Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Farzand Ali v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside compensation based solely on circle rates in land acquisition, remanding for fresh evidence to determine true market value in line with Supreme Court precedent.
Anand Prakash G v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside compensation based solely on circle rates in land acquisition, remanding for fresh valuation based on objective evidence in line with Supreme Court precedent.
Mahenderkumar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that circle rates cannot be the sole basis for land acquisition compensation, set aside the Reference Court's order, and remanded the matter for fresh evidence and adjudication on market value.
jai Sahai Endlaw v. Kushal R. Akhtar
The court held that circle rates cannot be the sole basis for land acquisition compensation and remanded the matter for fresh valuation evidence and order.
Parvez Ahmed v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs arising from a trivial neighbor dispute after the parties amicably settled through mediation, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajeevto v. Alok Kum
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw criminal miscellaneous petitions without prejudice to defenses, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn and granting exemptions from personal appearance.
Ashwanitomar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under Sections 308/34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Sanjay Kumar Mittal & Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of causing grievous injury during a financial dispute, subject to conditions ensuring their cooperation with the investigation.
Raj Kumar v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a rape case alleging consent obtained by false promise of marriage, emphasizing the primacy of prosecutrix testimony and imposing conditions to protect the trial.
Yogesh Bansal & Anr v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award, despite prior court litigation.
Karan Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and decide upon the petitioners' representation seeking extension of enhanced gratuity benefits to CDA Pay Pattern retirees, emphasizing procedural fairness and issuance of a speaking order.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Sakina Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, upholding the compensation awarded to the deceased employee's dependents and declining the insurer's claim for recovery rights due to lack of evidence.
M/S SANGHI MEDICAL CENTRE P. LTD v. DR. MANIK RANJAN DUTTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a suit for non-payment of costs due to procedural confusion from case transfer, restored the suit, and allowed deletion of a deceased party's name without substitution.
G S Sodhi v. NTPC Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking mandamus for pension benefits directing the petitioner to first make a representation to the respondents before approaching the court.
SHRI SANDEEP AGGARWAL & ORS v. SHRI JAI SINGH & ANR
The court held that the limitation period for filing objections to execution of a decree begins from discovery of fraud, not from the date of execution, and remanded the matter for inquiry on merits.
Shamshad & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR involving serious sexual offences despite delay and settlement, emphasizing the need for investigation when prosecutrix's statements are consistent.
Madan Lal Wadhwa v. Gurpreet Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition directing government authorities to inspect disputed premises and submit a binding report to resolve a property dispute involving common lavatory facilities and encroachment claims.
S K Gupta v. National Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that denial of stagnation increments based on uncommunicated adverse confidential reports violates natural justice and directed the employer to communicate and reconsider the petitioner’s service record before deciding on increments.
Manju & Anr v. Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying future prospects and the correct multiplier as per the Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi judgment.
VERSUS
The Delhi High Court quashed the 2004 DoPT Communication that included salary income in creamy layer determination for PSU employees, directing adherence to the 1993 Office Memorandum criteria excluding salary income.