Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III v. M/S SUDEV INDUSTRIES LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that defective service of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, does not invalidate reassessment proceedings if the assessee had knowledge and participated, and allowed the Revenue's appeal setting aside the Tribunal's order.
S Santani Sales Organisation v. Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the 10% pre-deposit required for second appeals under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act is inclusive of the 7.5% pre-deposit made for the first appeal and applies to service tax appeals under the Finance Act, 1994.
Financial Software and Systems Private Limited v. The Competition Commission of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner cannot revive a writ petition after its appeal before the Competition Appellate Tribunal is dismissed on delay grounds, affirming the principle against pursuing two remedies simultaneously.
Mohan Singh Negi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 307/34 IPC, finding prima facie evidence of false implication and imposing protective conditions to safeguard the complainant.
Vedanta Limited & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioners are entitled to a 10-year extension of the PSC tenure under Article 2.1 on existing terms, rejecting the applicability of a subsequently framed New Policy and affirming writ jurisdiction in the matter.
Reema Salkan v. Sumer Singh Salkan
The Delhi High Court allowed the wife's revision petition and directed the husband to pay maintenance from 2010 onwards, affirming that an able-bodied husband cannot evade maintenance obligations by claiming unemployment without proof.
Madan Singh & Ors. v. Bhupinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's acceptance of compromise between some parties in a partition suit where the appellants failed to lead evidence, and declined to pass a compromise decree affecting non-consenting parties.
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB & Anr. v. HM Megabrands Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using 'HM' mark, holding it infringed plaintiffs' prior well-known 'H&M' trademark and constituted passing off.
Surinder Kumar Beri & Anr. v. Deepak Beri & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award recording a family business settlement under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act but set aside additional directions passed without due procedure and opportunity to be heard.
M/S. G4S Facility Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I
The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal's order requiring the appellant to pre-deposit 50% of provident fund dues before appeal, emphasizing the social welfare nature of the EPF Act and limiting writ court interference with interim orders.
Sunder Paswan & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted three accused of murder and robbery due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, lack of corroboration, and procedural lapses, setting aside their convictions and sentences.
Farha Hussain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a COFEPOSA detention order against a customs broker due to lack of proximate cause, failure to consider relevant facts, and absence of material showing likelihood of continued smuggling activities.
Syed Shahid Yousuf v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court upheld the extension of investigation and judicial custody under UAPA, ruling that the Public Prosecutor's report requirement was met and statutory bail was not yet due.
Meena & Ors. v. Ram Kishan Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the possession decree in favor of the Plaintiff, dismissing the Defendant's claim of Waqf Board ownership and unauthorized occupation of the suit property.
Chandra Gupt v. Bharat Gupt & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for recovery of possession as barred by res judicata and abuse of process, holding that a mediated settlement in an earlier suit for mandatory injunction is binding and enforceable.
Mohd. Shahrukh v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 392 IPC due to contradictory prosecution evidence and unreliable identification of stolen property, granting the appellant the benefit of doubt.
Rajiv Kumar v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw the appeal filed by Rajiv Kumar and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, disposing of all pending applications.
Satto Devi v. Neelu Khattar
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to grant extension of time for payment under a settlement agreement incorporated in court orders in absence of statutory compulsion, subject to conditions to compensate the aggrieved party.
Mohammed Rais v. M/S Abhi Packaging
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the money decree against M/s. Zen International, holding that Mr. Mohammad Rais is liable for the firm's debts despite disputing proprietorship.
Sanofi India Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining coercive action against Sanofi India Ltd. pending disposal of review petitions challenging demand notices issued under impugned notifications.