Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Satender Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed convictions under Section 489C IPC for fake currency possession but modified sentences to the period already served, applying Supreme Court guidelines on release after substantial custody.
XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. WWW.XIAOMI-INDIA.XYZ & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that Domain Name Registrars must verify registrant identities and cooperate with trademark owners and law enforcement to prevent fraudulent use of domain names infringing registered trademarks, issuing comprehensive directions to multiple stakeholders to curb cyber fraud and protect intellectual property rights.
Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. v. Kumar Prahlad & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must exercise due diligence to prevent trademark infringement via fraudulent domain registrations and directed systemic reforms involving banks, law enforcement, and regulators to combat cyber fraud.
HT MEDIA LTD v. POOJA SHARMA & ORS.
Delhi High Court directs comprehensive multi-stakeholder measures including Domain Name Registrars, banks, and law enforcement to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names.
Emitec Gesellschaft Fur Emissionstechnologie MBH v. Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trademarks
The Delhi High Court set aside the patent refusal order for lack of inventive step due to procedural defects and remanded the matter for fresh consideration applying the established five-step test.
Dhruv Narayan Singh v. Arif Masood
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Respondent's application to reject the election petition at the threshold, holding that the petition discloses a cause of action and the disputed bank letters are prima facie genuine, requiring trial on merits.
TATA SKY LIMITED v. S G ENTERPREISES – TATA SKY SALES AND SERVICES AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that domain registrars and banks must implement robust verification and cooperation mechanisms to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud via fraudulent domain names, granting interim injunctions and issuing systemic directions to stakeholders.
Resham Priyadarshini v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against the refusal of a patent application, holding that the claims were sufficiently clear when read with dependent claims and specification, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of inventive step.
THE CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES, INC v. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that domain name registrars must exercise due diligence and cooperate with law enforcement to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud through fraudulent domain registrations, directing systemic reforms and injunctions against infringing parties.
Pradeep Batra v. Kuldip Singh Verma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to sell due to the Plaintiff's failure to prima facie prove continuous readiness and willingness, particularly financial capacity, to perform the contract.
Meta Platforms Inc v. Noufel Malol & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that substantial compliance with a permanent injunction and delayed payment of damages satisfies the decree, rejecting additional costs and restitutionary claims due to the decree holder's own delay in enforcement.
Dipak Prasad v. Sangita Kumari
The Delhi High Court enhanced interim maintenance from ₹21,000 to ₹23,000 per month based on the petitioner/husband’s net income after statutory deductions, rejecting claims of parental dependency and applying the 'Family Resource Cake' principle.
Sh Rakesh and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of court process.
Abdul Abbas @ Abbas Bilal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a stalking-related FIR under Section 354D IPC on compromise grounds, emphasizing the inherent power to quash non-compoundable offences where the complainant no longer wishes to proceed.
Ganesh Dhar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Vinod Kumar Jha v. CBI; Vijender Rana v. Central Bureau of Investigation; Abhishek Verma v. CBI
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order framing charges under the Official Secrets Act, ruling that investigation and filing of police report by CBI is permissible and Section 210 CrPC applies to club complaint and chargesheet proceedings to avoid parallel trials.
Rakesh Kumar Gulati v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the cognizance order under PMLA, holding that absence of pre-cognizance hearing does not vitiate the order without demonstrated prejudice and that delay in raising such objection disentitles relief.
Moin Akhtar Qureshi v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing the accused to provide voice samples for investigation, ruling that such direction does not violate constitutional protections against self-incrimination and is permissible under judicial interpretation and procedural safeguards.
J. Vasanthan v. State
Anticipatory bail was denied to an advocate accused of fraudulent enrolment using forged degree certificates, emphasizing the need to protect the integrity of the legal profession and justice system.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. M/S TCK Advisers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging the exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing assessment, upholding the DRP and ITAT's factual findings on functional dissimilarity and application of export turnover filter.