Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Abhishek Aggarwal v. Indrawati and Ors

23 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6083

The High Court held that an interim order dismissing an application to recall witnesses is not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC, and dismissed the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interim order Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC

Raj Kumar v. State

23 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6105

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for armed robbery under Sections 392/397 IPC but reduced the fine and default sentence considering the appellant's conduct and time served.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC judicial TIP

Paras Parjapat v. State NCT of Delhi

23 Jul 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:6102

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC but modified the sentence by enhancing the fine and ordering release on the period already undergone.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Conviction Sentence modification

R K Tiwari @ R K Tripathi v. Naveen Capoor

23 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6106

The Delhi High Court held that an interim order denying further cross-examination is not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC as it does not finally dispose of the suit or proceeding.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interim order cross-examination

Ashutosh Kumar v. Amrendra Kumar

23 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6107

The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging an amendment order.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC Revision jurisdiction Interlocutory order Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Jai Bhagwan Sangwan v. UOI & Anr

22 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:5996-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal from service of a CISF officer for unauthorized absence, holding that interim relief on posting does not override a valid reversion and that courts will not interfere with disciplinary punishment unless shockingly disproportionate.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized absence disciplinary proceedings removal from service paramilitary force discipline

Vinod Rajoria v. Mohinder Kumar Verma

22 Jul 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:6027

The Delhi High Court held that the buyer was entitled to refund of advance with interest due to seller's failure to deliver vacant possession and cloud on title, and restrained the seller from alienating the property until refund.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell refund of advance vacant possession

Savita v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6072-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging a dismissal order passed during the pendency of the original petition.

constitutional petition_allowed Procedural writ petition withdrawal of petition liberty to file fresh petition dismissal order

Anokhe Lal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5981-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that a commission-based deliveryman was not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act and upheld the Labour Court's Award dismissing his termination claim.

labor appeal_dismissed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 workman definition self-employed commission basis

Mohammad Inamul Haq v. University of Delhi & Ors.

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5983-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the appointment of a candidate under OBC reservation, holding that a valid state-issued OBC certificate is conclusive unless challenged.

administrative appeal_dismissed OBC certificate Central List of OBC University recruitment Reservation benefits

Staff Selection Commission and Ors. v. Mahendra

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5871-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Staff Selection Commission's delayed writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order for a fresh medical examination and appointment, emphasizing the importance of urgency and rejecting the petition on grounds of delay and laches.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal fresh medical examination delay and laches service appointment

Union of India v. Indian Railway Pharmacist Association

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5878-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order holding that placement in Grade Pay Rs. 4200/- after two years is a non-functional placement and not a promotion for MACP benefits under the ACP scheme.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression MACP Pharmacist cadre Grade Pay

Jai Bhagwan Gupta v. The Controller General of Accounts

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5984-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an employee who retired before the amendment dispensing with promotional examination requirements is not entitled to financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme.

service_law petition_dismissed Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation promotional examination Recruitment Rules amendment

Jafor Ali Mollah v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:5902-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated Review Petition and upheld the grant of pro rata pension arrears from the date of discharge, rejecting limitation and administrative circular arguments.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pro rata pension arrears limitation review petition

Union of India v. Sanjeet Sehrawat

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5869-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a candidate despite a pending criminal case, holding that mere pendency of trial does not disqualify from appointment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant appointment pending criminal case moral turpitude Central Administrative Tribunal

AAYAAM CAREER ACADEMY v. AAYAM CAREER INSTITUTE PVT. LTD.

22 Jul 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:6024-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal by enforcing a lawful settlement agreement reached through court-facilitated mediation, leaving no issue for adjudication.

commercial appeal_allowed settlement agreement mediation conciliation commercial dispute

Management of M/s Acfoli Inc v. Surender Narayan Singh

22 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6109

The High Court set aside a Labour Court award of compensation for illegal closure due to lack of evidence on applicability of Chapter V-B of the Industrial Disputes Act and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Chapter V-B closure of establishment prior permission

Utility Forms Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

22 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:5921-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without proper notice on the GST portal, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court review.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST portal Additional Notices Tab Section 168A Central GST Act

Aniruddha Kar v. Union of India & Ors.

22 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:5944-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging pension policy conditions of an ex-serviceman, holding that the Armed Forces Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate such service matters involving constitutional questions.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Armed Forces Tribunal jurisdiction service pension writ petition

Raj Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

22 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:5928-DB

The Court upheld the employer’s right to recover amounts paid under a set aside Industrial Award but restrained recovery of interest from a retired Group-C employee, distinguishing voluntary overpayment cases.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 recovery of overpayment interest on recovery Group-C employee