Delhi High Court
31,373 judgments
Davinder Singh v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of eviction notice upon expiry of a thirty-year lease, directing due process for eviction and mandating consideration of petitioner's representation for fresh lease independently of eviction proceedings.
Brij Bhushan Airy v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court held that a lease limited to thirty years cannot be extended unilaterally beyond its term, but directed the lessor to consider the lessee’s renewal representation before eviction following due legal process.
Rahul Verma v. Delhi Cantonment Board
The Delhi High Court held that a lease limited to thirty years cannot be extended without mutual consent, directed the respondent to consider the petitioner’s renewal request, and mandated eviction only after due legal process post lease expiry.
Shagufta Feroz and Anr v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of petitioners' property upon their undertaking to use it lawfully and compliance with procedural requirements, affirming the necessity of Show Cause Notices before sealing.
Anand Yadav & Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to consider the petitioners' application for de-sealing their shop used for permissible activities, subject to undertaking and assessment of misuse charges.
Suniti Madan v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court remanded the NDMC demand for outstanding dues for reconciliation and directed clear communication and hearing before finalizing charges for condonable breaches in a leased commercial property.
Manju Devi v. M/S Cholamandalam General Insurance Company Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that family pension and similar benefits cannot be deducted from statutory compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, allowing the appellant's challenge to such deduction in a motor accident claim.
Prakash Chand v. Bahadur Singh
The High Court dismissed the petition for default and nonprosecution due to the petitioner's repeated nonappearance and failure to comply with court orders including payment of costs.
Akhil Kumar Alias Dev and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Sachin Rajput v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings against the petitioner following a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Amit Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Daman Preet Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties, emphasizing the promotion of peace and avoidance of futile litigation.
Manjeet Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a motor accident FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation paid to the victims, relying on its power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Neera Misra v. Rakesh Chandra Misra
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to include the Trust as plaintiff and a declaratory relief of ownership, dismissed the defendant's rejection application, and held the suit maintainable on the basis of possession and pleadings.
Vidya Rai v. National Testing Agency & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to examination answer keys must be made within the prescribed window and refused to entertain belated objections raised for the first time in a writ petition, dismissing the petition.
Vinod Rai @ Bhullan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal by acquitting the appellant of certain offences but upheld his conviction for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor, reducing his sentence to 20 years rigorous imprisonment.
Agya Singh v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that used gold jewellery worn by a passenger is exempt as personal effects under the Baggage Rules and set aside unlawful detention by Customs for failure to issue Show Cause Notice within the statutory period.
CDR Yogesh Mahla v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's challenge to a show cause notice issued for sexual harassment, holding that no appeal lies to the Armed Forces Tribunal against ICC recommendations absent service rules, and that premature judicial interference at the show cause notice stage is unwarranted.
Anish Muralidhar v. Susanta Kar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the employer's burden to disprove service connection under the Military Pension Rules.
Mrityunjay v. Rajesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, holding that the employer must prove non-attribution to service and that the court's certiorari jurisdiction is limited.