Delhi High Court
33,081 judgments
Habiob Bedru Omer v. Customs
The Delhi High Court allowed bail to a narcotics accused due to illegal detention without Magistrate production violating NDPS Act procedures and constitutional rights.
D v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for penetrative sexual assault on a minor under the POCSO Act and IPC, affirming the reliability of the survivor's testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence and statutory presumptions.
Karan Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a POCSO case due to failure of prosecution to prove the survivor's minority beyond reasonable doubt as mandated under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act.
INDIAMART INTERMESH LTD. v. PUMA SE
The Delhi High Court held that use of a registered trademark as a selectable option in an e-commerce platform’s drop-down menu constitutes trademark use and infringement, denying safe harbor protection to the intermediary failing due diligence.
M/s Mahavir Prasad Gupta and Sons v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on the ground that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed in violation of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, holding such awards null and void and emphasizing that waiver of such objection requires express written agreement.
Ajay Yadav v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to Ajay Yadav in a PMLA money laundering case, holding that prolonged trial delays and constitutional liberty under Article 21 override the stringent bail conditions under Section 45 of PMLA.
Sadhana Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a candidate seeking entry after gate closing time and rescheduling of CUET exam, holding that strict adherence to examination timings and procedures is mandatory to maintain fairness and discipline.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. M/s K.R. Pulp and Papers Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the invalidity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 due to lack of specific, tangible reasons and failure to apply independent mind, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Prashant Pareek v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 509 IPC based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between the parties, applying Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Supreme Court precedent.
Sh. Momin & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine, voluntary settlement between the parties, exercising its jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Mayank Shridhar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Ravi Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Hari Kishan v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust and an abuse of process.
Vishal Vashisht alias Vishal Sharma & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the basis of a bona fide settlement and mutual divorce, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings after amicable compromise amounts to abuse of process.
Mukesh Kher and Others v. The State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Solomon Ogbe v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused under the NDPS Act due to prolonged pre-trial detention violating the right to speedy trial, overriding statutory bail prohibition.
Manish Kumar v. Amit Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 138 NI Act after the parties amicably settled the cheque dishonor dispute and the petitioner paid the compensation amount.
Sh. Dinesh Kumar and Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the Court's power to end futile matrimonial criminal proceedings.
Sh. Varun Kumar and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, emphasizing the futility of continuing proceedings.
Prashant Chaudhary & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following a valid mutual settlement and divorce by consent, emphasizing the Court's power to quash proceedings to promote peace between parties.