Delhi High Court
33,441 judgments
Vinay Jain v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused directors in a financial fraud case, holding that cooperation with investigation and bona fide conduct justify bail despite serious allegations.
Roshan Kumar Parida v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to treat it as a representation, pass a reasoned order within eight weeks, and allowed the petitioner an opportunity for oral representation.
Bhaskar Pandey and Ors v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of compromise between the parties and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.
Aman v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder and abduction case, holding that a co-accused's disclosure without independent corroboration cannot solely deny bail and emphasizing the need for balanced assessment of evidence and witness protection.
Suninder Sandha v. Jeevesh Sabharwal
The Delhi High Court upheld the partial production of documents under Section 91 CrPC in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, restricting summons to only relevant documents in possession of the party and dismissing fishing expedition claims.
Ankit Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused petitioner in a POCSO and IPC case due to lack of direct incriminating evidence against him in the prosecutrix’s statements.
Sofia Koti v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murdering her husband by strangulation, considering her prolonged custody, lack of flight risk, and trial delays.
Dinesh @ Sintu & Anr. v. Sunita & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's order rejecting the petitioners' application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and no deficiency in court fee was established.
Forum for Promotion of Quality Education for All v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 5th MVC’s Use Factor 2 for private unaided schools in property tax calculation and dismissed interim relief applications to stay its implementation pending final adjudication.
The State (NCT of Delhi) v. Akshay Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal, holding that material contradictions in prosecution evidence justified the benefit of doubt to the accused and no prima facie case for interference existed.
Ramandeep Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Ramandeep Singh in a large-scale heroin trafficking case, holding that the mandatory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies given the evidence linking him to a narcotic syndicate and recovery of intermediate quantity of heroin.
Raghavendra Bagal v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging RFP terms for consular services on grounds of lack of locus standi, holding that contractual clauses cannot be challenged by a petitioner not directly affected.
Lalit Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after confirming the peaceful and orderly conduct of Bar Association elections in Delhi, including the Shahdara Bar Association, in compliance with its directions.
Monty v. Subhash Kumar
The High Court condoned delay in filing a civil revision petition but allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise all issues before the trial court.
Sunmeet Singh v. Delhi Waqf Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Waqf Board to treat the petitioner’s reply as a representation and pass a detailed speaking order after hearing him regarding a notice issued under Section 54(1) of the Waqf Act, 1995.
Vinay Gupta v. Ajay Kumar Gupta and Ors
The High Court held that revision petitions under Section 115 CPC are barred against interlocutory orders of Commercial Courts by Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Article 227 jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly, dismissing the petition challenging the maintainability order.
Zana International v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to improper service of show cause notice via a less visible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Manoj Kumar Singh v. U O I & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioner's request, noting the counsel's unusual dissociation from the petition's contents.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Dr. Ravindra Narayan Das
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order quashing suspension beyond 270 days without charge-sheet under CCS Rules, directing reinstatement of the suspended government servant.
GNCTD v. Rajesh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an interim ex-parte order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, directing the petitioner to first seek relief before the Tribunal.