Delhi High Court

33,261 judgments

Year:

M/S Rohtas Trading Co. v. Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi North

30 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4833-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging CGST demand and penalties for fraudulent ITC, holding that statutory appeal under Section 107 is the appropriate remedy barring exceptional circumstances.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act Section 107 writ jurisdiction

M/S Jasmeet Trading Company v. Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi North

30 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4832-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order on fraudulent ITC, holding that statutory appeal under Section 107 is the appropriate remedy absent exceptional circumstances.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act Section 107 writ jurisdiction

M/S Lala Shivnath Rai Sumerchand Confectioner Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner, CGST Delhi-West, New Delhi

30 May 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:4853-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal with limited pre-deposit against GST demands involving alleged duplication of input tax credit recovery, directing adjudication by the Appellate Authority.

tax appeal_allowed Input Tax Credit GST CGST Act 2017 Section 74(1)

Discover India Ltd v. Vishwambhar Nath Dwivedi

30 May 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:4779

The Delhi High Court upheld the payment of gratuity based on the original consolidated salary, rejecting the employer’s claim of reduced salary during COVID-19 due to lack of employee consent and failure to contest the claim effectively.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 last drawn salary gratuity calculation salary reduction

Desh Raj v. Union of India

30 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:4850-DB

The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider the petitioner’s medical condition empathetically and pass a reasoned order on his transfer representation within four weeks.

administrative other transfer medical condition permanent disability government employee

Umesh Kumar Nagpal & Anr. v. Levi Strauss and Co.

30 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:4851-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal against an ad interim injunction by directing the Commercial Court to expeditiously hear the injunction application finally under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC with strict timelines and no adjournments.

civil other Procedural ad interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC commercial court final hearing

Hemant Sharawat & Ors. v. University of Delhi & Ors.

30 May 2025 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2025:DHC:4677

The Delhi High Court set aside the University of Delhi's decision to withhold appointment of selected candidates due to unproven allegations of unfair means, affirming that suspicion without concrete evidence cannot vitiate a recruitment process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review recruitment examination unfair means cancellation of examination

Jaspreet Singh v. Swaneet Kukreja

30 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4791-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory Family Court order listing applications for arguments, holding such appeals not maintainable and premature.

family appeal_dismissed Family Court interlocutory order appeal maintainability listing of applications

LRs of Late Sh. Ramesh Chand Sharma v. Late Sh. Mahesh Chand Sharma Through Lrs and Ors

30 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4752-DB

The Delhi High Court modified a sale order to require an inter se auction between parties before a Court Auction, ensuring compliance with an earlier decree directing the sequence of sale methods.

civil appeal_allowed Significant inter se auction court auction property sale court auctioneer

Prakash Chand & Anr. v. Jai Hind Public School Through Its Principal and Others

30 May 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 54

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of condonation of delay for filing statutory appeals by school teachers, holding that the over 1500-day delay was unjustified and the statutory limitation period must be strictly enforced.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation period Delhi School Education Act, 1973 statutory appeal

Suman v. Bharati College

30 May 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:4804
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a waitlisted candidate has no right to appointment after selected candidates have joined service, and vacancies arising thereafter must be filled by fresh selection.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant waitlist appointment termination eligibility criteria

Rohini Residential Scheme 1981 Association v. Delhi Development Authority

30 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4830

The Delhi High Court upheld DDA's revised premium rates under the Rohini Residential Scheme 1981, dismissing the petition challenging the demand letters as neither arbitrary nor violative of statutory provisions.

property petition_dismissed Significant Rohini Residential Scheme 1981 Delhi Development Authority pre-determined rates premium revision

Sudhir Sood & Anr. v. Delhi Cantonment Board & Ors.

30 May 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:4831

The Delhi High Court directed the Cantonment Board to follow due process and grant hearing before deciding on lease renewal, protecting petitioners from coercive action until final orders.

administrative petition_allowed lease renewal subsidiary survey number due process of law opportunity of hearing

Kum Kum Kohli v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 28-1

30 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4705-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice issued after 1 April 2021 for AY 2015-16, relying on the Supreme Court's concession that such notices are barred by limitation under the TOLA Act, 2020.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020

Chandra Prakash Srivastava v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1-1, Delhi

30 May 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4689-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2015-16 issued after April 1, 2021, following the Revenue's Supreme Court concession that such notices are barred by limitation under TOLA.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020

Kirpal Singh v. Mohammad Fahimuddin Khan & Anr.

30 May 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4808

The High Court dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC against an interlocutory order, reaffirming that only orders finally disposing of a suit are amenable to revision.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC Revision jurisdiction Interlocutory order Order I Rule 10 CPC

Tadi Tabi v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Refineries Division)

30 May 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:4800

The Delhi High Court upheld a PSU employee’s transfer order as a valid administrative decision under the Transfer Policy exception clause, dismissing claims of premature transfer, violation of joint posting policy, and mala fides.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant transfer policy administrative transfer judicial review mala fides

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Mishra v. Neeraj Kumari

30 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4741-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing re-medical examination for compassionate appointment, emphasizing limited interference with medical board findings except in exceptional cases.

administrative petition_dismissed Compassionate Appointment Medical Examination Concurrent Medical Board Findings Article 226

Staff Selection Commission and Ors. v. Dharm Veer

30 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:4727-DB

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for specialist review of medical reports before declaring a candidate medically unfit for employment, emphasizing the necessity of specialist opinion on diagnostic tests.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical fitness Detailed Medical Examination Review Medical Examination Pulmonologist opinion

The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD), Central -1 v. Late Shri Ladli Pershad Jaiswal through Legal Heir Shri Karamjit Jaiswal and Shri Jagjit Jaiswal

30 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4685-DB

The Delhi High Court admitted the Revenue's appeal challenging the limitation period for reassessment under amended Section 149 of the Income Tax Act and directed its hearing along with connected matters before a larger bench.

tax other Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Section 149