Delhi High Court
31,024 judgments
Rajesh Patel v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the bail application without deciding on merits and directed the Sessions Court to expedite trial proceedings for early disposal.
Union of India & Ors. v. IC 43586P Col Sanjay Singh (Retd)
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension, holding that the employer must positively prove non-attribution of disabilities to military service when the disability was absent at entry.
Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to approach the Armed Forces Tribunal, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
F- HOFFMANN -LA ROCHE AG & ANR. v. ZYDUS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 104A of the Patents Act, the plaintiff must prove the defendant’s product is identical to the patented product before compelling disclosure of the defendant’s manufacturing process, and mere similarity of biologics does not satisfy this requirement.
Saroj Bala v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking allotment of flats under the Punjab Migrants Rehabilitation Scheme, holding that administrative decisions based on adverse fraud investigations cannot be interfered with absent patent illegality.
Pawan Kumar v. Prakarti Rawat
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of the petitioner's right to lead evidence in a motor accident claim, holding that the petitioner failed to avail a final opportunity granted to summon witnesses.
Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing equal relaxation in recruitment tests for respondents, ruling that arbitrary denial of such relaxation without reasons is unsustainable.
Hiran v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for kidnapping and penetrative sexual assault of a minor under IPC and POCSO Act, affirming the reliability of the victim's testimony and statutory presumptions despite absence of DNA evidence and independent witnesses.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Sub Vikram Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting its review to jurisdictional errors.
Major Anish Muralidhar Army v. EX NK Krishnarao Gurugubelli
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted.
Anish Muralidhar Army v. Ex Sub Niraj Ranjan JC 377479Y
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law.
Prem Raj Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Labour Tribunal to permit evidence before deciding a retired workman's claim for medical reimbursement despite absence of a medical card, rejecting summary adjudication.
Babulal Mundhara v. Sanjeev Soni & Ors.
The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition challenging the trial court's dismissal of procedural applications.
Sahiba Creations India Private Limited and Ors. v. Ms. Shelly Syal
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging an interim order as infructuous since the suit was already disposed of by a decree, declining to interfere under Article 227.
Union of India v. Sh Prakash Mani Tripathi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the dismissal of its revision petition on limitation grounds, holding that failure to seek condonation of delay justified the dismissal and refusing to interfere under Article 227.
Sumant Kumar Sharma v. Jagjeet Singh
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to close the defendant's evidence due to repeated delays but granted one final opportunity subject to costs.
SAR TRANSPORT SYSTEMS PVT LTD v. M/S ROSS INTERNATIONAL
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to allow amendment of the written statement in a commercial suit, emphasizing judicial discretion and adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act.
Siddharth Rao v. Asjeet Singh Lamba
The Delhi High Court set aside the order striking off the defence without notice under Order XV-A CPC and directed the trial court to issue notice and reconsider the matter afresh.
Harpreet Singh Batra v. Sunita Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recalled non-bailable warrants against a company director issued by the NCDRC, directing deposit of the decretal amount and appearance before the Commission, emphasizing fairness in enforcement of consumer decrees.
Rita Rikh v. Arvind Kumar Gautam
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to initiate contempt proceedings but allowed revival of a dismissed application under Order XV-A CPC due to defendant's failure to honor rent payment assurance.