Delhi High Court

33,261 judgments

Year:

BHADRA INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT LTD & ORS v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS

30 May 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:4797

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging securitisation proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, holding that statutory remedies before the DRT and DRAT must be exhausted and the Court will not interfere with banks' commercial decisions on One Time Settlements.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act One Time Settlement Debt Recovery Tribunal Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Mohd Yusuf v. Kanwar Singh Saini

30 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4786
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court directed the Executing Court to dispose of the objection petition expeditiously, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court mandates against undue delays in execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant execution petition objection petition expeditious disposal execution court

Jyoti v. Dharampal Singh

30 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4785
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of a decree on admissions application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in a specific performance suit due to disputed execution and lack of clear admissions.

civil petition_dismissed Order XII Rule 6 CPC admissions specific performance Sale Deed

Satvinder Kaur v. M/S World FA Exports Pvt Ltd

30 May 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:4783

The High Court allowed the petition directing the Trial Court to permit cross-examination of PW-1 despite counsel's withdrawal and defendant's absence, emphasizing procedural fairness and limiting further adjournments.

civil appeal_allowed withdrawal of counsel cross-examination procedural fairness costs

Alka Srivastava v. Indian Council of Social Science Research & Ors.

30 May 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:4663-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that an ad hoc employee has no vested right to regularisation from initial appointment date absent eligibility and sanctioned post, and validated ICSSR's withdrawal of ACP/MACP benefits and pay refixation based on a High-Powered Committee's recommendations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant regularisation ad hoc appointment technical break Assured Career Progression Scheme

Rita Saxena v. GVL Satya Kumar

30 May 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:4777
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that contempt jurisdiction is limited to ensuring compliance with court orders and cannot assess the merits of decisions taken pursuant to those orders, dismissing the petitioner's contempt claim against a promotion denial following APAR upgradation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contempt jurisdiction compliance with court orders Departmental Promotion Committee Annual Performance Appraisal Report

M/S REVANTA MULTISTATE CGHS LTD v. SUNNY SAPEN

30 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4688-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a cooperative housing society acting as a real estate developer is a 'promoter' under RERA and liable to refund amounts collected from buyers, dismissing the appeal challenging RERA Authority's jurisdiction.

real_estate appeal_dismissed Significant Real Estate Regulatory Authority promoter definition RERA Act Multi-State Cooperative Society

Arun Kumar v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

30 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:4693

The High Court quashed non-bailable warrants issued against the accused for non-appearance of counsel held up elsewhere, emphasizing that adjournments are discretionary and ordering costs to be paid to an elderly witness.

criminal appeal_allowed non-bailable warrants adjournment counsel absence Section 279 IPC

Arun Das v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

30 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:4666
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the 2015 Policy’s eligibility criteria, dismissing petitions of minors as on cut-off date and those with jhuggis solely used for commercial purposes, affirming DDA’s authority to proceed with eviction and rehabilitation accordingly.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Slum & Jhuggi Jhopri Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 cut-off date minority eligibility commercial use of jhuggi

Sanoj Kumar Mishra v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

30 May 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:2121

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a sexual offence case after the complainant recanted her allegations and admitted to lodging a false complaint under influence of rivals.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail false complaint sexual offences recantation

Hemant Kumar v. Food Corporation of India

30 May 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:4665
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an employee undergoing urgent liver transplant surgery at a non-empaneled hospital with delayed ex post facto approval is entitled to reimbursement at actual hospital charges beyond prescribed ceiling rates.

administrative petition_allowed Significant medical reimbursement liver transplant emergency treatment non-empaneled hospital

Pooja Lodhi v. Union of India & Ors.

30 May 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:4664

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate’s application for TGT (English) post on grounds that her degree did not meet the essential qualification of studying English for all three years, deferring to the recruiting authority’s expert assessment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Essential Qualification B.El.Ed degree TGT English recruitment Academic equivalence

Ravi Ranjan Singh v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

30 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:4642

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking protection of a refugee camp in the Yamuna floodplains, holding no legal right to alternate accommodation exists and upholding ecological restoration mandates.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 Pakistani Hindu refugees Majnu Ka Tila Yamuna floodplains

Sh. KamtU Anuragi & Anr. v. Union of India

30 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:4609
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a railway ticket is valid for 24 hours from issuance, entitling the deceased to bonafide passenger status and statutory compensation for death due to an accidental fall from the train.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act 1989 bonafide passenger statutory compensation untoward incident

U.K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-8 & Ors.

30 May 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:4683-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the extended sixteen-year limitation period for reopening income tax assessments related to foreign assets introduced by the Finance Act, 2012, does not apply retrospectively to revive assessments barred by limitation prior to the amendment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 notice Section 149 limitation Section 147 reassessment

B. G. Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd v. Army Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr.

30 May 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:4710
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting a construction contractor’s labour price escalation claim, holding that the applicable wage index is the publicly known rate prior to tender submission and that the No Claim Certificate did not estop the claim due to economic duress.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 escalation clause minimum wages

Samuel Kamalesan v. Union of India

30 May 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:4652-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an Army officer for refusing to fully participate in regimental religious parades, holding that military discipline under Article 33 permits reasonable restrictions on religious freedom in the Armed Forces.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Army Act 1950 Rule 14 Army Rules 1954 Article 33 Constitution Article 25 Constitution

Keshav Chand & Ors. v. M/S Ashoka Gears/ M/S Ashoka Machines Tools Corpn & Anr

30 May 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:4778
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award for denial of fair hearing to workmen and remanded the matter for fresh hearing ensuring proper representation and adherence to natural justice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant natural justice audi alteram partem labor dispute Industrial Disputes Act

Harjeet Singh & Anr. v. Ansal Plaza Owners Welfare Association & Ors.

30 May 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:4667
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to stay proceedings and permitted the newly elected Executive Committee of APOWA to manage the association pending final adjudication, clarifying the maintainability of suits by societies and appealability of orders under Section 151 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Societies Registration Act, 1860 Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC Section 151 CPC

Adesh Gupta v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

30 May 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:4742

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging orders under Section 145 Cr.P.C., holding that demarcation and possession of farmhouses by legal owners was lawful and no breach of peace or forcible dispossession justified interference.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 145 CrPC demarcation possession breach of peace