismissal of society's objections and payment of outstanding ground rent.

property petition_allowed Significant writ petition cooperative society flat allotment Registrar Cooperative Societies

IREO Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (OSD), New Delhi & Anr.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4564-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening notice for AY 2015-16 issued after 1 April 2021, following the Revenue's Supreme Court concession that such notices are barred by limitation under TOLA.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment) Act, 2020

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Charvak Trading Pvt. Ltd.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4528-DB

The High Court held that jurisdiction under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act cannot be assumed without incriminating material found during search, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and upholding deletion of additions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act incriminating material search and seizure jurisdiction

Kirti Kumar Dawar v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-30(5), Delhi & Ors.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4559-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2015-16 issued after 1 April 2021, holding it barred by limitation as per the Revenue's Supreme Court concession.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment) Act, 2020

ACCOLADE HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), DELHI

28 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4570-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued beyond the adjusted limitation period, considering statutory extensions and Supreme Court rulings, is invalid and set aside the proceedings.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148 Section 148A limitation period

Gain Capital Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) & Anr.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4569-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice issued for AY 2015-16 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following the Revenue's concession that such notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 are barred by limitation under TOLA.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment) Act, 2020

Parveen Kumar Malhotra v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 30(1), Delhi

28 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4568-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued beyond the extended limitation period under the Income Tax Act, 1961, even after excluding certain periods as per Supreme Court directions, is invalid and set aside the proceedings.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 149(1)

Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1), Delhi & Ors.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4566-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued beyond the extended limitation period under the Income Tax Act, 1961, considering statutory exclusions, is invalid and quashed the impugned notice and proceedings.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 149(1)

Sanjay Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 29(1), Delhi & Ors.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4567-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued beyond the prescribed limitation period under the Income Tax Act, 1961, after accounting for statutory extensions and judicial exclusions, is invalid and quashed the proceedings initiated thereunder.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 149(1)

Rajiv Kumar Khandelwal v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1) Delhi & Anr.

28 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4563-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening notice for AY 2015-16 issued after 1 April 2021, following the Revenue's Supreme Court concession that such notices fall outside the limitation period under TOLA.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment) Act, 2020