Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Raj Kumar Kedia v. Income Tax Office
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of prosecution sanction granted by Principal Director under the Income Tax Act and dismissed petitions challenging criminal complaints for tax evasion via accommodation entries.
Sumit Bhattacharya v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 419 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principle that criminal proceedings can be terminated to secure the ends of justice where no coercion or fraud exists.
Subhash Chander and Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all related proceedings under BNSS based on a voluntary amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process and contrary to justice.
ACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP v. COMMUNICATION COMPONENTS ANTENNA INC.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw a commercial appeal with liberty to pursue other remedies, disposing of the appeal as withdrawn.
Lalit Kumar @ Nandi v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a serious assault case, emphasizing his cooperation with investigation and absence of flight risk, subject to conditions.
Kailash Devi v. Tej Pal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize and expeditiously dispose of a 30-year-old civil suit filed by an elderly plaintiff seeking possession and damages.
Twinkle Vinayak v. Vishal Verma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction to expedite a pending divorce proceeding, holding that no time-bound disposal can be directed without compelling hardship and heavy pendency justifies no interference.
Surya Prakash v. Krishna Gaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that summons served via WhatsApp and newspaper publication constitute valid service under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Gurvinder Singh v. Praveen Nagpal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to consolidate four civil suits due to differing parties and issues but directed coordinated hearing to avoid conflicting judgments.
Rakesh Singh & Ors. v. Sushil Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking injunction against landlords and MCD, upholding expert findings that the building was unsafe and affirming the necessity of statutory eviction procedures for repairs.
Sahin Begum v. Shabnam & Ors.
The High Court held that an order on an injunction application is appealable and directed the petitioner to approach the trial court to address alleged violations of the undertaking regarding construction under the guise of necessary repairs.
Anil Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. Geeta & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's suo moto order fixing the matter for maintainability hearing, holding no compelling reason to interfere at this stage.
M/S. SHREE KARANGAR TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SACHIN ARORA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to admit additional documents at final arguments, emphasizing limited interference under Article 227 and the need for expeditious disposal of commercial suits.
Union of India and Ors. v. Radm Rajesh Singh (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disability arising post-entry is service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
M/S PACIFIC HOSPITALITY v. M/S MASSIVE RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim injunction restraining use of the 'Farzi Cafe' brand, clarifying that other reliefs must await arbitration and declining to decide on the arbitration agreement's existence.
Shubham Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to medically re-examine a candidate for fitness after six months post-hernia surgery and to consider his appointment against unfilled EWS vacancies if found fit.
Laxmi Chauhan v. Commissioner of Customs Airport and General
The Delhi High Court held that personal jewellery detained by Customs without issuance of Show Cause Notice and personal hearing must be released upon payment of redemption fine and penalty, affirming procedural safeguards under the Customs Act and Baggage Rules.
Qamar Jahan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed release of detained personal jewellery pending amendment of Baggage Rules, mandated compliance with Court orders on storage charges, and approved interim SOPs to regulate Customs detention procedures.
Novo Nordisk AS v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed expedited hearing of interim relief in a patent infringement suit, emphasizing the need to address export infringement issues without undue deferral.
Ram Chander v. Delhi Disaster Management Authority and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a contractual employee without issuing a show cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing violates natural justice and set aside the termination order.