Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
PHOENIX PVTLTD v. VIDYA SAGAR & ORS
The High Court directed the Civil Judge to expeditiously decide the petitioner’s application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC for modification or vacation of an injunction, disposing of the petitions on consent.
Dr Mirdul Kumar Sahani v. The Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an order voiding a homeopathy council election for failure to follow statutory procedure and principles of natural justice, remanding the matter for fresh decision after hearing the elected members.
Dr Bharat Kumar Singh v. The Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an order invalidating a council election for failure to follow mandatory procedural rules and principles of natural justice, remanding the matter for fresh decision after due hearing.
Indian Overseas Bank v. HDFC Bank Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a collecting banker who negligently opens an account and accepts a forged bank draft without due verification is liable for conversion and cannot claim protection under Sections 131 and 131-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Nand Lal Bhatia & Ors. v. Registrar of Companies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of directors due to non-filing by their company, directing activation of their DIN/DSC and allowing them to regularize under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, following the Sandeep Singh precedent.
Anil Kumar Goel & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of directors of a struck-off company pending their application for removal of the company’s name from the Register and directed reactivation of their DIN and DSC.
Madan Mohan Banga v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed compliance with Tribunal orders and timely disposal of a property dispute, dismissing the writ petition seeking procedural relief.
Gagandeep Singh and Anr v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners disqualified as directors for non-filing of returns to avail statutory condonation provisions and stayed their disqualification pending such application, applying directions from a prior similar case.
Puneet Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief to a disqualified Director by staying his disqualification and directing activation of his DIN and DSC pending his application for removal of struck-off companies under Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.
Sh. Mohd. Mehfooz v. Delhi Waqf Board and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction from Waqf property, affirming statutory lease procedures and granting limited time with rent payment for vacating the premises.
Rashtriya Rajdhani Kshetra Tipahiya Chalak Union Delhi v. Commissioner of Transport
The Delhi High Court directed strict enforcement of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and compliance with judicial orders to prevent unauthorized operation of out-of-state buses and taxis within Delhi.
Arunima Gupta and Anr. v. Department of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning Mohalla Clinics by directing the government to consider the petitioners' suggestions as a representation and incorporate them if appropriate, without issuing mandatory directions.
Union of India and Anr. v. Charan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing retrospective regularization of an employee after disciplinary proceedings were dropped, rejecting limitation and seniority objections.
VVA Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Improve Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that misjoinder objections not raised before the arbitrator are waived and factual findings on limitation and payments cannot be reappreciated under Section 34.
R P STONE CLINIC PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed that only the active Corporate Identification Number of the petitioner-company be used for filings, while the duplicate inactive CIN be excluded from e-filing, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
State NCT of Delhi v. Rajeev Yadav @ Raju
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual harassment case due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's evidence and unexplained delay in FIR registration, granting benefit of doubt to the accused.
Diwan Singh Yadav v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act where possession was taken and compensation deposited.
M/S. RESBIRD TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. v. M/S. R.S. TRAVEL & TOURS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a contract for exclusive use of a service platform is determinable and not specifically enforceable, dismissing the plaintiff's injunction application and confining the remedy to damages.
M/S. AMBIENCE HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. v. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to recall or rectify its order, holding that such applications cannot be used to seek rehearing or fresh decisions absent genuine clerical errors.
Tarun Kumar & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that directors of a company can be held liable for criminal breach of trust and conspiracy under IPC Sections 406, 420, and 120B, and refused to quash the FIR against them despite no direct allegation of inducement.