Delhi High Court

31,373 judgments

Year:

Maninder Singh Madaan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

10 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:5451

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under theft-related IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principle that criminal proceedings can be ended to serve the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita mediation

Paramjit Singh and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

10 Jul 2025 · Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:5444

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its power under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS 2023 Sections 498A IPC mutual consent divorce

Khushi Ram Gurung v. The State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

10 Jul 2025 · Shalinder Kaur, J · 2025:DHC:5459

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a Nepalese national apprehended with commercial quantity of charas, holding that the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies and the petitioner failed to satisfy the conditions for bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS commercial quantity bail

Yash Chadha v. Commissioner of Customs

10 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5612-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that used personal jewellery worn by a passenger is exempt from customs duty and detention, and set aside the illegal detention of the petitioner's gold chain due to non-issuance of a Show Cause Notice within the statutory period.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Show Cause Notice Baggage Rules 2016 personal effects

Bina Arora v. Sunil Kumar Arora and Ors.

10 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6164

The High Court held that suits for partition are not barred by limitation as no specific period is prescribed, and limitation cannot be decided at the pre-trial stage without evidence.

civil petition_dismissed Significant partition suit limitation Order VII Rule 11 CPC running cause of action

Rahul Sharma v. Harish Arora

10 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1216
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the suit valuation and reliance on an unregistered lease deed were proper at this stage.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action unregistered lease deed Registration Act 1908

Sonia v. Union of India

09 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5282-DB

The High Court transferred a writ petition seeking compassionate appointment of civilians in defence services to the Central Administrative Tribunal, holding that the Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

administrative other compassionate appointment Central Administrative Tribunal Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 19

Tapan Kumar Ghosh v. Anima Deb & Ors.

09 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6671

The High Court held that where a statutory appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act exists, a revision petition under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable and refused to suo moto convert the revision into an appeal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 115 CPC Section 299 Indian Succession Act Revision petition maintainability

Hemant Kumar v. The Project Director and Ors.

09 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3234

The Delhi High Court upheld that termination of temporary contract workers due to non-renewal does not amount to retrenchment or confer rights to regular employment under labour laws.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant contractual employment non-renewal of contract retrenchment Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Euro Global Bharat Pvt. Ltd v. Sharmila Yadav

09 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6104

The Delhi High Court held that a dispute involving immovable property used for both residential and commercial purposes does not qualify as a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, and thus the civil court retains jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant commercial dispute Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VII Rule 11 CPC jurisdiction

Harish v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:5959

The Delhi High Court held that a person released on technical grounds due to procedural lapses can be lawfully re-arrested if proper procedure is subsequently followed, dismissing the petition challenging the re-arrest and remand.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant re-arrest Case Diary grounds of arrest procedural safeguards

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Prabodh Kumar Tiwari

09 Jul 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:5816

The High Court held that prosecution under Section 276CC for wilful failure to file returns pursuant to a Section 153A notice is independent of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(b), and acquittal is justified where wilful default is not established.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 276CC Income Tax Act wilful failure to file returns Section 153A notice penalty under Section 271(1)(b)

TPG Software Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 25(2) New Delhi

09 Jul 2025 · Vibhu Bakhrhu; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5718-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the ITAT order on transfer pricing comparables for AY 2014-15 due to lack of reasoned discussion and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant transfer pricing comparables FAR analysis Transactional Net Margin Method

Meenakshi Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward- 35(6), New Delhi

09 Jul 2025 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:5415-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the addition of ₹25 lakhs as unexplained credit, holding that failure to establish the genuineness of a loan from a paper company justifies reopening and addition under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 reopening unexplained credit accommodation entries

Kunwar Chandresh; Poonam Prasad; Divyansh Singh; Munis Nasir; Kanishka Shivhare; Anand Murthi Rao v. Airport Authority of India

09 Jul 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:5706
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and stayed a debarment order during arbitration, holding that interim relief is warranted to prevent irreparable harm despite the arbitral tribunal's earlier refusal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim relief Debarment order Blacklisting

Nitin Jain v. Sneh Lata Goel

09 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5645-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s order granting interim maintenance to the wife and minor child under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that a decree for restitution of conjugal rights does not bar maintenance claims.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act restitution of conjugal rights maintenance from date of application

GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. v. MOHD JAVED THROUGH SHEHNAZ AND ORS

09 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:5688
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for future medical expenses and attendant charges in a motor accident claim while allowing the appellant to withdraw the appeal challenging recovery rights post statutory amendment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173 Section 166(3) Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

SSC and Anr. v. Sandeep

09 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5410-DB

The High Court held that courts have limited scope to interfere with medical board findings supported by clinical evidence and set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination for a candidate declared unfit due to Knock Knee.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical examination knock knee intermalleolar distance judicial interference

National Institute of Plant Genome Research v. Vipin Kumar & Ors.

09 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:5636

The Delhi High Court upheld the Authority's award of compensation equal to the wage differential under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, dismissing challenges by the principal employer and contractor.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 20(3) wage differential compensation

Union of India & Ors. v. Anjani Bana

09 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5569-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a fresh medical examination including an orthopedic specialist to reassess a candidate's fitness after conflicting medical reports and absence of specialist opinion in earlier examinations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical fitness orthopedic specialist carrying angle cubitus valgus