Delhi High Court
31,373 judgments
Utkarsh Arora v. Additional Commissioner CGST, Delhi North Ward
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order for fraudulent ITC, holding that writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily available in such cases and permitting the petitioner to file a belated appeal.
Paul Onyeji Atuh v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a large-scale organized cyber fraud case, holding that the gravity of offences and risk of absconding preclude bail.
Deepak Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner’s transfer order by treating the writ petition as a representation and passing a reasoned order, staying the transfer’s implementation pending decision.
Naresh Kumar v. Om Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging the dismissal of an interim application.
Sanjay Bansal v. Income Tax Officer
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued beyond the prescribed limitation period is invalid, and time spent in challenging earlier notices cannot extend the limitation period.
Babita Kumari v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Bail was denied to the accused in a serious sexual assault case under IPC and POCSO Act due to gravity of offences and risk of tampering with evidence despite her claims of innocence and cooperation.
Rohit Chaturvedi v. Rachna Chaturvedi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside an ex parte decree, holding that unsubstantiated claims of non-service and unauthorized representation do not justify setting aside the decree under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Abhishek and Anr. v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compassionate appointment, holding that in absence of a general policy and with a valid classification limited to Covid-19 deaths, no entitlement arises under Article 14.
PFIZER LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, DELHI & ORS
The High Court held that the Referral Authority must apply its mind and frame terms of reference reflecting the real dispute before referring to the Labour Court, setting aside a mechanically issued referral order.
Divay Bhasin v. Sharad Kumar Sachan
The High Court set aside the dismissal of a civil suit for non-appearance due to international travel, granting a final opportunity to the petitioner to lead evidence subject to payment of costs.
M/S TRIGO IMAGEMENT SLOVAKIA v. MADHUSUDAN AUTO LIMITED
The Delhi High Court transferred a preliminary-stage winding up petition to the National Company Law Tribunal in line with the Supreme Court's directive and statutory provisions governing corporate insolvency proceedings.
Dolby International AB & Anr. v. Lava International Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an implementer who delays FRAND negotiations and acts as an unwilling licensee must make pro tem security deposits for use of Standard Essential Patents, balancing equities without detailed merits examination.
Rajmeet Singh LR v. Harleen Kaur & Anr.
The court allowed the legal representative of a deceased plaintiff to summon three official witnesses after closure of evidence, granting one final opportunity to substantiate the suit for cancellation of sale deed.
Sunil@Maya v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder and attempt to murder after prolonged pre-trial detention exceeding ten years, considering his limited role and trial delays.
Sanjeev Chanana v. J. S. Vohra
The Delhi High Court recalled non-bailable warrants against a company director in execution proceedings on condition of his compliance with court directions.
DELHI KANNADA EDUCATION SOCIETY v. SHISHUPAL
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's order striking off the defendant Society's defense for failure to comply with a mediation settlement and non-filing of the written statement despite repeated opportunities.
Mr. Rahul Kumar; Ms. Nimisha Gupta; Ms. Indira Murthy; Mr. Pranshu Prakash v. Saurabh Goel
The High Court held that attachment warrants cannot be issued without first deciding an objection petition filed under Order XLVII CPC in execution proceedings.
Jitender Singh Alias Babbu and Ors. v. The State (NCT) of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a cheating FIR and all proceedings against accused based on an amicable settlement under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, following Supreme Court precedent.
Divanshu Sharma v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the court's power to end criminal proceedings on compromise under Section 528 BNSS 2023.
Prakash Chand & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent of the parties in a matrimonial dispute.