Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
All India Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Retired Executives’ Association & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging BSNL Office Memoranda for lack of jurisdiction, directing petitioners to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Pramod Kumar v. Association of State Road Transport Undertaking & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the authority to consider the petitioner's representation against a fresh advertisement altering eligibility criteria before finalizing the selection, ensuring procedural fairness.
Shyam Lal Jani & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging ONGC's Security Officer selection, holding that courts should not interfere with expert committee decisions absent mala fide or procedural irregularity.
Commissioner of Customs v. Arif Khichi
The Delhi High Court held that the Customs Tribunal must decide on the jurisdiction of DRI officers to issue show cause notices on merits rather than remanding the matter pending Supreme Court decision, allowing the Revenue's appeal.
AK V S K
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal for divorce on grounds of cruelty due to failure to provide specific, detailed allegations and evidence as required under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Puneet Jain v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 175 IPC after the petitioner complied with directions under Section 91 Cr.P.C. by providing requisite information related to a sting operation.
Puneet Jain v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 175 IPC for alleged non-compliance of Section 91 Cr.P.C. directions after the petitioner furnished the requisite information and the original devices were not in their possession.
Puneet Jain v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings under Section 175 IPC against a petitioner who complied with investigative directions under Section 91 Cr.P.C. by providing the requisite information.
Alka Jindal v. AIMS SANYA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting refund with interest but rejected additional compensation claims for delay, holding that assured returns and delay compensation cannot be claimed concurrently.
Radha v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of narcotics and excise offences, emphasizing that past acquittals and compliance with bail conditions justify bail despite allegations of possession of illicit liquor and ganja.
Devender v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple petitions on illegal constructions, deferring to the Supreme Court's ongoing supervision and the Special Task Force constituted by the Delhi Development Authority, directing petitioners to seek relief through these authorities.
Help Indian Against Corruption v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions on unauthorized constructions directing petitioners to approach the DDA's Special Task Force constituted under Supreme Court supervision for enforcement.
M/S H.T MEDIA LTD & ANR v. SUSHEEL KUMAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and damages against defendants for willful trademark infringement and passing off involving deceptively similar domain names and marks, emphasizing punitive damages for contempt and mala fide conduct.
Arvind Techno Engineers Pvt Ltd v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting additional cost claims based on soil condition discrepancies, affirming the enforceability of contractual clauses requiring independent verification and excluding such claims.
Gurinder Singh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that mere physical possession of a live cartridge without conscious knowledge does not constitute an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act and quashed the FIR and proceedings against the petitioner.
Saptaparna Sikdar v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment on the ground that the petitioner failed to join within the stipulated time despite receiving due communication, affirming that lack of diligence disentitles a selected candidate from appointment.
Tahsildar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that judicial review does not permit upgrading of APAR ratings or promotion unless there is perversity, and upheld the refusal to promote the petitioner based on objective assessment.
Pravesh Gulati v. Director of Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent-School to consider and decide the petitioner’s pre-retirement application for re-employment within a stipulated timeframe, ensuring administrative compliance and enabling legal recourse.
Rajeev Chaudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Food Corporation of India to treat the petitioners' Legal Notice as a representation, pass a speaking order within eight weeks, and withhold finalization of seniority lists pending such decision.
Rajesh Kumar Jha & Anr v. Baij Nath Ray & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and revived the motor accident claim petition, holding that the tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on jurisdictional grounds without properly considering the appellants' residence documents and giving them an opportunity to prove their residence.