Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Sanjay Kumar Valmiki v. State

24 May 2018 · S.P. Garg; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:3470-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for the rape and murder of an 8-year-old girl, relying on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape murder kidnapping DNA evidence

Raju@ Chanakya v. The State

24 May 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:3474

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder under Section 302 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and after examination of material witnesses, subject to protective conditions.

criminal bail_granted bail Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence DNA report

Prabir Mukherjee v. Orient Bell Ltd

24 May 2018 · S. P. Garg · 2018:DHC:3473

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order directing the petitioner to furnish proof of solvency of surety in Section 138 NI Act proceedings, dismissing the revision petition.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act bail bond solvency proof surety

Tarini Mehta v. Sanjeev Chhabra & Ors.

24 May 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:3454

The court held that life interest holders cannot alienate their life estate, invalidated the sale deed by such holders to strangers, and granted injunction restraining possession pending trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant life interest vested interest Indian Succession Act Transfer of Property Act

Competition Commission of India and Anr. v. Oriental Rubber Industries Private Limited

24 May 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3453-DB

The Delhi High Court held that persons summoned for investigation by the Director General under the Competition Act have the right to be represented by advocates, subject to procedural safeguards to ensure investigation efficacy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Competition Act, 2002 Director General investigation Right to legal representation Advocates Act, 1961 Section 30

Nirmal @ Nirmala & Anr. v. Ram Chand

24 May 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:3455

The Delhi High Court dismissed an application for substitution of parties under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC, holding that the Applicants were neither necessary nor proper parties and that title claims based on a disputed conveyance deed could not justify substitution.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 10 CPC substitution of parties conveyance deed power of attorney

Punjab National Bank v. Kamlesh Trehan & Anr

24 May 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:3481

The Delhi High Court set aside the premature dismissal of Punjab National Bank's suits alleging fraud, restoring the suits for trial and permitting impleadment of the deceased employee's legal heirs, emphasizing procedural fairness and proper adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Punjab National Bank fraudulent transactions imprest account maintainability of suit

Surajmal Yadav v. Delhi State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

24 May 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3482

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral award must address all claims with reasons, and where a claim is omitted, the aggrieved party may seek relief in separate proceedings without assuming implied rejection.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 31(3) Section 43(4)

Manpreet Kaur v. The State

24 May 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3469

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection from arrest to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery offences until after her final examinations, directing her to surrender thereafter.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail interim protection Section 420 IPC Section 468 IPC

Meera Devi v. Joginder Singh & Ors.

24 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:3467

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing assessed disability, income, and heads of damages including attendant charges and artificial limb cost, directing the insurer to pay Rs. 10.56 lakh with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim functional disability compensation enhancement loss of income

Subhasini Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.

24 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:3466

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment under the Central Government's scheme, emphasizing compliance with government directions by bodies governed by bye-laws.

administrative petition_allowed Significant compassionate appointment contractual employee bye-laws Central Government directions

National Highways Authority of India v. TGV Projects and Investments Private Limited

24 May 2018 · Vibhu Bahru · 2018:DHC:3477
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award granting force majeure relief for reduced toll traffic due to floods and penalty interest not contemplated by contract, holding such relief contrary to contract terms and public policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant force majeure arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act penalty clause

Kalka Public School v. N.B. Tiwari & Ors.

24 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:3468

The Delhi High Court held that the first respondent's resignation was deemed approved by the Directorate of Education due to statutory silence, setting aside the order directing reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant resignation deemed approval Rule 114A Delhi School Education Act

Megh Raj Dhaka v. New India Assurance Co Ltd & Ors.

24 May 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:3463

The Delhi High Court allowed the vehicle owner's appeal, holding that a driver with a valid license for a Light Motor Vehicle is competent to drive a transport vehicle under 7500 kgs despite a name discrepancy, and set aside the insurer's recovery rights against the owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant driving license authorization to drive typographical error Light Motor Vehicle

Sh. Ravinder Yadav v. Union of India

24 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:3464

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against his removal from service for misconduct involving overfilling a petroleum tanker, directing the appeal be decided on merits.

administrative other departmental inquiry removal from service overfilling tanker petroleum safety

Doctor Vinod Sharma and Anr. v. Medical Council of India and Ors.

24 May 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:3465

The Delhi High Court condoned the delay in filing an appeal before the Medical Council of India and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on merits after hearing all parties.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Medical Council of India Delhi Medical Council appeal limitation

The Commissioner of Income Tax v. Pawan Kumar Jain

24 May 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:3472-DB

The High Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on whether cash amounts held as imprest constitute loans attracting penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax other Significant Section 269SS Section 271D Income Tax Act, 1961 penalty

Manisha Vij & Ors. v. M/S HSIL Ltd

24 May 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:3475-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal permitting the defendants to file additional documents after framing of issues, holding that delay alone cannot justify rejection without considering relevancy and necessity for just adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 1A(3) CPC additional documents delay in filing relevancy of documents

Shri Tek Chand Narula and Ors. v. N.D.M.C. and Anr.

24 May 2018 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:3476-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a pre-dated property tax enhancement order and granted the petitioners a fresh hearing to submit documents and raise all grounds.

administrative appeal_allowed Property Tax NDMC Act 1994 Section 72 Writ Petition

DELHI INTEGRATED MULTI MODAL TRANSIT SYSTEM LTD v. M/S R. S. SHARMA CONTRACTORS PVT LTD

24 May 2018 · Vibhu BakhrU, J · 2018:DHC:3478

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for loss of profits and held that a settlement letter accepting full and final payment discharges the contract unless coercion is proven by credible evidence.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Accord and satisfaction Coercion