Keshav Kumar v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 28 Feb 2018 · 2018:DHC:8693-DB
S. Muralidhar; L.S. Mehta
W.P.(CRL) 638/2018
2018:DHC:8693-DB
other appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions with liberty to file appropriate petitions in accordance with law and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
rv - v' HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 638/2018 & Crl.M.A.No.3848/2018
KESHAV KUMAR ..... Petitioner Tlirough: Ms. Aiijali J. Manish, Advocate with
Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Nidhi Saini, Advocates.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. P.C. Yadav, CGSC with Ms. Ritu Gaur, Advocate for R-l/UOI.
Mr. Harpreet Singh, Standing Counsel for R-2 to 4.
W.P.(CRL) 639/2018 & Crl.M.A.No.3849/2018
NITIN MANAK Petitioner
Through: Ms. Anjali J.Manish, Advocate with Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Nidhi Saini, Advocates.
VERSUS
- UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. P.C. Yadav, CGSC with Ms. Ritu Gaur, Advocate for R-l/UOI.
Mr. Sanjeev Narula, SSC with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for R-2 to
4/Customs.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE LS. MEHTA
28.02.2018
ORDER

1. The learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the 2018:DHC:8693-DB petitions withHberty to file appropriate petitions in accordance wiih law.

2. The petitions as well as the applications are dismissed as withdrawn with the libert>' as prayed for.

FEBRUARY 28,2018 'anh' • S, MURALIDHAR, J. LS. MEHTA, J,