Delhi High Court

30,090 judgments

Year:

Mr. Amit v. Parvesh

29 Jul 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6179-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a candidate whose juvenile criminal involvement could not be held against him under the Juvenile Justice Acts.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant juvenile justice cancellation of candidature juvenile offence police recruitment

Krishan Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6225-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition on pro-rata pension with liberty to approach the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming the Tribunal's exclusive jurisdiction over such claims.

administrative petition_allowed pro-rata pension Armed Forces Tribunal jurisdiction writ petition

Tata Play Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/ Avato

29 Jul 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:6172-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Show Cause Notice issued to Tata Play Ltd. was within the statutory limitation period and adequate opportunity for hearing was afforded, dismissing the writ petition and directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.

tax petition_dismissed Significant CGST Act limitation Show Cause Notice Input Tax Credit Personal Hearing

Davander Rawat v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 16, Delhi

29 Jul 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:6194-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2014-15 initiated beyond the ten-year block period computed from the search year are barred by limitation and quashed the reopening notice under Section 148.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 153A limitation period

Anita Jha v. Union of India and Ors

29 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6222-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner’s request without adjudicating the substantive issues.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal of petition dismissal as withdrawn High Court of Delhi

Mohan Lal Besarwadiya & Ors. v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

29 Jul 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:6248

The Delhi High Court upheld the RBI's eligibility criteria restricting Assistant Manager (Protocol and Security) recruitment to ex-servicemen as defined by statute, excluding CAPF personnel, finding no arbitrariness or violation of equality rights.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant ex-servicemen Central Armed Police Forces eligibility criteria reservation

Ms. Bindiya L. Airi v. National Highway Authority of India

29 Jul 2025 · Jyoti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that parties must nominate arbitrators from the broad-based SAROD panel as per the arbitration agreement and SAROD Rules, upholding institutional arbitration and balancing party autonomy with impartiality.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 SAROD Rules Appointment of Arbitrators

Nishu Maurya v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Jul 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:6210

The Delhi High Court held that repeated biometric authentication interruptions during NEET (UG) 2025 caused actual loss of exam time to the petitioner, entitling her to compensatory marks and a revised rank without disturbing other candidates’ positions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant NEET (UG) 2025 biometric authentication Aadhaar examination interruptions

Gokaran Prasad Awadhiya v. Delhi Traffic Police and Anr.

29 Jul 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:6262

The Delhi High Court directed the release of a seized End of Life Vehicle upon compliance with procedural guidelines and undertakings restricting its use and parking in public areas within NCR Delhi.

administrative petition_allowed End of Life Vehicle Motor Vehicle Scrapping Rules 2021 Vehicle seizure Vehicle release procedure

Shiv Kumar v. Union of India

29 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6208-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the petitioner’s disqualification from Indian Navy recruitment, holding the disqualification valid based on corrected and verified examination marks.

administrative petition_dismissed recruitment disqualification Indian Navy written examination

Cdr A Swapna v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6229-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that service matters amenable to the Armed Forces Tribunal cannot be entertained by the High Court as a court of first instance and transferred the writ petition accordingly.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Armed Forces Tribunal service matters Short Service Commissioned officers permanent commission

Neeraj Singh Rana v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

29 Jul 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6299

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 380 IPC as the cancellation report was accepted and the protest petition was pending, holding that such proceedings cannot be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR cancellation report Section 380 IPC

Inder Kumar v. Surinder Kumar

29 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6326

The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant to examine two official witnesses after closure of evidence in a property possession suit, imposing costs for delay and restricting further opportunities.

civil appeal_allowed examination of witnesses closure of evidence civil suit possession

Morphing Innovations OPC Pvt Ltd v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Anr

29 Jul 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:6323-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld NHIDCL's annulment of a tender due to the petitioner's failure to submit Performance Security within granted extensions, holding that extension requests are discretionary and not an absolute right.

administrative petition_dismissed Performance Security Extension of time Tender annulment Letter of Acceptance

MST Nayab Begum v. Arman Ullah Qureshi & Anr.

29 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6340

The Delhi High Court allowed additional evidence through the plaintiff's daughter-in-law due to the plaintiff's paralysis, balancing procedural delay against medical incapacity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant civil suit cancellation of sale deed medical incapacity additional evidence

Nikhil Tripathi v. Neelam Sharma

29 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6342
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to examine a witness irrelevant to the facts in issue in a suit for possession and recovery of rent arrears based solely on a rent agreement.

civil petition_dismissed rent agreement possession suit recovery of arrears expert opinion

Shri Akash Malhotra v. Sangeeta Mahajan & Ors.

29 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6338

The High Court declined to interfere with the pending injunction application in a suit for specific performance and directed the petitioner to seek expeditious disposal from the Trial Court.

civil petition_dismissed specific performance injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC Section 151 CPC

Pritpal Singh Bhatia v. Narender Kumar

29 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6343

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking waiver of costs imposed by the trial court, holding that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot be invoked to reduce costs unless they are unconscionable or unwarranted.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 of Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction costs waiver of costs

Vinod Gupta v. M/S B K TRADERS

29 Jul 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:6339

The High Court allowed recall of a witness under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC to rectify an inadvertent error in document reference during examination-in-chief, emphasizing fair trial and discretion of the Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC recall of witness inadvertent error examination-in-chief

Union of India & Ors. v. CMDA Anand Balakrishnan

29 Jul 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6233-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related absent contrary proof and limiting writ interference to errors of law apparent on record.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction