Full Text
Translation output
LPA 286/2015 & LPA 620/2015
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Reserved on: 12.04.2018 Pronounced on: 23.05.2018
LPA 286/2015, REV.PET.374/2016, C.M. APPL.12086/2017
INDU MUNSHI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
INDU MUNSHI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents
LPA 620/2015, C.M. APPL.47017/2017
GOVT. OF NCT DELHI ..... Appellant
GOVT. OF NCT DELHI ..... Appellant
VERSUS
GOVT. SCHOOL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION (MIGRANTS)
REGD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Sh. Ramesh Wangnoo, Advocate, in Rev.Pet.374/2016.
Sh. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Sh. B.L. Wali and Sh.
Gaurav Kohli, Advocates, for petitioners, in LPA 620/2015.
Sh. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Yeeshu Jain, ASC and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates, for GNCTD.
Sh. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate, for UOI.
Sh. Kumar Rajesh Singh and Ms. Punam Singh, Advocates, for
EDMC, in Rev. Pet. 374/2016.
Sh. Rajan Tyagi, ASC with Ms. Reema Khurana, Advocate, for
SDMC and Ms. Muktamay Mandal, AD (Edn), in Rev.
Pet.374/2016.
REGD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Sh. Ramesh Wangnoo, Advocate, in Rev.Pet.374/2016.
Sh. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Sh. B.L. Wali and Sh.
Gaurav Kohli, Advocates, for petitioners, in LPA 620/2015.
Sh. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Yeeshu Jain, ASC and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates, for GNCTD.
Sh. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate, for UOI.
Sh. Kumar Rajesh Singh and Ms. Punam Singh, Advocates, for
EDMC, in Rev. Pet. 374/2016.
Sh. Rajan Tyagi, ASC with Ms. Reema Khurana, Advocate, for
SDMC and Ms. Muktamay Mandal, AD (Edn), in Rev.
Pet.374/2016.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
2018:DHC:3391-DB
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
2018:DHC:3391-DB
LPA 286/2015 & LPA 620/2015
JUDGMENT
1. The judgment in W.P. (C) 3989/2010 is upheld; the Govt of NCT of Delhi’s appeal (LPA 620/2015) is rejected; LPA 286/2015 – preferred by the teachers is allowed; the impugned judgment in W.P.(C) 2574/2010 is set aside for the above reasons. There shall be no order on costs.
2. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 23.05.2018 in LPA 286/2015 may be referred to.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
(JUDGE)
DEEPA SHARMA (JUDGE) MAY 23, 2018