Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
TABLETS (INDIA) LIMITED v. M/S. SPEY MEDICALS PRIVATE LIMITED & THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a trademark opposition as deemed abandoned due to the opponent's failure to submit evidence or notify non-submission within prescribed timelines, affirming the mandatory nature of procedural compliance under the Trade Marks Act and Rules.
Celebi Ground Handling India Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of the petitioner's security clearance by BCAS on national security grounds, affirming the statutory authority to act without adherence to natural justice principles in such cases.
Somdutt v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a large-quantity NDPS case considering prolonged incarceration, slow trial progress, and absence of prima facie material indicating knowledge, clarifying the application of Section 37 NDPS presumption at bail stage.
Sahil Alias Bhondi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case due to lack of direct evidence and eyewitness identification, emphasizing that mere suspicion and circumstantial evidence are insufficient to deny bail.
State Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Jaidev
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions and imposed punitive sentences on police officers convicted of persistent sexual offences against neighbors, emphasizing proportionality and deterrence in sentencing.
Mr. Sumit Mishra; Ms. Muskan Gupta; Ms. Mokshita Sharma v. M/S Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that independent, non-executive, and nominee directors not involved in day-to-day management cannot be held liable under Section 141 NI Act, quashing summons against them, while upholding summons against directors actively managing the company.
Kanta Devi v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court held that prior medical examination during ad-hoc government service exempts an employee from fresh medical tests upon regular appointment, entitling the family to pension despite non-submission of a fresh medical fitness certificate.
Shilpa v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was granted to the accused under the NDPS Act where only a co-accused's confessional statement implicated her and she was already on bail in other cases.
Savan v. State of NCT Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 69 BNS on the ground of amicable settlement between parties who subsequently married and are living together.
Rohit Khatri alias Jonty v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was granted to the accused due to incomplete and unreliable medical evidence and investigation despite allegations of grievous injuries.
Avon Solutions and Logistics Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to inadequate notice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Avon Solutions and Logistics Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper notice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S R.K. Jain and Sons Hospitality Services (P) Ltd v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement, leaving merits to the arbitral tribunal.
Atul Goyal v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act following amicable settlement and payment of dues, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Roopa Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1)
The Delhi High Court quashed the time-barred Section 148 notice for AY 2015-16, holding TOLA 2020 inapplicable and reaffirming the limitation period under Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Rajesh Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 43(1)
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of disputed Income Tax notices and orders under Sections 148 and 148A, emphasizing procedural compliance and opportunity of hearing.
Manish Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-34(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the challenge to the Section 148 notice and Section 148A(d) order for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer after hearing the petitioner, following recent Supreme Court precedents.
M/S TRANS INDIA LOGISTICS v. GSTO, WARD-60 & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to improper notice of Show Cause Notices and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Roopa Goyal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of notices issued under Section 148 and related provisions of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15, directing reasoned orders within four weeks.
B.C. Enterprises v. Income Tax Officer Ward 58(3) Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the reassessment proceedings under Section 148/148A of the Income Tax Act for fresh consideration, directing the Assessing Officer to hear the petitioner and pass reasoned orders within four weeks.