Delhi High Court
31,892 judgments
Sagir v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Sentence Review Board's unreasoned rejection of a life convict's premature release plea and directed reconsideration applying relevant legal criteria.
Neeraj Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC on the ground of compromise and marriage between the parties, holding that continuing prosecution was not in the interest of justice.
Manoj Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Interim bail on medical grounds was denied to an accused involved in serious NDPS offences as his medical condition was stable and adequately treated in jail, and his regular bail had been dismissed.
M/S TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD v. M/S PREM POWER CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.
MS VEERJI RESTAURANT PRIVATE LIMITED v. YASH RAI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff restraining defendants from infringing its trademark and copyright, awarding damages and costs due to defendants' non-appearance and mala fide use of similar marks.
Virtuous Energy Private Limited v. Smart Power Grid Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that complex questions of binding non-signatories to arbitration agreements must be decided by the arbitral tribunal, not the referral court.
M/S Arjan Dass and Sons Private Limited v. Tinna Rubber and Infra Limited
The High Court allowed belated filing of an amended written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC with costs, emphasizing discretion to condone delay in the interest of justice while discouraging negligence.
Soni Dave v. M/S Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt Ltd
The High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the respondent's pending application to prevent delay in recording the petitioner's evidence, emphasizing party cooperation.
Vakil Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in delivery of commercial quantity ganja, holding that strict conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and procedural delays did not warrant bail.
Aditya Dave and Ors. v. M/S Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to decide the application under Order VI Rule 16 CPC and the injunction application together within eight weeks to ensure expeditious disposal.
Shri Ramesh Kumar v. Shri Mohit Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed, clarified that interim observations are tentative and directed the Trial Court to expedite the suit's final disposal.
Dr Aastha Raj v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences
Delhi High Court quashed NBEMS order cancelling candidature and debarment for unfair means due to lack of evidence and violation of natural justice, directing declaration of results.
M/S Derive N Fill v. Germani Prasad
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award reinstating the workman with 50% back wages, holding that the employer failed to prove misconduct or voluntary resignation despite ample opportunity to lead evidence.
Gulshan Chawla v. Neetu Gera & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte order, holding that interference is not warranted when the matter is reserved for judgment.
Kamal Kumar Gautam v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing that continuing criminal proceedings would be futile and not conducive to peace.
Rahul Sharma v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the married parties, emphasizing the futility of continuing criminal proceedings after voluntary resolution.
Deepak Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 337 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, applying Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and relevant Supreme Court precedents.
Sumit Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, exercising its power under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.
Eashan Pandya v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a motor accident FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC following a voluntary settlement and compounding of related offences, emphasizing the court's power under Section 528 BNSS to promote peace and avoid futile litigation.
Mayank Sondhi & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial offences FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable mediation settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.