Delhi High Court
31,373 judgments
Kunaj Raj v. Rahul Kumar Meena
The Delhi High Court held that a probationer is not deemed confirmed without a formal confirmation order and set aside the Tribunal's order of deemed confirmation, remanding the matter for further consideration.
SSC and Anr. v. Rajesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference in medical fitness decisions for disciplined forces recruitment is limited and set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, upholding the Review Medical Board's finding of unfitness.
PUMA SE v. HIMANSHU SHARMA
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of PUMA SE against a defendant selling counterfeit goods, holding that deliberate infringement of well-known trademarks warrants injunction, damages, and costs.
National Highways Authority of India v. M.G. Contractors P. Ltd- Arvind Techno Engineers P. Ltd. (JV)
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting compensation for delay in handing over site and overhead losses, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting the Petitioner's challenge based on waiver and patent illegality.
Srikanta Sutar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to reconsider a transfer order issued without allowing the petitioner to submit posting preferences due to a technical glitch, emphasizing adherence to transfer policy and natural justice.
Airports Authority Employees Union v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a petition challenging a 2020 communication allowing informal discussions with unions polling over 30% votes, upholding the validity of a 2018 majority union recognition for a fixed term.
Snerea Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -18
The Delhi High Court held that transfer of shares of a company holding immovable property does not amount to transfer of the property itself, and additions under Section 68 cannot be made against the company on that basis without actual transfer of property.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex NB Sub Khem Bahadur Thapa
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities detected during service are service-related unless the employer proves otherwise, and limited its interference to legal errors only.
Navneet v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging mandatory Physics qualification in TGT (Mathematics) recruitment, holding employer's prescribed essential qualifications are binding and not subject to judicial interference absent ambiguity or contravention of recruitment rules.
Priya Chauhan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to recruitment rules of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition for lack of jurisdiction.
M/S. BVG INDIA LTD. v. NAGAR NIGAM JAIPUR GREATER & ANR
In absence of a designated seat of arbitration, the court at the place where arbitration proceedings are conducted has exclusive jurisdiction, and a general exclusive jurisdiction clause does not override this principle.
Prism Johnson Ltd v. Doosan Power Systems India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that parties may agree on a distinct procedure for appointment of arbitrators differing from institutional rules, and court may appoint an arbitrator if a party fails to act under that agreed procedure, allowing the petition for appointment of respondent's arbitrator.
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd v. Mirador Commercial Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the Sole Arbitrator’s appointment under Clause 39.2 of the contract, dismissing the Petitioner’s challenge that it was a unilateral appointment violating party autonomy and arbitration law.
Ravi Patwardhan v. N.K. Jambholkar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the quashing of appointments as academic since the petitioners had already served their tenure under interim orders and were entitled to retiral benefits.
India Steel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Pavan Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks, emphasizing the obligation to avoid undue delay without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Trehan International Consultants and Engineers Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order due to improper service of notice via an inaccessible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with proper hearing, while leaving the validity of the impugned notification open pending Supreme Court review.
CMR Green Technologies Limited v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that refund amounts cannot be re-credited to import licenses under an abolished scheme and must be paid directly, while upholding dismissal of belated appeals on limitation grounds.
Ranjeet Singh & Ors. v. Neeru Mehta (Deceased) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's imposition of Rs. 30,000 cost for belated filing of written statement, refusing to interfere under Article 227 absent perversity or illegality.
Mohd Ashraf and Ors v. Abdul Wahid Siddique
The court directed expeditious disposal of the pending appeal and allowed the trial court to consider directions under Section 151 CPC for deposit of user charges, while upholding the binding nature of consent given before the appellate court not to press execution.