Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Seema Rani & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

30 Jul 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:6265

The Delhi High Court directed temporary de-sealing of petitioners' shops to enable rectification of unauthorized constructions, with subsequent inspection and consideration for permanent de-sealing by the MCD.

administrative petition_allowed temporary de-sealing unauthorized construction Municipal Corporation of Delhi rectification work

Ravi v. Union of India

30 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6228-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing a Review DPC to be conducted as per rules, holding no grievance arose from the Tribunal's disposal without impleading the petitioner.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal Review Departmental Promotion Committee Promotion Impleadment

Poonam Narula & Anr. v. Brahm Lal

30 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6321

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to admit irrelevant title documents executed by the plaintiff in favor of third parties during the pendency of an appeal in a possession suit.

civil petition_dismissed Order XLI Rules 27 & 28 CPC Section 151 CPC newly discovered documents relevancy of evidence

Sheru Gupta and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.

30 Jul 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:6247

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust and an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita amicable settlement abuse of process of law

Jagdish v. State NCT of Delhi

30 Jul 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:6298

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner a one-week parole on conditions, recognizing recent good conduct despite prior punishments, to assist his family in relocating their house.

criminal petition_allowed parole jail conduct Indian Penal Code Sections 326A and 326B habitual offender

Mukesh Kumar Bhardwaj v. Gauri Shankar & Anr.

30 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6315

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to admit documents on record due to suppression of prior withdrawal of an application, emphasizing litigant diligence and full disclosure under Section 151 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Section 151 CPC Order XLI Rule 27 CPC Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India

Ajay Kumar Maurya v. Suraj Chaudhary & Ors.

30 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6318

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to implead the defendants' father as a necessary party in a recovery suit based on an agreement to sell, holding that belated impleadment without sufficient justification is not permissible.

civil petition_dismissed Order I Rule 10 CPC impleadment necessary party agreement to sell

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Raj Kumar Goel

30 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6320

The High Court refused to interfere with the Trial Court's order closing the defendant's right to file a written statement without condonation of delay, directing the Trial Court to decide the pending application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC before passing any decree.

civil other written statement condonation of delay Order VIII Rule 1 CPC commercial suit

Anijay Tyagi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

30 Jul 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:6264

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner additional time to comply with demolition directions due to medical grounds, allowing filing of a regularization application and directing expeditious consideration by the MCD.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition Municipal Corporation of Delhi demolition order regularization application

Madhukar Road Carriers v. Krishana & Ors.

29 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7358

The Delhi High Court remanded a motor accident claim appeal to the Tribunal to reconsider insurer's recovery rights based on the driver's valid hazardous goods training and license certification, allowing additional evidence and imposing costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 recovery rights insurance policy breach hazardous goods transportation

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Himmat Singh & Anr

29 Jul 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7262
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to set aside a duplicative Rs.50,000/- compensation awarded twice for loss of amenities in a motor accident claim, upholding the rest of the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of amenities duplication of damages

Hemu Gautam v. State of NCT of Delhi

29 Jul 2025 · Arun Monga · 2025:DHC:6909

The Delhi High Court held that prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC and Section 140 of the Delhi Police Act is mandatory before prosecuting police officials for acts done in official capacity, dismissing the petition seeking FIR registration without such sanction.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant prior sanction Section 197 CrPC Delhi Police Act Section 140 police officials prosecution

Aryan Residency Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 16, Delhi

29 Jul 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:6195-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment for AY 2014-15 pursuant to a search in AY 2024-25 is barred by limitation under Section 153A and set aside the reopening notice.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 153A limitation period

Shashank Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 16, Delhi

29 Jul 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:6191-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment for AY 2014-15 pursuant to a search conducted in 2024 is barred by limitation under pre-amended Section 153A, quashing the notice issued under Section 148.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 153A limitation period

PROPRIETECT L P v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS

29 Jul 2025 · Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:6510

The Delhi High Court set aside the Controller's order rejecting a patent application for raising new objections without prior notice and failing to consider submissions, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patents Act, 1970 Section 2(1)(j) novelty Section 2(1)(ja) inventive step Section 10(4)(c) clarity

Laxmi Hari Collection v. The Additional Commissioner Delhi - West, Central Goods and Services Tax

29 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6363-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST penalty orders for fraudulent credit availing, holding that statutory appellate remedies must be pursued and allegations of identity misuse require factual inquiry.

tax petition_dismissed GST penalty fraudulent input tax credit GST registration misuse writ jurisdiction

Mr. Amit v. Parvesh

29 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6179-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a candidate whose juvenile criminal involvement could not be held against him under the Juvenile Justice Acts.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant juvenile justice cancellation of candidature juvenile offence police recruitment

Krishan Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6225-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition on pro-rata pension with liberty to approach the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming the Tribunal's exclusive jurisdiction over such claims.

administrative petition_allowed pro-rata pension Armed Forces Tribunal jurisdiction writ petition

Tata Play Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/ Avato

29 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:6172-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Show Cause Notice issued to Tata Play Ltd. was within the statutory limitation period and adequate opportunity for hearing was afforded, dismissing the writ petition and directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.

tax petition_dismissed Significant CGST Act limitation Show Cause Notice Input Tax Credit Personal Hearing

Davander Rawat v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 16, Delhi

29 Jul 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:6194-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2014-15 initiated beyond the ten-year block period computed from the search year are barred by limitation and quashed the reopening notice under Section 148.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 153A limitation period