Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. v. VIKRAM SURI TRADING AS M/S ARMEX AUTO INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court held that service of a counter statement by email without an email ID provided by the opponent does not constitute valid service under Section 143 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and set aside the order deeming the opposition abandoned.
Radhe Shyam Goel v. The State (Government of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 304-A IPC arising from a death caused by an earthquake, holding that no rash or negligent act was committed and the parties had settled the matter.
Saroj v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Karn Gupta v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a director who has resigned validly cannot be disqualified under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 due to the company’s failure to file Form 32, and quashed the petitioner’s disqualification.
R.G. v. P.G.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order granting temporary custody of the minor child to the mother during summer vacation, emphasizing the child's best interest and balanced parental rights.
DIG (ADM) ITBP & ANR v. MALA BANSAL & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation for injuries and death in a motor accident, adjusted for contributory negligence, and ruled that Court of Enquiry findings are not binding on non-participating claimants.
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S Rishabh & Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award on insurance claim disputes, holding the award validly based on sufficient material and the arbitrator properly appointed with parties' consent.
Ranbir Bharti v. S.L.S. DAV Public School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed correction of a student's Class X certificate to reflect her natural parents' names after wrongful substitution by guardians in school and CBSE records.
Indu Munshi and Ors. v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the government's appeal, holding that Kashmiri migrant teachers appointed on contractual basis without regular recruitment are not entitled to regularization or parity in pay and benefits with regular teachers.
Indu Munshi and Ors. v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the judgment favoring government school teachers' service rights, rejected the Government of NCT Delhi's appeal, and allowed the teachers' appeal setting aside the contrary judgment.
Sumitra Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for injunction protecting disputed land after binding defendants to their statement of non-action, holding that unregistered documents do not confer title and demarcation reports are binding.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. KISHORE SHARMA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld the Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.4,42,000/- as just and reasonable compensation for injuries sustained by the respondent in a motor vehicle accident.
NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD. v. M.J. AKBAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's defamation suit and appeal for condonation of delay due to repeated failure to lead evidence and undue delay, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and court time management.
Manoj Kumar Mishra v. CBI
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 13(1)(d)(i) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, abuse of official position is not a necessary ingredient for criminal misconduct by corrupt or illegal means, acquitted the appellant on that count but upheld conviction for cheating by impersonation under Section 419 IPC.
Manoj @ Monu & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellants of murder charges due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and insufficient corroborative evidence, granting them the benefit of doubt.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. CHARAN PREET
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld the compensation awarded to the injured motorcyclist for pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life as just and reasonable.
Escobar Tapas Bar & Anr. v. Impresario Entertainment & Hospitality Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the extension of an interim injunction pending filing of the suit in the court of proper territorial jurisdiction, upholding the return of plaint and temporary injunction extension as per a consent order.
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Axis Bank Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a bank guarantee can be invoked multiple times during its validity and that a subsequent agreement between the beneficiary and principal debtor does not extinguish the bank's liability unless a fresh guarantee is issued.
Prime Minister's National Relief Fund v. Aseem Takyar
The Delhi High Court held that the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund is a public authority under the RTI Act and must disclose donor and beneficiary information, balancing transparency with privacy exemptions.
M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED v. UMESH RAI
The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal in a loan recovery suit, holding that certified electronic evidence under Section 65B is admissible and suits cannot be dismissed on technical grounds like non-production of original loan recall notice when loan default is admitted.