Delhi High Court
30,090 judgments
Rihan Khan @Dulare v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with abetment to suicide and dowry harassment, relying on the suicide note and supportive testimony of the deceased's parents.
Deepak Mishra v. The NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious harassment and sexual offence case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial, delay in FIR registration, contradictions in prosecution evidence, and absence of risk of tampering.
Qamar Ikbal v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused alleged to have facilitated a large-scale cyber cheating racket by providing bank accounts, holding that custodial detention was necessary at the investigation's initial stage.
Vikas Kumar Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful towing and seizure of a vehicle parked in a public place under the 2024 Delhi Guidelines and directed its release upon compliance with prescribed procedures.
Seema Rani & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed temporary de-sealing of petitioners' shops to enable rectification of unauthorized constructions, with subsequent inspection and consideration for permanent de-sealing by the MCD.
Ravi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing a Review DPC to be conducted as per rules, holding no grievance arose from the Tribunal's disposal without impleading the petitioner.
Poonam Narula & Anr. v. Brahm Lal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to admit irrelevant title documents executed by the plaintiff in favor of third parties during the pendency of an appeal in a possession suit.
Sheru Gupta and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust and an abuse of process.
Jagdish v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner a one-week parole on conditions, recognizing recent good conduct despite prior punishments, to assist his family in relocating their house.
Mukesh Kumar Bhardwaj v. Gauri Shankar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to admit documents on record due to suppression of prior withdrawal of an application, emphasizing litigant diligence and full disclosure under Section 151 CPC.
Ajay Kumar Maurya v. Suraj Chaudhary & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to implead the defendants' father as a necessary party in a recovery suit based on an agreement to sell, holding that belated impleadment without sufficient justification is not permissible.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Raj Kumar Goel
The High Court refused to interfere with the Trial Court's order closing the defendant's right to file a written statement without condonation of delay, directing the Trial Court to decide the pending application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC before passing any decree.
Anijay Tyagi v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner additional time to comply with demolition directions due to medical grounds, allowing filing of a regularization application and directing expeditious consideration by the MCD.
Madhukar Road Carriers v. Krishana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded a motor accident claim appeal to the Tribunal to reconsider insurer's recovery rights based on the driver's valid hazardous goods training and license certification, allowing additional evidence and imposing costs.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Himmat Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to set aside a duplicative Rs.50,000/- compensation awarded twice for loss of amenities in a motor accident claim, upholding the rest of the award.
Hemu Gautam v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC and Section 140 of the Delhi Police Act is mandatory before prosecuting police officials for acts done in official capacity, dismissing the petition seeking FIR registration without such sanction.
Aryan Residency Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 16, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment for AY 2014-15 pursuant to a search in AY 2024-25 is barred by limitation under Section 153A and set aside the reopening notice.
Shashank Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 16, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment for AY 2014-15 pursuant to a search conducted in 2024 is barred by limitation under pre-amended Section 153A, quashing the notice issued under Section 148.
PROPRIETECT L P v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS
The Delhi High Court set aside the Controller's order rejecting a patent application for raising new objections without prior notice and failing to consider submissions, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Laxmi Hari Collection v. The Additional Commissioner Delhi - West, Central Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST penalty orders for fraudulent credit availing, holding that statutory appellate remedies must be pursued and allegations of identity misuse require factual inquiry.