Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

M/S ALPHA OMEGA RESOULUTION CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. v. THE MANAGER ICICI BANK LTD & ORS.

30 May 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3594

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking mandatory injunction to recover Rs. 5 lakhs allegedly deposited by mistake, holding the appellant failed to prove bonafide mistake or coercion under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act.

civil appeal_dismissed mandatory injunction payment by mistake Section 72 Indian Contract Act debit balance

Poonam Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

30 May 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3598

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a suit for damages for negligence causing death filed beyond the prescribed limitation period is barred, and the cause of action arises on the date of injury, not on subsequent judicial findings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation cause of action negligence damages

Ruchika Singh Chhabra v. M/S. Air France India and Anr.

30 May 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:3592-DB

Delhi High Court holds it has jurisdiction and invalidates Air France's ICC constitution for non-compliance with POSH Act, directing reconstitution and fresh inquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Sexual Harassment Internal Complaints Committee POSH Act 2013 Territorial Jurisdiction

Antrix Corporation Ltd. v. Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd.

30 May 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:3591-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that appeals under the Commercial Courts Act in arbitration matters are limited to orders under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, the court at the arbitration seat has exclusive jurisdiction, and prior non-maintainable petitions do not bar subsequent applications under Section 42.

commercial appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Section 42 jurisdiction Commercial Courts Act, 2015

Rameshwar Gopal v. Anil Atrey

30 May 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3590

The Delhi High Court held that a seller must refund amounts received under an Agreement to Sell if no loss is proved from the buyer's breach, dismissing the appeal against refund of Rs. 28.50 lacs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Specific Performance Refund of Amount Breach of Contract

Asianet Satellite Communication Pvt. Ltd. v. Star India Pvt. Ltd.

30 May 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:3589

The Delhi High Court upheld the Telecom Tribunal's interim order requiring the petitioners to enter into either a negotiated or RIO based agreement with Star India, refusing to interfere with the regulatory framework pending final adjudication.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal Digital Addressable System Reference Interconnect Offer Broadcasting agreement

Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.

30 May 2018 · I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:2959

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging forgery of design registration documents due to lack of prima facie evidence and bar of limitation, emphasizing careful judicial scrutiny before summoning accused.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Forgery Design Registration Statement of Novelty Section 482 CrPC

Ninika Dhawan v. Union of India & Anr

29 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:3581

The Delhi High Court held that challenges to penalty marks in the Civil Services Examination fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 14(1)(a) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and are not maintainable before the High Court.

administrative appeal_dismissed Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Section 14(1)(a) Central Administrative Tribunal Civil Services Examination

Ramesh Prasad Gupta v. Anita Devi & Ors.

29 May 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:3584

The Delhi High Court apportioned liability between the property owner and third-party demolition for a fatal accident, partially allowing the appeal and directing refund and release of compensation with interest.

civil appeal_allowed compensation negligence apportionment of liability property owner liability

Mera Baba Pvt. Ltd. v. Ram Lubhaya Puri & Ors.

29 May 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:3583
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that in absence of contractual forfeiture clause, defendants cannot forfeit advance payment and plaintiff is entitled to immediate recovery despite defendants' counter-claim for damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Agreement to Sell forfeiture earnest money advance payment

Fernas Construction India Pvt. Ltd. v. Artson Engineering Ltd.

29 May 2018 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2018:DHC:3585

The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that termination rights under the contract were subject to payment obligations and that delay in filing under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act requires sufficient cause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 condonation of delay termination clause

Vijay Gupta v. Krishan Babbar & Anr.

29 May 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:3586

The Delhi High Court held that entering into a brand outlet management agreement without court permission violated a status quo order, imposed monetary compensation, but discharged the contempt petition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition status quo order Brand Outlet Management Agreement lease agreement

Machine Tool (India) Limited v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt Ltd

29 May 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3587

The Delhi High Court held that prior notice under Section 34(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is mandatory, and failure to serve it renders the filing date invalid, leading to dismissal of delayed petitions challenging an arbitral award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34(5) prior notice limitation period

Shahwaiz Ahmed & Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

29 May 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3588-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of contractual employees appointed without government approval and recruitment rules, rejecting their claim for regularization and reinstatement.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant contractual appointment regularization Delhi Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad Act, 1998 termination of service

Anuj Sharma v. The State

29 May 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8436

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord based on a settlement between the parties, subject to payment of costs, and disposed of related anticipatory bail proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement agreement anticipatory bail

RKJAIN v. Registrar Cooperative Societies Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

29 May 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:8732-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar Cooperative Societies to process the petitioners' applications in accordance with earlier binding judgments, disposing of the writ petitions accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Registrar Cooperative Societies Writ Petition Directions of Court Processing of Applications

Aswini Kumar Goswami & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

29 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:3579

The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to file individual applications for transfer of fixed term contracts from AIATSL to Air India and mandated respondents to consider and decide these applications within a specified timeframe with a speaking order.

civil other fixed term contract contract renewal transfer of contract Air India Air Transport Services Limited

N. D. Taneja and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

29 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:3580

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent University to consider fresh representations by retired employees seeking switch-over from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme in light of a prior Division Bench decision, providing a procedural roadmap for redressal.

administrative other Procedural Contributory Provident Fund General Provident Fund Pension Scheme Representation

Indian Printing Packing and Allied Machinery Manufactures Association v. Shafiq Ahmed

29 May 2018 · Najmiwazir · 2018:DHC:9159

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeals and dismissed the appeals and pending applications as withdrawn.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn procedural order Indian Printing Packing and Allied Machinery Manufacturers Association

Daulat Ram v. State

29 May 2018 · A.K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:9103

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under Sections 323, 308, and 34 IPC at the investigation stage upon a genuine compromise between the parties.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR compromise Section 323 IPC Section 308 IPC