Pavan Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 09 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:5446-DB

C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul

W.P.(C) 9445/2025

2025:DHC:5446-DB

administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks, emphasizing the obligation to avoid undue delay without expressing any opinion on the merits.

Full Text

W.P.(C) 9445/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 9445/2025 & CM APPL. 39907/2025
PAVAN KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vaibhav Thaledi, Mr. Harsimran Singh and Mr. Hitendra Singh, Advs.

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Neeraj, Sr. PC

WITH

Mr. Vedansh Anand, GP

WITH

Mr. Sahaj Garg and Mr. Soumyadip Chakraborty, Advs. for
UOI

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
09.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

JUDGMENT

1. The only prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner to the Director General of Border Security Force on 26 August 2024.

2. We do not see why the representation is remaining pending for almost a year as on date without any decision.

3. Rule, returnable forthwith.

4. In the circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take a decision on the petitioner’s W.P.(C) 9445/2025 representation positively within a period of four weeks and communicate to the petitioner as soon as it is taken.

5. We had not expressed any opinion on any merit of the claim of the petitioner. The petition is disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

AJAY DIGPAUL, J. JULY 9, 2025

Pavan Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

AI Summary

Full Text

JUDGMENT

Contact Us for a Free Consultation